Re: Packaging of static libraries

2016-04-18 Thread Alexander Cherepanov
On 2016-04-13 17:19, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2016-04-13 12:40:39 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: Vincent Lefevre writes ("Re: Packaging of static libraries"): Note that by default, shared libraries would still be used, so that this would affect only users with specific applications, who would want

Re: Packaging of static libraries

2016-04-18 Thread Alexander Cherepanov
On 2016-04-13 15:29, Ian Jackson wrote: Adam Borowski writes ("Re: Packaging of static libraries"): On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:52:33PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: I'm afraid that LTO is probably too dangerous to be used as a substitute for static linking. See my comments in the recent LTO thread

Bug#821461: ITP: pysword -- A native Python reader for SWORD Project Bible Modules

2016-04-18 Thread Raoul Snyman
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist A native Python reader of the SWORD Project Bible Modules This project is not an official CrossWire project. It merely provides an alternative way to read the bible modules created by CrossWires SWORD project. Licensed under the GPLv2 pysword can be downloaded f

Bug#821460: ITP: salt-formula-ceilometer -- Salt formula for OpenStack Ceilometer

2016-04-18 Thread Filip Pytloun
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Filip Pytloun * Package name: salt-formula-ceilometer Version : 2016.4.1 Upstream Author : tcpcloud * URL : https://github.com/openstack/salt-formula-ceilometer * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: SaltStack Desc

Re: Bug#821035: ITP: luksipc -- LUKS in-place conversion tool

2016-04-18 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Apr 17 2016, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:06:51PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: >> * Package name: luksipc >> Version : 0.04 >> Upstream Author : Johannes Bauer >> * URL : http://johannes-bauer.com/linux/luksipc/ >> * License : GPL-3 >> P

Re: Time for a .changes file format 2.0?

2016-04-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Guillem Jover, on Mon 18 Apr 2016 10:50:54 +0200, wrote: > Samuel Thibault recently reported in #818618 that the Binary field in > the .changes files does not get filtered to only include the binary > packages that are being uploaded, Well, yes, but the original issue is only that it also

Time for a .changes file format 2.0?

2016-04-18 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! Samuel Thibault recently reported in #818618 that the Binary field in the .changes files does not get filtered to only include the binary packages that are being uploaded, as documented in the ancient doc/programming.sgml in dpkg 1.3.3 [P], current debian-policy and now in the dpkg deb-changes

Re: Debian policy recommended snippet prevents building packages from external Makefile

2016-04-18 Thread Emmanuel Kasper
On 04/14/2016 03:27 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Emmanuel Kasper , 2016-04-14, 13:29: >> in the Debian policy 4.9.1 we recommend to add build flags as such: >> >> MAKEFLAGS += -j$(NUMJOBS) >> >> and I guess most packages, like tar, will then call >> >> $(MAKE) $(MAKEFLAGS) > > You don't need to pa

Re: Using perl to build perl

2016-04-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 04:49:46PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > I presume that once all of this is done, debhelper can then depend on > "perl | perl-stage1", which would allow the normal perl packages to > build-depend on debhelper. This all seems unnecessary nowadays. debhelper is Multi-Arch: f