On 11 January 2018 at 21:41, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:26:23PM +1100, Will Rouesnel wrote:
>> * Package name: tlog
>> Upstream Author : Nikolai Kondrashov
>> * URL : http://scribery.github.io/tlog/
>> Description : Terminal I/O recording and playbac
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sergei Golovan
* Package name: tk8.7
Version : 8.7a1
Upstream Author : Tcl Core Team
* URL : http://www.tcl.tk/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, Tcl
Description : Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.7
Tk is a cros
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sergei Golovan
* Package name: tcl8.7
Version : 8.7a1
Upstream Author : Tcl Core Team
* URL : http://www.tcl.tk/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, Tcl
Description : Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v8.7
Tcl is
On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 00:11 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
[...]
> src:linux, where complete authorship information is often not easily
> available [1] and copyright ownership information is in many cases not
> available at all [2], would actually be a good litmus test for what
> requirements are wor
Hi, I have a question.
Let's say I have a package performing a dir_to_symlink conversion from
version 2.0, so I specify "prior-version" as 2.0~.
Now let's say that I backport version 3 to Wheezy, whose version of
dpkg-maintscript-helper doesn't support dir_to_symlink, so I remove the
call to dpkg
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1163 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 148 (new: 2)
Total number of packages reques
Quoting Nikolaus Rath (2018-01-11 22:15:44)
> On Jan 11 2018, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > We can check whether two binary packages built with a different set of
> > build profiles active are actually the same by using the tools from
> > the reproducible builds project.
> Now I'm mightily confused.
On Jan 11 2018, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> We can check whether two binary packages built with a different set of
> build profiles active are actually the same by using the tools from
> the reproducible builds project.
Now I'm mightily confused. What's the point of build profiles if they
result in
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:26:23PM +1100, Will Rouesnel wrote:
> * Package name: tlog
> Upstream Author : Nikolai Kondrashov
> * URL : http://scribery.github.io/tlog/
> Description : Terminal I/O recording and playback package.
>
> tlog is a terminal I/O recording and pla
Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 23:32:58 +0100 Source: tor Binary: tor
tor-geoipdb Architecture: source Version: 0.3.1.9-1 Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high Maintainer: Peter Palfrader Changed-By:
Peter Palfrader Description: tor - anonymizing overlay
network for TCP tor-geoipdb - GeoIP dat
Hi,
Moving repo to salsa and starting an alternative ML have been done.
I am now wondering what is the best practice for closing alioth service
when occasional diverse committers are involved.
* How can I easily set up redirection service for incoming mails to an
aioth ML forwarded to a new l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Will Rouesnel
* Package name: tlog
Version : 3
Upstream Author : Nikolai Kondrashov
* URL : http://scribery.github.io/tlog/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Terminal I/O recording and playback pa
Am Donnerstag, den 11.01.2018, 12:33 +0200 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 11:00 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Both tools create a Debian OS and use a Jinja config which allows
> > specifying individual steps. Can the forces be joined?
>
> One is in Go, one in Python. There's no
Simon McVittie wrote:
> The reason I brought it up is that you mentioned detecting such bugs as
> a reason to prefer not to force TZ=UTC for related packages' builds;
> but if that makes a package's build fail, then it becomes "artificially"
> RC, whether it would have been RC on its own merits or
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 12:33:31PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 11:00 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Both tools create a Debian OS and use a Jinja config which allows
> > specifying individual steps. Can the forces be joined?
>
> One is in Go, one in Python. There's nothi
On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 11:00 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Both tools create a Debian OS and use a Jinja config which allows
> specifying individual steps. Can the forces be joined?
One is in Go, one in Python. There's nothing similar in the code bases.
I see no chance of "joining forces", nor muc
Am Dienstag, den 09.01.2018, 19:34 +0100 schrieb Hector Oron:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Héctor Orón Martínez
>
> * Package name: debos
> Version : 1.0.0+git20171222.87b0d5e-1
> Upstream Author :
> * URL : https://github.com/go-debos/debos
> * Licens
On 2018-01-11 01:46, Guillem Jover wrote:
[ Just few comments to complement josch's veyr nice reply, with which I
completely agree with. ]
On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 00:47:28 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
Quoting Steve Langasek (2018-01-10 21:49:02)
> As a policy, I think it's clear that packages
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 at 11:36:57 +0530, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > Just as one example, a timezone library that did not work properly
> > > in timezones beyond UTC+0800, etc.
> >
> > That's a bug, sure, but is it necessarily a release-critical bug?
>
> I'm not sure I see the value in discussing
> the
19 matches
Mail list logo
