E-Learning Management Solutions & Development Packages !!

2016-03-20 Thread Anu
Hello, I am Anupreet (*Senior Moodle consultant*) We are an expert team of more than 16 developers with a combined experience of more than 82 years. We are completely focused on following the best practices of Moodle and always giving best learning management system experience to all our clients.

Re: Mass Bug Filing: Missing Build-Depends: graphviz

2016-03-20 Thread Bas Wijnen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:07:55PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 06:51:23PM +, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > That also means that programs calling dot will need graphviz in their > > Build-Depends, no matter what the default is. >

Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but not firefox/firefox-esr

2016-03-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Josh Triplett wrote: > Ah. So I assume that packages using versioned Provides probably > shouldn't get uploaded to the archive until that happens? There are already packages in the archive using versioned Provides: libjpeg62, python cffi packages, several php pac

Build failures with libc6 2.23 from experimental

2016-03-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
I compiled unstable with libc6 2.23 (2.23-0experimental0) from experimental. I filed the following build failures: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=2.23;users=debian-gl...@lists.debian.org -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/

Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but not firefox/firefox-esr

2016-03-20 Thread Josh Triplett
James McCoy wrote: > On Mar 20, 2016 4:31 PM, "Ben Hutchings" wrote: > > On Sun, 2016-03-20 at 12:39 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > Ian Jackson wrote: > > > > The Wanderer writes ("Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel > > > > but not firefox/firefox-esr"): > > > > > Now, one thing

Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but not firefox/firefox-esr

2016-03-20 Thread James McCoy
On Mar 20, 2016 4:31 PM, "Ben Hutchings" wrote: > > On Sun, 2016-03-20 at 12:39 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Ian Jackson wrote: > > > > > > The Wanderer writes ("Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but not firefox/firefox-esr"): > > > > > > > > Now, one thing which seems like it _

Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but not firefox/firefox-esr

2016-03-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2016-03-20 at 12:39 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > Ian Jackson wrote: > > > > The Wanderer writes ("Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but > > not firefox/firefox-esr"): > > > > > > Now, one thing which seems like it _could_ fix this without requiring a > > > MBF would be f

Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but not firefox/firefox-esr

2016-03-20 Thread Josh Triplett
Ian Jackson wrote: > The Wanderer writes ("Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but > not firefox/firefox-esr"): > > Now, one thing which seems like it _could_ fix this without requiring a > > MBF would be for firefox and firefox-esr to acquire 'Provides: > > iceweasel'. That seems li

Re: Mass Bug Filing: Missing Build-Depends: graphviz

2016-03-20 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 06:51:23PM +, Bas Wijnen wrote: > That also means that programs calling dot will need graphviz in their > Build-Depends, no matter what the default is. As is, a number of them do call dot without the build-dependency. > > But this is inconsistent with having graphviz i

Re: Mass Bug Filing: Missing Build-Depends: graphviz

2016-03-20 Thread Bas Wijnen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think you are mistaken about a few things. On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 06:04:55PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > The maintainer points out that the default value for HAVE_DOT is NO, > so he's reluctant to add the build-dependency. If the program can be

Re: Mass Bug Filing: Missing Build-Depends: graphviz

2016-03-20 Thread Santiago Vila
Ok, this is postponed for now. One of the bugs I was going to report was already reported: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778478 The maintainer points out that the default value for HAVE_DOT is NO, so he's reluctant to add the build-dependency. But this is only true in doxyge

Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but not firefox/firefox-esr

2016-03-20 Thread Ian Jackson
The Wanderer writes ("Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but not firefox/firefox-esr"): > Now, one thing which seems like it _could_ fix this without requiring a > MBF would be for firefox and firefox-esr to acquire 'Provides: > iceweasel'. That seems like a misuse of the system to

Bug#818786: ITP: node-get-stdin -- Get stdin as a string or buffer

2016-03-20 Thread Jonathan Ulrich Horn
Package: wnpp Serverity: wishlist Owner: Jonathan Ulrich Horn X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-get-stdin Version : 5.0.1 Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus * URL : https://github.com/sindresorhus/get-stdin * License : Expat Descr

