On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 21:25:26 -0700
Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> Hi, all,
> The package in question, circlator, depends on two
> architecture-dependent packages that can only build on amd64 and
> kfreebsd-amd64 currently. The package cannot migrate to testing
> because those dependencies are not availa
1. LTO object format is not stable and ABI-persistent: e.g., LTO
objects compiled with gcc 5.2 may not work when using gcc 5.3
(versions are just for example). Ref: gcc doc.
2. Slim LTO objects are usable only with GCC of same version (see
above). To provide wider support, you'll need to ship fat L
Hi, all,
The package in question, circlator, depends on two
architecture-dependent packages that can only build on amd64 and
kfreebsd-amd64 currently. The package cannot migrate to testing because
those dependencies are not available for i386 [1].
I am hoping there is a better solution to this pro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)"
* Package name: python-feather-format
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Wes McKinney
* URL : https://github.com/wesm/feather
* License : Apache-2
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Pyth
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tianon Gravi
* Package name: containerd
Version : 0.0.5
Upstream Author : Docker, Inc
* URL : https://containerd.tools
* License : Apache-2.0, CC-BY-SA-4.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description : A daemon to control ru
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:27:20PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Steffen Möller , 2016-03-29, 16:27:
> >I admit to be a fan of link time optimisation and would like to see this
> >challenge promoted towards more of a routine challenge to establish for
> >our packages.
>
> gcc-5 manpage says: "Link-
* Steffen Möller , 2016-03-29, 16:27:
I admit to be a fan of link time optimisation and would like to see
this challenge promoted towards more of a routine challenge to
establish for our packages.
gcc-5 manpage says: "Link-time optimization does not work well with
generation of debugging info
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 09:02:13AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Steffen Möller wrote:
> > I admit to be a fan of link time optimisation and would like to see this
> > challenge promoted towards more of a routine challenge to establish for
> > our packages. I found this informative thread
> >
> > h
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel
* Package name: impressive-display
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Mike Gabriel
* URL : https://code.it-zukunft-schule.de/cgit/impressive-display/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Bash
Description
Package: general
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* CLI command "shutdown -r now" USUALLY does not work, since systemd replaced
sysvinit in Debian 8 "jessie".
Posted problem on http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/debian-26/used-to-
shutdown-reboot-from-cli-but-since-systemd-replaced-init-shu
Steffen Möller wrote:
> I admit to be a fan of link time optimisation and would like to see this
> challenge promoted towards more of a routine challenge to establish for
> our packages. I found this informative thread
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/06/msg00181.html
>
> that in part
On Mar 29, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Spending most of my Debian time with scientific packages, I see a gain
> of speed on those routines as particularly rewarding. And this may also
> be a feature that would attract many to our platform as an extra
> advantage over the regular self-built or downloa
Hello,
I admit to be a fan of link time optimisation and would like to see this
challenge promoted towards more of a routine challenge to establish for
our packages. I found this informative thread
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/06/msg00181.html
that in particular sees the challenge
13 matches
Mail list logo
