Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Potter
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-grunt-cli
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Grunt Development Team (http://gruntjs.com/development-team)
* URL : https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-cli
* L
The Wanderer writes:
> A closed bug is presumptively a fixed bug (because bugs which have been
> fixed get closed).
I think this is only an assumption that would be made by someone who
wasn't familiar with bug tracking systems? There are usually a whole
bunch of different reasons to close a bug
On 2016-09-20 at 19:00, Santiago Vila wrote:
> [ Please don't Cc:me ]
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:29:14PM +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
>
>> Can you please explain to me how do you understand the following
>> statements in the DSC?
>
> Of course I can.
>
>> 3. We will not hide problems [..
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Steele
* Package name: sirikali
Version : 1.1.0-1
Upstream Author : Mhogo Mchungu
* URL : https://mhogomchungu.github.io/sirikali/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : manage user encrypted v
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:47:26PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Quoting m...@linux.it:
> > On Sep 20, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> > > Since it is in the queue, I have been able to improve it. The
> > > improvements add evenmore binary packages to this source package, so
> > > the new ver
[ Please don't Cc:me ]
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:29:14PM +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Can you please explain to me how do you understand the following statements in
> the DSC?
Of course I can.
>3. We will not hide problems [...]
This means the BTS is visible to everybody, even anonymou
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: go-wire
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : the Tendermint Project
* URL : https://github.com/tendermint/go-wire
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Go library for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chris Lamb
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: roughtime
Upstream Author : Google, Inc.
* URL : https://roughtime.googlesource.com/roughtime
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description :
On 09/20/2016 11:16 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>- powerpc: No porter (RM blocker)
I'd be happy to pick up powerpc to keep it for Stretch. I'm already
maintaining powerpcspe which is very similar to powerpc.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian
Sorry, I've promised not to react anymore to this subject, but I felt myself
obliged after the manifest and explicit violation, on my sense, of the DSC by
some people claiming that they contribute to Debian only for their own sake and
do not care about users frustration caused by their poor SW qual
ni...@thykier.net:
> Hi,
>
> Like last release, we are doing a roll call for porters of all release
> architectures. If you are an active porter behind one of the [release
> architectures] for the entire lifetime of Debian Stretch (est. end of
> 2020), please respond with a signed email containin
Aurelien Jarno:
> On 2016-08-17 22:05, ni...@thykier.net wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Like last release, we are doing a roll call for porters of all release
>> architectures. If you are an active porter behind one of the [release
>
Hi,
Apologies for the tardiness on my part for this.
> Does it really c
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gard Spreemann
* Package name: ripser
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Ulrich Bauer
* URL : http://ripser.org
* License : LGPL-3.0+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Software for computing persistent homology o
Quoting m...@linux.it:
On Sep 20, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Since it is in the queue, I have been able to improve it. The
improvements add evenmore binary packages to this source package, so
the new version would need to go through NEW again in any case.
I would just upload a new package by mergi
On Sep 20, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Since it is in the queue, I have been able to improve it. The
> improvements add evenmore binary packages to this source package, so
> the new version would need to go through NEW again in any case.
I would just upload a new package by merging the changelogs as
Le 20/09/2016 à 14:43, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
> [ this is more for -mentors I think.. ]
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 02:24:24PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>> 1- simply compile and upload normally
>
> .. with a new version ..
Thanks Rene,
uploaded.
>
>> 2- same as above, but using the -v o
[ this is more for -mentors I think.. ]
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 02:24:24PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> 1- simply compile and upload normally
.. with a new version ..
> 2- same as above, but using the -v option of dpkg-genchanges to
> include the full changelog in the changes file
unneeded.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi there,
I feel this question must be fairly simple, but I couldn't find the
answer anywhere I looked.
I have a package in NEW (lorene, to be precise). It's an entirely new
package.
Since it is in the queue, I have been able to improve it. The
im
Bart, you have taken the gift analogy in a too literal sense, but it's
just an analogy, and it may have its flaws.
Instead of a gift, I see it more like a fruit that you take from a tree.
The tree definitely does not expect anything from you in return, and
you don't owe anything to the tree. The
Steve Langasek schreef op 20-09-2016 1:26:
To summarize:
- Russ has patiently tried to help you understand why the relationship
between Debian and its users is *not* a customer-vendor
relationship, and
users do *not* have the right to expect that Debian, or a particular
Debian devel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Héctor Orón Martínez"
* Package name: osc-plugins-dput
Version : 20160627.0
Upstream Author : Collabora Ltd
* URL :
http://cgit.collabora.com/git/singularity/tools/osc-plugins-dput.git/
* License : GPL
Programming Lan
21 matches
Mail list logo