Re: Mass Bug Filing: Missing Build-Depends: graphviz

2016-03-20 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 02:31:23PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > There are 358 packages in unstable that currently have B-D/B-D-I: doxygen > but no B-D/B-D-I: graphviz. But my guess is that not all of them (probably > not even most of them) actually run dot during Doxygen build. > > Of those, 2

Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but not firefox/firefox-esr

2016-03-20 Thread The Wanderer
On 2016-03-20 at 06:43, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Josh Triplett , 2016-03-18, 15:06: >> Firefox addon packages (xul-ext-*) typically have a Depends on >> iceweasel, sometimes with alternatives for icedove or other >> supported packages that can use the addon. With the switch to >> firefox and firefo

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-20 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 14247 March 1977, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > I've just activated a few changes to the archive we talk(ed) about for a > long time. And while it is not exactly the start of this release cycle, > it should still work out nicely (so one hopes). Tuesday to now - i think the majority of what breaks wit

Re: Mass Bug Filing: Missing Build-Depends: graphviz

2016-03-20 Thread Christian Seiler
On 03/20/2016 01:52 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > There seems to be more than ten packages which: > > * Have doxygen in Build-Depends. > * Do not have graphviz in Build-Depends. > * Try to run "dot" during the build. > * The build does not fail because doxygen keeps working as if > nothing bad happ

Mass Bug Filing: Missing Build-Depends: graphviz

2016-03-20 Thread Santiago Vila
Greetings. There seems to be more than ten packages which: * Have doxygen in Build-Depends. * Do not have graphviz in Build-Depends. * Try to run "dot" during the build. * The build does not fail because doxygen keeps working as if nothing bad happened, violating Policy 4.6. (This is already

Re: a poll for Dgit workflows

2016-03-20 Thread Ian Jackson
Daniel Stender writes ("a poll for Dgit workflows"): > I've experimented with applying `gbp import-orig` on an extra > upstream branch and merging into e.g. dgit/sid, but this seems to be > substandard because `dgit quilt-fixup` wants to quiltify all the > changes in the working tree, which isn't w

Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but not firefox/firefox-esr

2016-03-20 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 at 11:43:54 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Also, why there are two firefox* packages, and what's the difference between > them? (They have identical descriptions...) As far as I understand it (not a Mozilla maintainer): firefox-esr is the Extended Support Release version

Bug#818396: ITP: fuel-ui -- OpenStack Fuel deployment server - Web GUI

2016-03-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: fuel-ui Version : 9.0~0+2016.03.15.git.74d6c7a29b Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation * URL : https://github.com/openstack/fuel-ui * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: JavaScript,

Bug#818409: ITP: puppet-module-saz-rsyslog -- Puppet module for rsyslog

2016-03-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: puppet-module-saz-rsyslog Version : 2.2.1 Upstream Author : Steffen Zieger * URL : https://github.com/saz/puppet-rsyslog * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Ruby, Puppet Descriptio

Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but not firefox/firefox-esr

2016-03-20 Thread Jakub Wilk
Can someone explain why we are bringing Firefox back? Are we going to rename it again if^Wwhen Mozilla stops liking us? Also, why there are two firefox* packages, and what's the difference between them? (They have identical descriptions...) * Josh Triplett , 2016-03-18, 15:06: Firefox addon p

Bug#818547: RFH: vpnc -- Cisco-compatible VPN client

2016-03-20 Thread Florian Schlichting
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request assistance with maintaining the vpnc package. I'm no longer actively using it, and I never got around to learn enough about ipsec to really understand what's going on and (sometimes) going wrong. Hence I feel I'm unable to properly debug and support some ki

Bug#818408: ITP: puppet-module-aodh -- Puppet module for OpenStack Aodh

2016-03-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: puppet-module-aodh Version : 8.0.0~b1 Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation * URL : https://github.com/openstack/puppet-aodh * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Ruby, Puppet Descr

Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but not firefox/firefox-esr

2016-03-20 Thread Niels Thykier
David Prévot: > Le 18/03/2016 18:06, Josh Triplett a écrit : > >> I would suggest that Firefox addon packages should depend on "firefox | >> firefox-esr" > > Most of those packages are mozilla-devscripts for the build and just > need to be rebuilt to get fixed. Even if our infrastructure has all