Bug#820851: ITP: sprai -- single-pass sequencing read accuracy improver

2016-04-12 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Med Packaging Team * Package name: sprai Version : 0.9.9.12 Upstream Author : Takamasa Imai * URL : http://zombie.cb.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/sprai/index.html * License : MIT Programming Lang: C, Perl, Python Descripti

Bug#820848: ITP: phcpack -- General-purpose solver for polynomial systems

2016-04-12 Thread Doug Torrance
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Doug Torrance * Package name: phcpack Version : 2.4.14 Upstream Author : Jan Verschelde * URL : https://github.com/janverschelde/PHCpack * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: Ada Description : General-purpose solv

Re: gitlab package (was Re: Opt out style recommends)

2016-04-12 Thread Michael Lustfield
On Apr 12, 2016 00:34, "Tollef Fog Heen" wrote: > > ]] Michael Lustfield > > > In this particular case, I would suggest first making letsencrypt a > > Suggests. Then, I would suggest considering snakeoil for the https or > > just installing with http-only and providing a documented tool for > > mo

Bug#820821: ITP: magit-svn -- git-svn extension for magit, a git interface for emacs.

2016-04-12 Thread Alberto Luaces
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alberto Luaces * Package name: magit-svn Version : 2.1.1 Upstream Author : The Magit Project Contributors * URL : https://magit.vc/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: elisp Description : git-svn extension for magit

Re: Packaging of static libraries

2016-04-12 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:52:33PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Vincent Lefevre writes ("Re: Packaging of static libraries"): > > On 2016-04-10 14:28:02 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > > > (1) When performance matters. Here we need the static library to be > > > built without position independent

Bug#820810: ITP: art-nextgen-simulation-tools -- simulation tools to generate synthetic next-generation sequencing reads

2016-04-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: art-nextgen-simulation-tools Version : 3.19.15 Upstream Author : Weichun Huang * URL : http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/software/biostatistics/art/ * License : GPL Programming

Re: Packaging of static libraries

2016-04-12 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2016-04-12 14:52:33 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > I'm afraid that LTO is probably too dangerous to be used as a > substitute for static linking. See my comments in the recent LTO > thread here, where I referred to the problem of undefined behaviour, > and pointed at John Regehr's blog. This is n

Re: Packaging of static libraries

2016-04-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Vincent Lefevre writes ("Re: Packaging of static libraries"): > On 2016-04-10 14:28:02 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > > (1) When performance matters. Here we need the static library to be > > built without position independent code. This can still give several > > percent gains depending on arc

Bug#820801: ITP: ruby-mixlib-versioning -- Ruby library allowing to parse, compare and manipulate version strings

2016-04-12 Thread Hleb Valoshka
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> * Package name: ruby-mixlib-versioning Version : 1.1.0 Upstream Author : OpsCode, Inc * URL : https://github.com/opscode/mixlib-versioning * License : Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: Ruby

Re: Opt out style recommends

2016-04-12 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Ben Hutchings , 2016-04-11, 02:22: Would it be useful to have a linker option to omit a NEEDED entry for a particular library?  The application could then call dlopen("libfoo.so.42", RTLD_NOW|RTLD_GLOBAL) before it starts using the library, typically right before calling foo_init(), but it wo

Re: Packaging of static libraries

2016-04-12 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2016-04-10 14:28:02 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > (1) When performance matters. Here we need the static library to be > built without position independent code. This can still give several > percent gains depending on arch / programming language. Yes, but in that case, the best thing to do

Bug#820779: ITP: golang-github-masterzen-xmlpath -- subset of the XPath specification for Go

2016-04-12 Thread Daniel Stender
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Daniel Stender Control: block 808773 by -1 * Package name: golang-github-masterzen-xmlpath Version : 0.0~git20140218.13f4951 Upstream Author : Gustavo Niemeyer * URL : https://github.com/masterzen/xmlpath * License : LGP

Re: gitlab package (was Re: Opt out style recommends)

2016-04-12 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Michael Lustfield > In this particular case, I would suggest first making letsencrypt a > Suggests. Then, I would suggest considering snakeoil for the https or > just installing with http-only and providing a documented tool for > moving to using letsencrypt. You and I both know that we're onl

Re: gitlab package (was Re: Opt out style recommends)

2016-04-12 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Pirate Praveen > On 2016, ഏപ്രിൽ 11 3:44:09 PM IST, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > >I'd really like this to be an optional addon, since there's no way you > >could know how to integrate with how I acquire my certs. I also > >question whether it's the job of an application to set up > >certificates

Bug#820777: ITP: gradle-plugin-protobuf -- Protobuf Plugin for Gradle

2016-04-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Emmanuel Bourg * Package name: gradle-plugin-protobuf Version : 0.9.2 Upstream Author : Alex Antonov * URL : https://github.com/aantono/gradle-plugin-protobuf * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Groovy Descript