[ Sorry for the duplicate. So began, and I guess now finishes, my brief
exploration of the Evolution MUA. ]
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martín Ferrari
* Package name: golang-github-prometheus-tsdb
Version : 0.0~git20171208.e103f21-1
Upstream Author : Prometheus
* URL : https://github.com/prometheus/tsdb
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Desc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martín Ferrari
* Package name: golang-github-mwitkow-go-conntrack
Version : 0.0~git20161129.cc309e4-1
Upstream Author : Michal Witkowski
* URL : https://github.com/mwitkow/go-conntrack
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Jung
* Package name: journalwatch
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Florian Bruhin
* URL : https://github.com/The-Compiler/journalwatch
* License : GPL-3.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Simple log m
On Sun, 2017-12-03 at 23:43 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> tl;dr: Desktop tasks have unexpected (from the user point of view)
> side
> effects due to dependencies. This can be considered harmful since the
> installer task selection can easily can trick a user into installing
> a
> "substandard" system.
On Sun, 2017-12-03 at 23:43 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> tl;dr: Desktop tasks have unexpected (from the user point of view)
> side
> effects due to dependencies. This can be considered harmful since the
> installer task selection can easily can trick a user into installing
> a
> "substandard" system.
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> +1. I'd love some guidance on this. I'm not convinced that our current
> Policy approach is best here.
Let me ping about https://bugs.debian.org/859649 which is much simpler
than the other CC bug it was (erroneously?) marked a duplicate of
Hi Emilio,
On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:01:54 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> On 08/12/17 11:02, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:
> > Hi,
> > being new to the Debian schroot setup on Debian machines, I tried
> > debugging some package. I found the crash happening in a library pulled
> > as a runtime depe
On 08/12/17 11:02, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:
> Hi,
> being new to the Debian schroot setup on Debian machines, I tried
> debugging some package. I found the crash happening in a library pulled
> as a runtime dependency.
> My idea was to recompile that library with some debug enabled and install
> tho
Hi,
being new to the Debian schroot setup on Debian machines, I tried
debugging some package. I found the crash happening in a library pulled
as a runtime dependency.
My idea was to recompile that library with some debug enabled and install
those custom .deb's within the current schroot, to rerun t
U
Sent from my iPhone
Quoting Ben Finney :
If I understand correctly, the justification of putting a file there
must include that it is overwhelmingly more likely to save *storage
space* overall (by reducing the space in a corresponding number of
‘/usr/share/doc/…/copyright’ files), especially on machines that have
lo
Quoting Markus Koschany :
Why don't we add all DFSG-free licenses to /usr/share/common-licenses or
/usr/share/free-licenses instead? It would save a lot of developer and
maintenance time
...
IMHO using links and
references is just common sense and reduces unnecessary make work.
+1 with "all D
13 matches
Mail list logo
