Hi!
On kernel 4.14.13-1 linux-image-4.14.0-3-amd64 Debian Sid my
Lenonvo Laptop will relaibaly lock up executing systemctl daemon-reload.
Under Debian stretch kernel linux-image-4.9.0-5-amd64 4.9.65-3+deb9u2 this
does not happen. I hae attached a picture of the kernel panic on the
console.
My gu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Senthil Kumaran S (stylesen)
* Package name: lavacli
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Linaro LAVA Team
* URL : https://www.linaro.org/initiatives/lava/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : LAVA X
]] Ian Jackson
There is still no need to Cc folks on Debian lists unless explicitly
requested.
> Tollef Fog Heen writes ("Re: udftools, pktsetup and init scripts"):
> >] Pali Rohár
> >
> > > What do you think about moving pktsetup into own binary package? Users
> > > who do not need packet wri
Marco d'Itri writes ("Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?"):
> On Dec 31, Simon Richter wrote:
> > These are running stretch, and I would like to upgrade them without
> > breaking my existing scripts, which assume sysvinit with runlevels
> > (including one-shot runlevels).
>
> Somebody having
Tollef Fog Heen writes ("Re: udftools, pktsetup and init scripts"):
>] Pali Rohár
>
> > What do you think about moving pktsetup into own binary package? Users
> > who do not need packet writing configuration and only need tools for UDF
> > filesystem would install only udftools package.
>
> udfto
Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#886219: lintian should be less pedantic about
latest policy version"):
> Let me first say exactly what change I'd recommend:
> - out-of-date-standards-version should be I: or P: instead of W:
> - ancient-standards-version should remain W:
> - ancient-standards-version
Mattia Rizzolo writes ("Re: Bug#886219: lintian should be less pedantic about
latest policy version"):
> Currently there are two related tags:
> * https://lintian.debian.org/tags/out-of-date-standards-version.html
> which is reported when an upload is done and the date of the
> changelog is ol
Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Why do we list individual copyright holders?"):
> Our current culture under which many of us feel obligated to ensure our
> package uses the latest Standards-Version is problematic.
I quite agree.
> IMO the point of the field is to ensure that you /don't/ have to upgrade
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-cran-dbplyr
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Hadley Wickham
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=dbplyr
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: GNU R
Description : GNU R dplyr bac
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-cran-plotly
Version : 4.7.1
Upstream Author : Carson Sievert
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=plotly
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: GNU R
Description : create interact
Hi all,
just a short notice on FreeRDP in Debian...
Over the last months all packages relying / depending on freerdp have
switched over to using freerdp2. This is great.
The last package that depends on freerdp (v1.1) is a debian-edu
related meta-package. The new version of that meta-packa
11 matches
Mail list logo