Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Diane Trout
* Package name: pybigwig
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : Devon Ryan
* URL : https://github.com/dpryan79/pyBigWig
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : module for quick access to b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Bombe
* Package name: muparserx
Version : 4.0.7
Upstream Author : Ingo Berg
* URL : http://articles.beltoforion.de/article.php?a=muparserx&hl=en
* License : BSD-2-clause
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: tendermint-go-rpc
Version : 0.0~git20161021.0.e6e3853
Upstream Author : The Tendermint Project
* URL : http://github.com/tendermint/go-rpc
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Golang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ximin Luo
* Package name: sagenb
Version : 0.13
Upstream Author : SageNB contributors
* URL : https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Python, JS
Description : The standalone Sage N
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kyle Robbertze
* Package name: iterum
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Kyle Robbertze
* URL : http://iterum.io/
* License : MIT/X/Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Iterum is a multi-protocol chat bot
I
Andrey Rahmatullin writes ("Re: MIA maintainers and RC-buggy packages"):
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 06:58:55PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Frankly, I would have been tempted to let a lot of those packages slip
> > out of stretch. It depends what they were, of course.
>
> I was following an advic
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 06:58:55PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * So: is it a real problem that there are packages that should be marked
> > as orphaned but they aren't? Should we spend any effort on marking more
> > orphaned packages? If yes, how should we do that?
>
> No, I think this is a wast
Andrey Rahmatullin writes ("MIA maintainers and RC-buggy packages"):
> * So: is it a real problem that there are packages that should be marked
> as orphaned but they aren't? Should we spend any effort on marking more
> orphaned packages? If yes, how should we do that?
No, I think this is a waste
Hello.
During the last week or two I've spent some time looking through the
packages with RC bugs, mostly those that are removed from testing, have
popcon 100+ and don't have recent activity on the bug report. I skipped
bugs like "depends on obsolete piece of software" or "crashes in some
circumst
Powered by Cricket Wireless.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lucio Correia
* Package name: ginger-base
Version : 2.2.1
Upstream Author : 2013-2016 International Business Machines Corporation and
others
* URL : https://github.com/kimchi-project/gingerbase
* License : LGPL-2.1+ and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lucio Correia
* Package name: wok
Version : 2.3.0
Upstream Author : 2013-2016 International Business Machines Corporation and
others
* URL : https://github.com/kimchi-project/wok
* License : LGPL-2.1+ and Apache-2.0
Pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sascha Steinbiss
* Package name: python-flask-sockets
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Kenneth Reitz
* URL : https://github.com/kennethreitz/flask-sockets
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : el
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sascha Steinbiss
* Package name: python-codegen
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Armin Ronacher
* URL : https://github.com/andreif/codegen
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : extension to ast tha
❦ 2 décembre 2016 10:55 +0100, Raphael Hertzog :
> the net-snmp source package is looking for a new maintainer:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835654
>
> It is currently affected by 3 release critical bugs and has many reverse
> dependencies so it really needs to be well ma
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sascha Steinbiss
* Package name: python-portpicker
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Google
* URL : https://github.com/google/python_portpicker
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python
Hello everybody,
the net-snmp source package is looking for a new maintainer:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835654
It is currently affected by 3 release critical bugs and has many reverse
dependencies so it really needs to be well maintained.
Uptsream seems to be reasonably re
17 matches
Mail list logo