Bug#843570: ITP: json5-parser -- C++ library to parse JSON5

2016-11-07 Thread Walter Landry
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Walter Landry * Package name: json5-parser Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Walter Landry * URL : https://github.com/Caltech-IPAC/json5_parser * License : MIT and BSD Programming Lang: C++ Description : C++ libr

Bug#843325: ITP: waf -- Tool for configuring, building, and installing projects

2016-11-07 Thread Walter Landry
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Walter Landry * Package name: waf Version : 1.9.5 Upstream Author : Thomas Nagy * URL : http://waf.io/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: Python Description : Tool for configuring, building, and installing projects

Re: More 5 november in the release schedule

2016-11-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 08, 2016 06:19:36 PM Brian May wrote: > Christian Seiler writes: > > Why? Any package currently in testing still has time to enter > > (until roughly end of this year), so it's not like there is no > > heads-up for people. And RC bugs don't lead to immediate > > removal from t

Re: More 5 november in the release schedule

2016-11-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Brian May wrote: > The problem is if the maintainer is not responding to RC bug reports, > and you don't realize a package you depend on has RC bugs. This happened > several times to me during the last freeze. Assuming you have your package and its dependencies and

Re: More 5 november in the release schedule

2016-11-07 Thread Brian May
Christian Seiler writes: > Why? Any package currently in testing still has time to enter > (until roughly end of this year), so it's not like there is no > heads-up for people. And RC bugs don't lead to immediate > removal from testing, you still have quite a bit of time until > they actually cau

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-11-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:26 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > Forced reboot on upgrade is damage. Let's learn from errors of others. needrestart has a mechanism (needrestart-session) to hook into user sessions, perhaps that could be extended to request users reboot for security updates. -- bye, pabs

Re: call for participation - Debian contributors survey, 1st ed.

2016-11-07 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 11:22:42PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > No logging or name is needed, with the set of questions in this survey > one only needs a bit of knowledge of Debian and its people to identify a > high amount of the survey takers, I think. (I still took it) This is becoming an FAQ,

Re: call for participation - Debian contributors survey, 1st ed.

2016-11-07 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 14484 March 1977, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Participation in the survey is completely anonymous, with no logging of > any provenance information (e.g., IP address, HTTP referrer), and all > questions are optional. No logging or name is needed, with the set of questions in this survey one only

Bug#843587: ITP: r-cran-randomfieldsutils -- utilities for the simulation and analysis of random fields

2016-11-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: r-cran-randomfieldsutils Version : 0.3.3.1 Upstream Author : Martin Schlather, Reinhard Furrer, Martin Kroll * URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=RandomFieldsUtils * License : GPL-3+

Re: libc recently more aggressive about pthread locks in stable ?

2016-11-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 06/11/16 at 17:41 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > It's worth noting that TSX is broken in 'Haswell' processors and is > > supposed to be disabled via a microcode update. I don't know whether > > glibc avoids using it on these proces

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-11-07 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Steve McIntyre schrieb: > Definitely. I think we've got general consenus here, and we should do > the following: > > * work on fixing some of the highlighted bugs in unattended-upgrades > > * enable it for installation via d-i by default. At installation >time, it should be enabled by defaul

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-11-07 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 11/04/2016 12:33 AM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > One side mark: once we start that, we might expose users to the public > that they run this, as then a lot of users will send a similar sized > packets to the internet! But i see no real security concern with that. where is the difference betwee

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-11-07 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 10:51:15PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 06:47:28PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >... > > * it will be a different experience compared to what people will get > >when installing Debian normally, using d-i / debootstrap. Most > >(all?) of our

Vitrine de Novidades. Confira!

2016-11-07 Thread Pague Menos
Ofertas Pague Menos body { margin-left: 0px; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; text-align: center; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; }

Re: NRSS has been deprecated [#696302]

2016-11-07 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 06:55:33PM +, Clint Adams wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 06:28:41AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > A maintainer would then file "ITR: dasher" and wait for responses before > > requesting RM. > > Why wouldn't you orphan first? It answers a different question. Orphan

Re: More 5 november in the release schedule

2016-11-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Christoph Biedl, on Mon 07 Nov 2016 19:02:17 +0100, wrote: > If I understood some remarks in IRC correctly: Filing an RC bug after > hard freeze may lead to immediate and thus irrevocable removal from > stretch[citation needed]. The removal is not immediate, you have time to downgrade the severity

