The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1048 (new: 11)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 165 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reque
On 02/21/2017 12:57 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> Sad to see this. But with so much free loading trend, these are bound to
> happen.
>
> For the LIO-fb target in Debian, we've been depending on the rtslib-fb
> package,
> which you've maintained so far. Should we pick it up un
Am 23.02.2017 um 03:26 schrieb Patrick Schleizer:
> Tomas Pospisek:
>> Am 21.02.2017 um 01:55 schrieb Patrick Schleizer:
>>
>>> for file_name in /usr/lib/server-config.d/*.conf ; do
>>>file_list="$file_list $file_name"
>>> done
>>>
>>> for file_name in /etc/server-config.d/*.conf ; do
>>>fi
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 at 10:02:55 -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Yes, but last time I checked a "apt-get source && debuild -us -uc" still
> defaults to using just a single CPU unless you explicitly set
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel.
Check again - dpkg-buildpackage now defaults to -Jauto
(it sets DEB_B
❦ 23 février 2017 10:02 -0800, Nikolaus Rath :
Your chosen build environment is not common [...]
>>>
>>> This has come up a few times now. Could someone explain what is so odd
>>> about his envirnoment? It does not look unusual to me.
>>
>> Official buildd have several CPU. Most "important"
On Feb 21 2017, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 21 février 2017 09:48 -0800, Nikolaus Rath :
>
>>> Your chosen build environment is not common [...]
>>
>> This has come up a few times now. Could someone explain what is so odd
>> about his envirnoment? It does not look unusual to me.
>
> Official build
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: changelog practice, unfinalised vs UNRELEASED vs
~version"):
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 at 12:53:40 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > We could decorate the suite instead, but that does not have any
> > effect on generated binaries.
>
> It does have an effect on the changelog in
On 2017-02-14 23:01 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wookey writes ("Re: changelog practice, unfinalised vs UNRELEASED vs
> ~version"):
> > I'd be happier if I didn't have to deal with 'UNRELEASED' at all
> > unless I actually wanted to, so I'm not at all keen on your suggestion
> > of making it mandat
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:53:33AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I'd be interested in stats of Debian releases, preferred suites, apt
> policies and how many bugs were filed from systems running Debian
> derivatives, or other distros if any.
Alas, this data looks really unreliable. Entries often poin
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 at 12:53:40 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> We could
> decorate the suite instead, but that does not have any effect on
> generated binaries.
It does have an effect on the changelog inside the source and binary
packages, and on the changes file (which is precisely the signed
instru
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 01:50:46PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Adam Borowski, on jeu. 23 févr. 2017 13:37:36 +0100, wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:05:31PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> > > > I've done some data mining on bug reports that include a "System
> > > > Information" section t
Guido Günther writes ("Re: changelog practice, unfinalised vs UNRELEASED vs
~version"):
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 08:05:02PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I think the asnwer to this is the same as that I gave to Wookey who
> > mentioned a workflow involving vcs tags.
> >
> > I think we shou
Adam Borowski, on jeu. 23 févr. 2017 13:37:36 +0100, wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:05:31PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> > > I've done some data mining on bug reports that include a "System
> > > Information" section that reportbug adds.
> >
> > hours during the day
>
> 2016+, X scale: 1
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:05:31PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> > I've done some data mining on bug reports that include a "System
> > Information" section that reportbug adds.
>
> hours during the day
2016+, X scale: 1 dot = 12 minutes (5 dots = 2.5 chars = hour)
⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀
* David Kalnischkies [Wed Feb 22, 2017 at 10:28:33PM +0100]:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:04:16PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> > ...it will break existing practices, e.g.:
> > DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get upgrade -y
> > FYI, I would call it a regression.
> That specific invocation can
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 08:05:02PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Guido Günther writes ("Re: changelog practice, unfinalised vs UNRELEASED vs
> ~version"):
> > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:48:35PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > We do not seem to have a coherent approach to how to handle
> > > debian/c
Hi Emmanuel,
On 22:36 Wed 22 Feb , Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Apollon,
>
> If you plan to package this library, do you think you could bring it
> under the Java Team umbrella please?
Sure, that was my intention from the beginning, and the same goes for
typesafe-config as well.
Cheers,
Apol
17 matches
Mail list logo
