Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: sahara-dashboard
Version : 4.0.0~b2
Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/sahara-dashboard
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Descript
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: airlift-slice
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : David Phillips, Dain Sundstrom, Martin Traverso
* URL : https://github.com/airlift/slice
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Desc
Le 9 avril 2015 18:05:50 GMT+02:00, "Pierre-Elliott Bécue" a
écrit :
>Source: grub
>Version: 2.02~beta2-22
>Severity: important
>
>Dear maintainer,
>
>I've met a bug in GRUB under a Proxmox environment, which I was able to
>reproduce under a clean Debian system (my laptop, under jessie).
>
>With
Hi Bastien,
> Newer unstable Lintian version check now package testsuite for licence
> problems/missing source
Just FYI, the potential 'source-is-missing' false positive mentioned at
the beginning of #798900 [1] still exists, regarding the automatic
flagging of JS files with lines > 512 chars as
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 11:49 +1100, Brian May wrote:
import subprocess
rv = subprocess.Popen(['locale', '-a'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
> ... stderr=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0]
type(rv)
>
>
> This is
On 2016-01-26 14:41, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Bas Couwenberg , 2016-01-26, 12:17:
The use of Multi-Arch: no was suggested by
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/old-style-config-script-multiarch-path.html
The wording is unfortunate.
You should not add "Multi-Arch: no" to the control file, but instead
* Bas Couwenberg , 2016-01-26, 12:17:
The use of Multi-Arch: no was suggested by
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/old-style-config-script-multiarch-path.html
The wording is unfortunate.
You should not add "Multi-Arch: no" to the control file, but instead
remove the field, because "no" is the
On 2016-01-26 12:10, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Sebastiaan Couwenberg , 2016-01-26, 07:45:
The use of Multi-Arch: no was suggested by
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/old-style-config-script-multiarch-path.html
The wording is unfortunate.
You should not add "Multi-Arch: no" to the control file, but
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
> On 25-01-16 19:47, Bastien Roucaries wrote:
>> I expect more problems detected in the next few days
>
> I guess the autorejects for Multi-Arch: no are among those problems.
> The use of Multi-Arch: no was suggested by
>
> https://l
* Sebastiaan Couwenberg , 2016-01-26, 07:45:
The use of Multi-Arch: no was suggested by
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/old-style-config-script-multiarch-path.html
The wording is unfortunate.
You should not add "Multi-Arch: no" to the control file, but instead
remove the field, because "no"
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jon Sneyers
* Package name: flif
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Jon Sneyers
* URL : http://flif.info/
* License : Currently: GPLv3+ (encoder), LGPLv3+ (decoder)
(will probably change soon to more p
11 matches
Mail list logo