Re: More 5 november in the release schedule

2016-11-07 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Christoph Biedl (2016-11-07 19:02:17) > If I understood some remarks in IRC correctly: Filing an RC bug after > hard freeze may lead to immediate and thus irrevocable removal from > stretch[citation needed]. If this was true, a malicious attacker could > abuse this to kick arbitrary pack

Re: More 5 november in the release schedule

2016-11-07 Thread Christoph Biedl
Ian Jackson wrote... > There's still big spikes in work for our core teams around deadlines, > so it's still best if people sort their stuff out earlier, but the new > arrangements are a big improvement IMO. ACK, and also looking at the way removals were handled in the past months (Like long grac

Bug#843546: ITP: python-mailman -- Core module for Mailman3

2016-11-07 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jan Luca Naumann * Package name: python-mailman Version : 3.1.0 Upstream Author : the Free Software Foundation, Inc. * URL : https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: Python Description

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-11-07 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 16:15:34 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 07.11.2016 um 15:55 schrieb Felipe Sateler: >> On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:07:50 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >> >> >>> See >>> https://blogs.gnome.org/lkundrak/2015/08/27/networkmanager-1-0-6- brings- >> metered-connections-api-and-more/ >

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-11-07 Thread Steve McIntyre
Lars Wirzenius wrote: >On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 06:47:28PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> One of the topics that we've been talking about yesterday is automatic >> software upgrades of cloud images. Some of the cloud platform >> providers really want this so that unsophisticated / inexperienced >>

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-11-07 Thread Steve McIntyre
Michael Biebl wrote: > >NetworkManager (since 1.0.6) exposes the information whether a >connection is metered. > >See >https://blogs.gnome.org/lkundrak/2015/08/27/networkmanager-1-0-6-brings-metered-connections-api-and-more/ > >This can be set explicitly by the user, e.g. for a WiFi connection. > >

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-11-07 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 07.11.2016 um 15:55 schrieb Felipe Sateler: > On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:07:50 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> See >> https://blogs.gnome.org/lkundrak/2015/08/27/networkmanager-1-0-6-brings- > metered-connections-api-and-more/ >> >> This can be set explicitly by the user, e.g. for a WiFi connecti

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-11-07 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:07:50 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 07.11.2016 um 14:48 schrieb Felipe Sateler: >> On Thu, 03 Nov 2016 18:47:28 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >>> To solve the issue and provide security updates by default, I'm >>> proposing that we should switch to installing unattende

Re: Bug#843185: ITP: aravis -- A vision library for genicam based cameras

2016-11-07 Thread Chiara Marmo
Hello Paul, very nice! Let me understand how it works and I will do it... :) Bye, Chiara - Original Message - > From: "Paul Wise" > To: "Chiara Marmo" , 843...@bugs.debian.org, > debian-devel@lists.debian.org, > debian-as...@lists.debian.org > Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 6:59:07 A

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-11-07 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 07.11.2016 um 14:48 schrieb Felipe Sateler: > On Thu, 03 Nov 2016 18:47:28 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> To solve the issue and provide security updates by default, I'm >> proposing that we should switch to installing unattended-upgrades by >> default (and enabling it too) *unless* somethin

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-11-07 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Quoting Felipe Sateler : Is there a way to mark network connections as "expensive", and thus u-a does nothing if only connected via that? It would be very annoying to have packages automatically downloaded when tethering my phone connection. Good point! Even Wifi might be cheap or expensive,

Re: libc recently more aggressive about pthread locks in stable ?

2016-11-07 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:02:56PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes ("Re: libc recently more aggressive > > about pthread locks in stable ?"): > > > And what should we do about Debian stretch, then? > > > > Perhaps we cou

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-11-07 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Thu, 03 Nov 2016 18:47:28 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > To solve the issue and provide security updates by default, I'm > proposing that we should switch to installing unattended-upgrades by > default (and enabling it too) *unless* something else in the > installation is already expected to de

Re: DEP 8: Gathering Django usage analytics

2016-11-07 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:05:18PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > https://github.com/django/deps/pull/31 If I understand this correctly, Django wants to gather usage statistics from installed Django instances, in a way that they say respects user privacy (though I failed to understand how, given a quic