Re: IMPORTANT: Do live Debian images have a future?

2017-07-04 Thread Michael .
Thomas it is all fine and good to say "(lets not go into details why this happened)" but the details support the reality of the situation. Please read (https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2015/11/msg8.html) and see where Iain says >>It is worth noting that live-build is not a Debian project,

Bug#867238: ITP: ocaml-sedlex -- Unicode-friendly lexer generator for OCaml

2017-07-04 Thread Andy Li
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andy Li -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: ocaml-sedlex Version : 1.99.3 Upstream Author : Alain Frisch * URL : https://github.com/alainfrisch/sedlex * License : MIT Programming Lang: OCaml

Re: Declarative packaging (Was: Re: Intended MBF: maintainer scripts not using strict mode)

2017-07-04 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 13:58:39 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Paul Wise writes ("Re: Declarative packaging (Was: Re: Intended MBF: > maintainer scripts not using strict mode)"): > > IIRC last time we discussed this, the recommendation was to set an > > environment variable that maintainer scrip

Bug#867233: ITP: golang-github-google-go-github -- Go library for accessing the GitHub API

2017-07-04 Thread Patrick O'Doherty
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Patrick O'Doherty * Package name: golang-github-google-go-github Version : 0.0~git20170604.0.7a51fb9-1 Upstream Author : Google * URL : https://github.com/google/go-github * License : BSD-3-Clause Programming Lang: Go

Re: IMPORTANT: Do live Debian images have a future?

2017-07-04 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/27/2017 11:53 PM, Michael . wrote: > Charles, let me clear up a couple of misconceptions for you. Debian Live > (made with Live Wrapper) is an official Debian project. Live Build (the > old Debian Live) apparently wasn't official but was recognised by Debian > for its official images. Live Bu

Re: IMPORTANT: Do live Debian images have a future?

2017-07-04 Thread Steve McIntyre
prav...@onenetbeyond.org wrote: >> If our live images are going to be good enough to meet the standards >> that Debian users deserve and expect, we need *consistent*, >> *sustained* involvement from a lot more people. Please tell me if >> you're going to help. If we don't see a radical improvement

Re: IMPORTANT: Do live Debian images have a future?

2017-07-04 Thread Rick Thomas
On Jul 3, 2017, at 8:53 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > arm64 > live images are on my todo list already for the buster cycle. Great! Will they work with RaspberryPi-3? Rick

Re: IMPORTANT: Do live Debian images have a future?

2017-07-04 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 04:25:48AM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote: > >On Jul 3, 2017, at 8:53 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> arm64 >> live images are on my todo list already for the buster cycle. > >Great! Will they work with RaspberryPi-3? I honestly have no idea. :-) Let's find that out when we get

Re: alioth replacement survey

2017-07-04 Thread Ian Jackson
Alexander Wirt writes ("Re: alioth replacement survey"): > The results are now final: https://people.debian.org/~formorer/Survey.pdf > > Please keep in mind: this was a survey, not a poll. I will start analysing > the result tomorrow and start a discussion about the decision on the alioth > replac