Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I personally recommend using deb.debian.org.
That works nicely, thanks! Seems to have decent performance.
I couldn't find any announcement or documentation of this, other than
that on the site itself, though I did find a use of it in a recent
announcement of dbgsym packa
Sven Joachim:
> On 2016-07-06 02:51 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> This has happened now with the upload of dpkg 1.18.8.
>
> Anyone volunteering to upgrade the severity of those 82 bugs to serious?
>
> Cheers,
>Sven
>
>
> 1.
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?t
]] Josh Triplett
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > I'd not actively recommend people use httpredir.debian.org as it's
> > somewhat sporadically maintained.
>
> Do you have any more details on that? Does a better alternative exist?
I personally recommend using deb.debian.org.
> I still have hopes t
On 2016-07-06 02:51 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-04-03 at 17:29:32 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> The targets are "officially" mandatory and have been since 3.9.4
>> (released in September 2012). Currently lintian and dpkg still forgive
>> their absence to avoid auto-rejects and FTB
Steve McIntyre [2016-07-04 14:01:03+01] wrote:
> it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, [...] That's
> *basically* just like a normal jessie release, but with a few key
> updates:
>
> * backports kernel
> * rebuilt d-i to match that kernel
> * X drivers
> * ... (other things t
On 07/05/2016 07:43 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 04:15:36PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
Steve,
On 07/04/2016 10:01 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
A lot of arm64 machine users would benefit from this, and maybe owners
of very recent amd64 machines too.
ppc64el port would take b
Package: wnpp
Owner: Gijs Molenaar
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-as...@lists.debian.org,
debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: sagecal
Version : git, unversioned
Upstream Author : Sarod Yatawatta
* URL : https://sourcefo
Package: wnpp
Owner: Gijs Molenaar
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-as...@lists.debian.org,
debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: purify
Version : git, unversioned
Upstream Author : Rafael Carrillo, Jason McEwen, Yves Wiaux
* URL
Package: wnpp
Owner: Gijs Molenaar
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-as...@lists.debian.org,
debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: oskar
Version : 2.6.1
Upstream Author : The University of Oxford
* URL : http://www.oerc.ox.a
Package: wnpp
Owner: Gijs Molenaar
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-as...@lists.debian.org,
debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: wsclean
Version : 1.11
Upstream Author : André Offringa
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/proje
Package: wnpp
Owner: Gijs Molenaar
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-as...@lists.debian.org,
debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: casarest
Version : 1.4.1
Upstream Author : Gijs Molenaar
* URL : https://github.com/casacore/
Package: wnpp
Owner: Gijs Molenaar
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-as...@lists.debian.org,
debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: casasynthesis
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Gijs Molenaar
* URL : https://github.com/radio-
Package: wnpp
Owner: Gijs Molenaar
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-as...@lists.debian.org,
debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: aoflagger
Version : 2.8.0
Upstream Author : André Offringa
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/pr
Package: wnpp
Owner: Gijs Molenaar
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-as...@lists.debian.org,
debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-casacore
Version : 2.1.1
Upstream Author : Ger van Diepen, Malte Marquarding, Gijs Molenaar
* URL
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 08:55:39AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> ACK - I'm not wedded to the name in the slightest. It's more a
> proposal of what we're going to do.
ok, cool.
> >maybe "jessie+bpo-installer" would be a better fit?
> Maybe that fits, but it's horrid name.
I don't think it's tha
On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 08:55 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 07:33:38AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
[...]
> > I'd like to suggest *not* to call it jessie+half, as we have used
> >that term already (for etch+half) and there we had a frozen/stable kernel,
> >not a moving target
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 07:33:38AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 11:43:14PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >I assume "forking" the kernel for jessie+½ as done for etch-and-half is
>> >the plan already? (forking as in using a new source package…)
>> God, no - really *not* tha
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 11:43:14PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >I assume "forking" the kernel for jessie+½ as done for etch-and-half is
> >the plan already? (forking as in using a new source package…)
> God, no - really *not* that way at all. I'm thinking of using the
> kernel in backports at th
18 matches
Mail list logo
