Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-unicode-tr51
Version : 9.0.0
Upstream Author : Mathias Bynens (https://mathiasbynens.be/)
* URL : https://mths.be/unicode-tr51
* License : Expa
[ Please note the cross-post and Reply-To ]
Hi folks,
As promised, here's a quick summary of what was discussed at the web
team BoF session in Montréal.
Thanks to the awesome efforts of our video team, the session is
already online [1]. I've taken a copy of the Gobby notes too,
alongside my smal
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-unicode-property-aliases-ecmascript
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : Mathias Bynens (https://mathiasbynens.be/)
* URL :
https://github.com/mathiasbyne
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-unicode-canonical-property-names-ecmascript
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Mathias Bynens (https://mathiasbynens.be/)
* URL :
https://github.com/mat
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-unicode-canonical-property-names-ecmascript
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Mathias Bynens (https://mathiasbynens.be/)
* URL :
https://github.com/mat
On 08/18/2017 10:36 AM, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> Consider the following: unrar-nonfree contains some software which is non-free
> and can therefore not be in main. The reason we don't put it in main is that
> we want users who care about freedom to not even see this software. Agreed?
Ex falso quo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-buble
Version : 0.15.2
Upstream Author : Rich Harris
* URL : https://gitlab.com/Rich-Harris/buble#README
* License : Expat
Programming Lang:
Hi,
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 14:16:25 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> While I think we might want to ship buster with TLS 1.0 available, I
> think running with it disabled for parts of the development cycle is
> very useful, since it exposes bugs we have in packages that will use
> that version out of
Howdy all,
I am catching up with the Linux.conf.au 2017 presentations, and have
just watched “Package Managers All the Way Down” by Kristoffer Grönlund
https://archive.org/details/lca2017-Package_Managers_all_the_way_down>,
also discussed at LWN https://lwn.net/Articles/712318/>.
The problems Kri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Med
* Package name: bandage
Version : 0.8.1
Upstream Author : Ryan R. Wick
* URL : https://github.com/rrwick/Bandage/
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Bioinformatics Application for Nav
Robert Edmonds:
The only package in the archive that I know of that has a seriously
deficient set of root hints is djbdns; it has 11/13 of the current set
of IPv4 root server addresses, and 0/13 IPv6 root server addresses.
(However, I don't believe the 'djbdns' binary package ships with the
IP
11 matches
Mail list logo