X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Potter
* Package name: golang-github-rsc-letsencrypt
Version : 0.0~git20160929.0.76104d2-1
Upstream Author : Russ Cox
* URL : https://gi
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Potter
* Package name: golang-github-docker-go-metrics
Version : 0.0~git20161110.0.0f35294-1
Upstream Author : Docker
* URL : https://gi
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Potter
* Package name: golang-github-tonistiigi-fifo
Version : 0.0~git20161203.0.fe870cc-1
Upstream Author : Tõnis Tiigi
* URL : https:/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Siddhesh Rane
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-base64-js
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : T. Jameson Little
* URL : https://github.com/beatgammit/base64-js
* License : Expat
Programming
On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 at 11:02:08 +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> In an MT context, such a program should probably use setenv between
> the fork and the exec (ie not in MT context)
Calling non-async-signal safe functions after fork but before exec, in
a process that uses threads, is undefined behavi
Hi,
could anyone please enlighten me why we have a chromium version in stable
security that is newer than what we have in unstable? The same version I did
find, though, in experimental. However, I wonder if anything not stable
enough(?) for unstable can make it into stable security. Or the other w
Le 31/01/2017 à 16:56, Christian Seiler a écrit :
> (Any program that calls setenv() will call getenv() as well at
> some point, otherwise you could simply drop the setenv() completely;
Not necessarily. Instead of calling getenv, it can call fork+exec
(that will run an other program, MT or not, in
Control: retitle -1 ITP: bcg729 -- ITU G.729 Annex A compatible audio codec
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 04:23:42PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:34:15AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > G.729 is a patent minefield, and some of them are actively enforced last
>
8 matches
Mail list logo