Hi list,
I'm trying to fetch the wheezy mirror using debmirror.
However, some files are ignored by debmirror. For instance,
wheezy-updates' main binary-installer for i386 has a Packages.gz [1]
file that seems an empty (20 bytes) . debmirror ignores it.
When running debmirror to only fetch that deb
On ഞായര് 08 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 05:57 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Though it will require updating npm to a newer version [3] and/or
> packaging yarn [4] (both are in progress).
Yesterday Sruthi launched a crowd funding campaign to update npm.
https://www.generosity.com/fundraising/update-npm-package
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Just bundle the libs, as you would do on Windows, and you'll be fine (wrt
> Qt, not wrt libc, but that's a separate problem). After all, running
> software compiled on a different system was never fully supported even if
> the dependenc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-sushy
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/sushy
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : small li
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:24:29AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > recommends wont work, they arent installed on upgrades…
> I haven't tested it, but at least according to apt's changelog new
> recommends are installed on upgrade as of 0.7.0 as log as
> APT::Install-Recommends is true, which h
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 01:00:58PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> recommends wont work, they arent installed on upgrades…
I haven't tested it, but at least according to apt's changelog new
recommends are installed on upgrade as of 0.7.0 as log as
APT::Install-Recommends is true, which has been the
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:01:18AM +0200, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> Could'nt we:
>
> 5. Make linux-image-$abi-$arch Depends on apparmor | selinux-basics |
> tomoyo-tools | linux-no-lsm
>
> With linux-no-lsm being a new empty package, and all of apparmor,
> selinux-basics, tomoyo-tools enable the c
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 08:57:26AM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Anthony DeRobertis
> wrote:
> > 3. Have a Recommends or Depends on it from another package that is
> > installed. (Presumably that'd be a Recommends from the linux-image-*
> > packages, and would be d
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 03:40:25PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> The rationale for keeping qt4 in the archive for me (same for gtk1,
> gtk2, etc.) is so that people could continue to build or run
> out-of-distro legacy software far into the future. It saddens me that I
> could very likely run an
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:34:14AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
Meyer wrote:
No, we are actively working towards removing Qt4 from the archive
during the Buster cycle. In this case libressl might help giving it a
little bit longer life, but nothing more.
That's entirely up to you; but,
Hi Jonathan!
On martes, 17 de octubre de 2017 08:49:58 -03 Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 03:29:31PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
>
> Meyer wrote:
> >Hi everyone! This is the required notice before starting with the mass
> >bug filling in order to *try* to remove Qt4 in
Package: wnpp
Owner: Lev Lamberov
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: suggest-el
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Wilfred Hughes
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/Wilfred/suggest.el
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Emacs Lisp
Description : discover Emacs Li
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 08:57:26AM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > 3. Have a Recommends or Depends on it from another package that is
> > installed. (Presumably that'd be a Recommends from the linux-image-*
> > packages, and would be dropped down to a Suggests for buster+1).
> Why shouldn't it stay
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Anthony DeRobertis
wrote:
> 3. Have a Recommends or Depends on it from another package that is
> installed. (Presumably that'd be a Recommends from the linux-image-*
> packages, and would be dropped down to a Suggests for buster+1).
Why shouldn't it stay a Recomm
Hi,
intrigeri:
> Chris Lamb:
>> So… in the spirit of taking (reversible!) risks, can you briefly outline
>> what's blocking us enabling this today? :)
> Thanks for asking!
> I've scheduled time on October 23-27 to:
We made good progress. Thanks a lot to Vincas Dargis and the Ubuntu
and openSUSE
Mathieu Parent:
> Could'nt we:
> 5. Make linux-image-$abi-$arch Depends on apparmor | selinux-basics |
> tomoyo-tools | linux-no-lsm
> With linux-no-lsm being a new empty package, and all of apparmor,
> selinux-basics, tomoyo-tools enable the corresponding LSM.
This would be ideal on the long te
Hi,
2017-10-27 5:29 GMT+02:00 Anthony DeRobertis :
> I think the only two ways to get a new package installed upon stretch →
> buster are:
>
> 1. Suggest the admin do it in the release notes. (It should be documented in
> the release notes no matter which option we pick, of course.)
>
> 2. Suggest
17 matches
Mail list logo
