On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 09:00:41PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 12:16:58PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> > Both, procps and systemd support (/usr)?/lib/sysctl.d/*.conf, however only
> > one package (systemd-coredump) uses it, all others drop files in
> > /etc/sysctl.d.
>
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:18:54 +0200, Wouter Verhelst
wrote:
>I didn't say RPM *doesn't* deal with changed files; I said ours deals
>with it better. I stand by that.
Given that dpkg's conffile handling still has much headroom for
improvement, this is a rather sad statement for the rpm half of the
w
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1058 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 160 (new: 1)
Total number of packages reques
Brian May writes:
> On 2017-04-27 16:19, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>> It seems you've missed the point (which was about 4 years between RHEL
>> releases).
> There was almost three years between Woody (July 19th 2002) and Sarge
> (June 6th 2005), yet we still allowed upgrades from Woody to Sarge.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicholas D Steeves
* Package name: elpa-poetry
Version : 0.14
Upstream Author : Bob Newell
* URL : http://www.bobnewell.net/filez/poetry.el
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang: Elisp
Description : Poetry writing a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Hanke
* Package name: fsleyes
Version : 0.10.1
Upstream Author : Paul McCarthy
* URL : https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/
* License : Apache-2
Programming Lang: Python
Description : feature-rich view
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 07:53:57AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >
> > The "packages drop files in /usr/*, sysadmins override in /etc" way of
> > doing things is prevalent in the RPM world; in Debian, however, we
> > traditionally have packages dro
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 08:05:10AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >
> > All of this is caused by Red Hat having no support for upgrades:
> >
> > https://access.redhat.com/solutions/21964
> >
> > # Red Hat does not support in-place upgrades between maj
8 matches
Mail list logo
