On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:39:51PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> The first thing I wanted to find out, the separation of changelogs
> happened in 1998 according to dpkg changelogs.
>
> dpkg (1.4.0.22) frozen unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Non-maintainer bug-fix release
> * Install main change
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steve M. Robbins"
* Package name: libmediawiki
Upstream Author : Team maintained; see
https://github.com/KDE/libmediawiki/blob/master/AUTHORS
* URL : https://cgit.kde.org/libmediawiki.git
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
On 08/12/2017 07:35 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 12, "Dr. Bas Wijnen" wrote:
>
>> Which would be a great example of software that is free interacting with
>> software that is non-free. Thus the package with this as its main purpose
>> should live in contrib. There's nothing wrong with that.
]] "Dr. Bas Wijnen"
> But it's running on a different server. How is the "unrar-server" different
> from an icq server? The unrar-client would be free software.
The value of an ICQ server with a singular user is pretty low. The
value there lies not in the software itself, but the network effe
On 2017-08-28 09:14, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I analyzed file conflicts in binary packages marked Multi-Arch: same. To
> do that, I created a branch of https://dedup.debian.net/ specifically
> for analyzing multiarchy features of packages. The resulting issues are
> fed into tracker.d.o alre
at bottom :-
On 28/08/2017, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 12:50:48 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>> It did take a little while for the current format to evolve. For
>> example, very early source packages had changes recorded in a
>> "debian.README" file in somewhat ad-hoc for
.org" BTS pseudo-
package. You can read more about Lintian autorejects on the
ftpmaster webpages [4].)
[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-dak/2017/08/msg5.html
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873489
[2]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducib
Hi!
On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 12:50:48 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> It did take a little while for the current format to evolve. For
> example, very early source packages had changes recorded in a
> "debian.README" file in somewhat ad-hoc formats.
>
> I think the current changelog format arrived wit
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> It would be helpful if somebody has one of the 1996 packages snapshots
> and can share how the changelogs were at that point of time. That
> might give a bit of reference as to how things were and if there were
> any changes between them and now.
http://
On 2017-08-28 at 07:59, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:31:15PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> The existence of that API in the form of the client is a
>> documentation that should be sufficient to reproduce a server that
>> can communicate with the client. Do we expect that som
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonathan Carter
* Package name: golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3
Version : 3.0
Upstream Author : Florian Schlachter
* URL : https://github.com/flosch/pongo2
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Django
Thanks Philipp, unlike the mail I responded to a few minutes ago, yours is
constructive and I'm happy to continue discussing this with you.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:31:15PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 08/27/2017 12:20 PM, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 06:21:23PM +0200, Ph
Am 2017-08-28 09:14, schrieb Helmut Grohne:
Here is the bug template:
v v v v v
Package: $1
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
$1 is marked Multi-Arch: same, but fails to coinstall with itself on $2
and $3. You can find a failing installation l
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 04:10:05PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> @Andrey Rahmatullin I read your answer at
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/08/msg00598.html but it
> doesn't tell me whether this obvious idea was born in Debian or some
> other GNU/Linux distribution. I do not the early
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:46:16AM +, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > > > > Are you saying that a Debian system where only main is enabled is
> > > > > unsafe?
> > > > [...]
> > > > > If that is correct, it is a huge problem that that is the default
> > > > > setup
> > > > > we ship, don't you thin
Dear Audrey,
Please CC me. I read
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/08/msg00600.html
My mistake, I assumed the package was named lcdproc and not
pkg-config-model which the package is all about. Sorry for being a bit
incoherent, just not in the best of the health.
I had seen the page htt
I'm getting tired of this. You keep avoiding my questions and changing the
subject. Unless you start answering my questions, I'm going to stop
responding.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:21:01PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 08:55:43AM +, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > > >
at bottom :-
On 27/08/2017, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 August 2017 08:01:54 CEST shirish शिरीष wrote:
>> Are there any such unsung technical/non-technical or social
>> innovations that Debian has done that is now known/or lesser known
>> which Debianities should know about and be p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aggelos Avgerinos
* Package name: goreplay
Version : 0.16.1
Upstream Author : Leonid Bugaev
* URL : https://github.com/buger/goreplay
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Go
Description : GoReplay is an open-source
On 08/27/2017 12:20 PM, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 06:21:23PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> On 08/18/2017 10:36 AM, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
>>> Consider the following: unrar-nonfree contains some software which is
>>> non-free
>>> and can therefore not be in main. The reason we
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 03:51:22PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Dear Dominique,
>
> Thank you for sharing about lcdproc as response to my mail. For my 2
> cents, I disliked the idea (of lcdproc) immediately as simply applying
> maintainer changes defeats the very purpose the tool declares or
> cl
Dear Dominique,
Thank you for sharing about lcdproc as response to my mail. For my 2
cents, I disliked the idea (of lcdproc) immediately as simply applying
maintainer changes defeats the very purpose the tool declares or
claims to help. For e.g. I know of quite a few people where the modem
login p
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 03:01:03PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> While I'm pretty happy with the way Debian organizes this thing, was
> this idea of having separate changelogs to lessen confusion born at
> Debian or some other GNU/Linux distribution. If so, where and when
> this idea was born, impl
Dear all,
Please CC me if anybody has an answer to below as I'm not subscribed
to either of the mailing lists due to the volume both ML generate.
I like the way Debian gives various changelogs . For instance for most
packages it has -
changelog.gz - This is the upstream changelog giving d
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 08:55:43AM +, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > > Are you saying that a Debian system where only main is enabled is unsafe?
> > [...]
> > > If that is correct, it is a huge problem that that is the default setup
> > > we ship, don't you think?
> > It is, but solving it most like
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:29:07PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:58:50AM +, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > Are you saying that a Debian system where only main is enabled is unsafe?
> [...]
> > If that is correct, it is a huge problem that that is the default setup
> >
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:58:50AM +, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > > Let me put it differently then: for me, one of the major benefits of
> > > Debian
> > > over (most of) our derivatives is that I can set the system up in a way
> > > that
> > > allows me to live in a free software bubble.
> >
Hi,
I analyzed file conflicts in binary packages marked Multi-Arch: same. To
do that, I created a branch of https://dedup.debian.net/ specifically
for analyzing multiarchy features of packages. The resulting issues are
fed into tracker.d.o already, but little happens about them. File
conflicts in
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 04:00:54PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 10:20:27AM +, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > Let me put it differently then: for me, one of the major benefits of Debian
> > over (most of) our derivatives is that I can set the system up in a way that
> >
29 matches
Mail list logo
