Re: Archive no longer accepts uploads signed using SHA-1 or RIPE-MD/160

2017-02-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Wouter Verhelst writes: > Uhh? AFAIK, RIPEMD160 is not compromised at all, not even in a > theoretical attack. Why was this part of the decision taken? > (there is a theoretical attack against RIPEMD, but that is not the same > thing as RIPEMD160) Crypto folks have been dubious about RIPEMD160

Re: apt-get upgrade removing ifupdown on jessie→stretch upgrade

2017-02-24 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there, On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:12:10 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote: > * David Kalnischkies [Wed Feb 22, 2017 at 10:28:33PM +0100]: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:04:16PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > > > > ...it will break existing practices, e.g.: > > > DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get upg

Texas Ag Commissioner Approves Poison to Combat Wild Hogs, But There Could be Unintended Consequences

2017-02-24 Thread OutdoorHub
OutdoorHub Daily Newswire Front Page Texas Ag Commissioner Approves Poison to Combat Wild Hogs, But There Could be Unintended Consequences By: OutdoorHub Reporters Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller has approved the use of pesticides in the state of Texas when targeting wild pigs. Of cours

Re: [PKG-Openstack-devel] [openstack-dev] The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

2017-02-24 Thread Allison Randal
On 02/24/2017 06:25 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > rtslib-fb is a core component for the LIO(-fb) project. We already maintain > configshell-fb and targetcli-fb under pkg-linux-target group. Nod, that makes sense. I'd say you should take on maintenance of the rtslib-fb packages, as long as you're

Re: sane chromium default flags - include --enable-remote-extensions [and 1 more messages]

2017-02-24 Thread Ian Jackson
Sven Hoexter writes ("sane chromium default flags - include --enable-remote-extensions"): > I've found the issue to be tracked in https://bugs.debian.org/851927 I found that bug rather unenlightening TBH. Marco d'Itri writes ("Re: sane chromium default flags - include --enable-remote-extensions

Re: Archive no longer accepts uploads signed using SHA-1 or RIPE-MD/160

2017-02-24 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:48:21AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: [stuff] This is also just to say, I'm glad both algorithms have been removed, and refused on new uploads, and thanks to ansgar for doing this. Cheers, Paul -- signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Archive no longer accepts uploads signed using SHA-1 or RIPE-MD/160

2017-02-24 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:43:13PM +, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > or RIPE-MD/160 algorithms. > > > > Uhh? AFAIK, RIPEMD160 is not compromised at all, not even in a > > theoretical attack. Why was this part of the decision taken? > > > > (there

Re: Bug#856033: ITP: brailleimg -- produce text images and graphs abusing Braille glyphs

2017-02-24 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:45:31PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Adam Borowski, on ven. 24 févr. 2017 14:35:36 +0100, wrote: > > This tool takes an image and converts it to a dot matrix text > > representation using the Unicode range U+2800..28FF. This allows > > to hold an image at a resolut

Re: Archive no longer accepts uploads signed using SHA-1 or RIPE-MD/160

2017-02-24 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > or RIPE-MD/160 algorithms. > > Uhh? AFAIK, RIPEMD160 is not compromised at all, not even in a > theoretical attack. Why was this part of the decision taken? > > (there is a theoretical attack against RIPEMD, but that is not the same > thing as RIPE

Re: Archive no longer accepts uploads signed using SHA-1 or RIPE-MD/160

2017-02-24 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:07:23PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > The archive no longer accepts uploads signed using the SHA-1 Yay! (https://shattered.io is fun) > or RIPE-MD/160 algorithms. Uhh? AFAIK, RIPEMD160 is not compromised at all, not even in a theoretical attack. Why was this part o

Re: sane chromium default flags - include --enable-remote-extensions

2017-02-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Feb 24, Sven Hoexter wrote: > To be honest I've the feeling that we're doing a disservice to our > users when we release stretch with the current defaults. Putting I amazed by this decision: this is the kind of thing that makes people not take Debian seriously. This behaviour should either be

Re: Bug#856033: ITP: brailleimg -- produce text images and graphs abusing Braille glyphs

2017-02-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Adam Borowski, on ven. 24 févr. 2017 14:35:36 +0100, wrote: > This tool takes an image and converts it to a dot matrix text > representation using the Unicode range U+2800..28FF. This allows > to hold an image at a resolution of 2×4 pixels per character used. Mmm, isn't that what conv

Bug#856033: ITP: brailleimg -- produce text images and graphs abusing Braille glyphs

2017-02-24 Thread Adam Borowski
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Adam Borowski * Package name: brailleimg Upstream Author : yours truly * URL : https://github.com/kilobyte/brailleimg * License : you're asking tricky questions... Programming Lang: Perl Description : convert images to text

sane chromium default flags - include --enable-remote-extensions

2017-02-24 Thread Sven Hoexter
Hi, based on some random chatter on IRC I noticed that many people now have their own way of passing --enable-remote-extensions to chromium. The workarounds range from system wide stuff in /etc/chromium.d/ to local aliases or script wrapper in a ~/bin/chromium script. To be honest I've the feeling

Re: [openstack-dev] The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

2017-02-24 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Allison, On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 19:07 -0500, Allison Randal wrote: > > For the LIO-fb target in Debian, we've been depending on the rtslib-fb > package, > > which you've maintained so far. Should we pick it up under the pkg-linux- > target > >