On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 13:40 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:23 PM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
>
> > Great! After passing those keys trough `ssh-keygen -lf`, I get the
> > confirmation I was looking for.
>
> Why do you need ssh-keygen when you can just add the ssh key to your
> kn
[adding -devel]
On ഞായര് 25 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2018 03:01 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Does other ftp masters agree with this assessment of considering the
> size of the package as the only criteria to accept or reject a package?
> I don't agree with forcing other contributors to do extra, non standard,
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
> It often wished that these pages would show the fingerprints too. Where
> would that bug need to go? A db.debian.org pseudo package does not seem
> to exist.
DSA explicitly removed fingerprints from those pages because they are
less useful th
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:23 PM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> Great! After passing those keys trough `ssh-keygen -lf`, I get the
> confirmation I was looking for.
Why do you need ssh-keygen when you can just add the ssh key to your
known_hosts file?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> I am unable to find a place where the SSH fingerprint of salsa is shown.
> I want to compare it with the one displayed when I try to push some
> changes.
Please see the FAQ:
https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/FAQ#How_can_I_verify_the_ssh_key_f
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I suppose an alternative is to have the BTS ignore the special effect
> for -done messages which don't have a Version:, Package:, or other
> appropriate pseudoheader from a message which looks signed, a mailing
> address which is not the submi
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Now, as a strawman proposition, here's what I fiddled with in my mind for some
> days now:
This reminds me a bit of Nix or Gentoo Prefix.
> ** is restricted to be arch:all (~ shipping interpreter scripts)
Hmm, so this isn't going to
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 09:54:14 -0800 Georg Faerber
wrote
Therefore, I'm wondering what's the correct place: Would
/usr/local/lib/schleuder/plugins be sensible? If not, any other place
which is more suitable?
If they're binaries, the FHS answer is that
Hi!
Jacob Adams:
> I am looking to create an application for the PGP Clean Room Live CD
> that walks a user through setting up a set of USB flash drives or sd
> cards as a raid disk, generating new GPG keys, storing them there, and
> then exporting subkeys either on a separate USB stick or a PGP
* Ian Jackson [180228 17:45]:
> Georg Faerber writes ("FHS: Where to store user specific plugins / code"):
> > I'm maintaining schleuder in Debian [1], a "gpg-enabled mailing list
> > manager with resending-capabilities".
> >
> > Currently, we allow users to run / execute their own plugins, store
Georg Faerber writes ("FHS: Where to store user specific plugins / code"):
> I'm maintaining schleuder in Debian [1], a "gpg-enabled mailing list
> manager with resending-capabilities".
>
> Currently, we allow users to run / execute their own plugins, stored in
> /etc/schleuder/plugins. Obviously,
Hello all,
I'm a prospective student for Debian's Google Summer of Code 2018 and I
am interested in working on a project that I think is important to
Debian but requires at least one more co-mentor to move forward. I've
asked around on a few more specific lists, but haven't heard anything
back, so
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:06:33PM +0100, Alex Muntada wrote:
> Hi Alberto,
>
> > I am unable to find a place where the SSH fingerprint of salsa
> > is shown.
>
> You'll find the SSH keys for DSA servers in:
> https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi
>
> In this case, search for salsa and you'll find:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:59:56AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I suppose an alternative is to have the BTS ignore the special effect
> for -done messages which don't have a Version:, Package:, or other
> appropriate pseudoheader from a message which looks signed, a mailing
> address which is not
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Paul Wise writes ("Re: Spam targeting nnn-done@bugs.d.o"):
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:29 PM, Steve Cotton wrote:
> > > Maybe the Package: pseudo-header should be mandatory for a nnn-done@ email
> > > to close the bug? That would protect against both spa
Hi Debian Developers, all,
I'm maintaining schleuder in Debian [1], a "gpg-enabled mailing list
manager with resending-capabilities".
Currently, we allow users to run / execute their own plugins, stored in
/etc/schleuder/plugins. Obviously, that's not the right place, as /etc
is for config files,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Guimard
* Package name: libauth-googleauth-perl
Version : 1.02
Upstream Author : Gryphon Shafer
* URL : https://metacpan.org/pod/Auth::GoogleAuth
* License : Aristic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Descriptio
Alex Muntada writes:
> Hi Alberto,
>
>> I am unable to find a place where the SSH fingerprint of salsa
>> is shown.
>
> You'll find the SSH keys for DSA servers in:
> https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi
>
> In this case, search for salsa and you'll find:
> https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=go
Hi Alberto,
> I am unable to find a place where the SSH fingerprint of salsa
> is shown.
You'll find the SSH keys for DSA servers in:
https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi
In this case, search for salsa and you'll find:
https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=godard
Cheers,
Alex
signature.asc
D
Hello,
I am unable to find a place where the SSH fingerprint of salsa is shown.
I want to compare it with the one displayed when I try to push some
changes.
Thanks!
--
Alberto
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: What can Debian do to provide complex applications
to its users?"):
> Here is a different straw man, which I think might be similarly effective
> and a lot less work:
FTR, even though I am trying to participate constructively and help
refine Didier's proposal, I think
Sean Whitton writes ("Re: What can Debian do to provide complex applications to
its users?"):
> On Tue, Feb 27 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I would like to suggest a radical approach to the source code
> > management for your system: abandon source *packages* in favour of git
> > trees.
>
> Why d
Paul Wise writes ("Re: Spam targeting nnn-done@bugs.d.o"):
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:29 PM, Steve Cotton wrote:
> > Maybe the Package: pseudo-header should be mandatory for a nnn-done@ email
> > to close the bug? That would protect against both spam and typos.
>
> That sounds best to me, but I
See attached order.
>> http://collinesducens.fr/Invoice-Corrections-for-9897956/
Best wishes,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-tippex
Version : 3.0.0
Upstream Author : Rich Harris
* URL : https://github.com/Rich-Harris/tippex#readme
* License : Expat
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kira Obrezkova
* Package name: osmocom-analog
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Andreas Eversberg
* URL : http://osmocom-analog.eversberg.eu/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Implementation of
26 matches
Mail list logo