Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anthony Fok
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: gly
Version : 0.0.3+git20160509.0.00bde29
Upstream Author : Jakub Pavlík
* URL : https://github.com/igneus/gly
* License : MIT
Programming La
On 20 May 2016 at 05:06, Neil Williams wrote:
>> My claim, as I'll outline below, is, if the upstream wants to give the
>> user an up-to-date software package, and they have to teach them how
>> to add a new archive, they'll give them an archive *they control*,
>> because they're now on the hook
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 718 (new: 4)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 178 (new: 1)
Total number of packages request
Hi people:
i'm a real person not machine, i'm from chile and i have a friend who
knows php, Java,bootstrap,html5,phonegap,laravel,codeigniter and many
others. He is a father of 2 kids and he is unemployed, could you give
him a work as a dedicated developer?
Ps: i can prove that i'm not a machine..
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-bioc-go.db
Version : 3.3.0
Upstream Author : Marc Carlson
* URL :
http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/data/annotation/html/GO.db.html
* License : Artistic-2.0
Programming Lang: GNU
On Thu, 19 May 2016 11:46:53 -0400
Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> [cc'ing devel, since this is a rant that involves technical topics,
> and god knows I only go on so many rants a year these days]
First off, I have gone down the road of trying to setup apt sources in
from the install of another packag
[cc'ing devel, since this is a rant that involves technical topics, and
god knows I only go on so many rants a year these days]
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 05:18:28PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> b) many upstreams appear frustrated about getting their package
> officially supported in Debian.
Yeah,
Daily break with style
Break out of your daily routine and rejoice in moments of pure
relaxation at Hotel Phoenix! You deserve it!
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:19:24PM +0200, Pierre Ynard wrote:
> Is that kind of downgrade supposed to be supported?
No, it is not supposed to be supported.
> I encountered configuration migration problems for apt and postfix,
> shall I file bugs for these?
Probably not.
This is a seldom used f
I've successfully downgraded most of my system from unstable to jessie,
so this seems to be workable.
Among the things I run, there's only MySQL that can't be downgraded just
like that from unstable's 5.6 to jessie's 5.5, and for which there is
no backport of 5.6; and also libstdc++6 that I can't
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-cran-princurve
Version : 1.1-12-1
Upstream Author : Andreas Weingessel
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/princurve/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: GNU R
Description
Verlaag uw drinkwaterfactuur
Kies voor een SipWell waterkoeler
En bied uw klanten en werknemers water van bronkwaliteit
Ontdek alle voordelen
Waarom kiezen voor SipWell waterkoelers?
-Unieke designs voor elk interieur
-Geen zorgen om levering en facturatie
On Thu, 19 May 2016, Ian Jackson wrote:
> So you have a broader idea of what should be RC, in abstract terms,
> than I do.
>
> But, do you think that this specific bug should be RC ?
>From a cursory look at it, yes, I would say so.
And the patch looks like really short, so not too hard to mainta
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Debian i386 architecture now requires a 686-class
processor"):
> Agreed. For me, the RC severity means "this should be fixed (before next
> stable release)". The possibility of auto-removal implemented by the
> release team is just a tool to make sure that either the b
Package: wnpp
Owner: Filip Hroch
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc:debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-as...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: Munipack
Version : 0.5.7
Upstream Author : Filip Hroch
* URL : http://munipack.physics.muni.cz/
* License : GPL-3
Pro
Hi,
On Thu, 19 May 2016, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> If we treated architectures in the same way, I wonder if we would have
> any architecture other than amd64... After all that will guide our
> users to other, working, architectures.
>
> (No, I don't find "let's just drop Qt/GNOME/X11/ncurses" a
16 matches
Mail list logo
