On February 12, 2017 3:37:59 PM EST, Luca Capello wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 14:11:12 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 at 12:48:35 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> > What do people think ?
...
>
>> I don't think Debian would be as
>> large or successful a project as
Sean Whitton dijo [Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 04:33:15PM -0700]:
> > So, my idea was, in short: Thinking in a post-Buster world, do we even
> > need the finalized line? I mean, take a look at debian/changes. The
> > archive handling tools do get both «Date» and «Changed-By» fields,
> > which reflect when
Sean Whitton dijo [Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 04:35:19PM -0700]:
> > (Of course, the signoff line in the changelog is redundant with
> > the GPG signature, which is what actually matters but isn't at all
> > user-visible...)
>
> It's not redundant for sponsored uploads where the sponsor is not a
> membe
Hello Simon,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 05:14:17PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> (Of course, the signoff line in the changelog is redundant with
> the GPG signature, which is what actually matters but isn't at all
> user-visible...)
It's not redundant for sponsored uploads where the sponsor is not
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:53:18AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> So, my idea was, in short: Thinking in a post-Buster world, do we even
> need the finalized line? I mean, take a look at debian/changes. The
> archive handling tools do get both «Date» and «Changed-By» fields,
> which reflect when the p
Considering all that has gone on over thsere where you live, and where my
own origins go back to; I was curious to know if you plan to assist with
getting out the news which is vital to all of the worlds peoples of the
horrific inclusion of genocidal medical inclusion in America. This, as a
devi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Federico Ceratto
* Package name: ttygif
Version : 1.4.0
Upstream Author : Ilia Choly
* URL : https://github.com/icholy/ttygif
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : generate gif animations from termina
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Landaeta
* Package name: ruby-jar-dependencies
Version : 0.3.10
Upstream Author : Christian Meier
* URL : https://github.com/mkristian/jar-dependencies
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: installer
Version: Wheezy
Upstream Author: [NAME ]
URL: [http://example.com]
License: [GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.]
Description:
Would prefer that all dpks would load when extracted, or be sent to a save
file, like gzip. But I am only a beginner in coding.
Daniel T. Hasbrouck
On Jan 17, 2017 8:38 PM, "Guillem Jover" wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to get some feedback from porters and package maintainers,
> given that this aff
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mario Limonciello
* Package name: thunderbolt-software-user-space
Version : 2017.01.19
Upstream Author : Intel Thunderbolt Linux Team
* URL : https://github.com/01org/thunderbolt-software-user-
space.git
* License : BSD
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Breno Leitao
* Package name: ndctl
Version : v55
Upstream Author : Dan Williams
* URL : https://github.com/pmem/ndctl
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : ndctl is a utility for managing the "libnvdim
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:53:18AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> So, my idea was, in short: Thinking in a post-Buster world, do we even
> need the finalized line? I mean, take a look at debian/changes. The
the changes file(s) is/are not part of the source packages and we are using
the last date in
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 at 10:53:18 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Interesting discussion. This (and not particularly your message, but
> this whole thread even leads me to questioning: Does our "finalized"
> changelog lines make *any* sense nowadays?
In the actual upload to the archive (as opposed to th
Simon McVittie dijo [Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 02:11:12PM +]:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 at 12:48:35 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > What do people think ?
>
> I think you're the only person I've ever seen using unfinalized
> changelog entries for Debian packages.
>
> If I'm understanding correctly, your
Ohh wow
Thank you so much
On 13 Feb 2017 18:17, "Wookey" wrote:
> dfh C0ngratuIatl0n
>
> _The_Home_Warranty_Limited_time_event_
>
> _Never_pay_for_covered_home_repairs_again!_
>
> _Click_Here_
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __If_You_Wish _To_UnSubscribe_From_Future_Mailings_
Emoties op de Werkvloer
Minder Stress, Meer Resultaten
Als u deze e-mail in tekstformaat ontvangt, zonder afbeeldingen,
klik hier [1]!
Is mijn team een sterk team?
2017
Emoties op de werkvloer, wat doet u ermee?
Overkomt het u wel eens dat u niet goed weet hoe met emo
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:34:35AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Implicitly you point out the flaw in my suggestion. tftpd-hpa can't
> consume tftpd configurations and we don't have a config converter.
> This shows that this question is more complicated and we should wait.
>
> I will try to remembe
What Does this mean.
On Feb 13, 2017 7:47 AM, "Wookey" wrote:
> dfh C0ngratuIatl0n
>
> _The_Home_Warranty_Limited_time_event_
>
> _Never_pay_for_covered_home_repairs_again!_
>
> _Click_Here_
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __If_You_Wish _To_UnSubscribe_From_Future_Mailings_Pl
On 2017-02-13 11:34 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Michael Biebl writes ("Re: Bug#843906: tftpd, removal in favour of
> tftpd-hpa"):
> > Have you thought about turning tftpd into an empty transitional package
> > which pulls in tftpd-hpa on upgrades?
>
> Implicitly you point out the flaw in my sugge
Stop sending me this SHIT,😠
On Feb 13, 2017 7:47 AM, "Wookey" wrote:
> dfh C0ngratuIatl0n
>
> _The_Home_Warranty_Limited_time_event_
>
> _Never_pay_for_covered_home_repairs_again!_
>
> _Click_Here_
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __If_You_Wish _To_UnSubscribe_From_Future_Maili
STOP
On Feb 13, 2017 7:47 AM, "Wookey" wrote:
> dfh C0ngratuIatl0n
>
> _The_Home_Warranty_Limited_time_event_
>
> _Never_pay_for_covered_home_repairs_again!_
>
> _Click_Here_
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __If_You_Wish _To_UnSubscribe_From_Future_Mailings_Please_Click_Here_
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kyle Robbertze
* Package name: fonts-sansation
Version : 1.31
Upstream Author : Berd Montag
* URL : http://www.dafont.com/sansation.font
* License : OFL-1.1
Programming Lang: TrueType Font
Description : Clean, fu
Michael Biebl writes ("Re: Bug#843906: tftpd, removal in favour of tftpd-hpa"):
> Have you thought about turning tftpd into an empty transitional package
> which pulls in tftpd-hpa on upgrades?
Implicitly you point out the flaw in my suggestion. tftpd-hpa can't
consume tftpd configurations and we
Am 13.02.2017 um 12:05 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> In #843906 I suggested removing tftpd because it's inferior to
> tftpd-hpa in every respect, and cannot boot some modern computers.
>
> I didn't manage to get around to this earlier but I wonder if it would
> still be a good idea, even for stretch.
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kyle Robbertze
* Package name: fonts-bebas-neue
Version : 3.0
Upstream Author : Ryoichi Tsunekawa
* URL : http://dharmatype.com/post/84312257192/bebas-neue
* License : OFL-1.1
Programming Lang: OpenType Font
Descript
On Feb 13, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I didn't manage to get around to this earlier but I wonder if it would
> still be a good idea, even for stretch.
Yes please.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
In #843906 I suggested removing tftpd because it's inferior to
tftpd-hpa in every respect, and cannot boot some modern computers.
I didn't manage to get around to this earlier but I wonder if it would
still be a good idea, even for stretch.
The actual changes would be:
* Add one Provides: to tft
28 matches
Mail list logo
