Lucas Nussbaum:
> On 28/12/15 at 14:24 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>>> qa-vcs_but_not_git_or_svn.txt (290 packages)
>>>
>>>The package is maintained using a VCS, which is not either Git or SVN.
>>
>> This one is really bellow pedantic...
>
> I agree. And this could also apply to "still usi
Hi,
in response to bug#752134 I implemented a little sha256sums $(find|grep)
logic to create a file "extrafiles" in the top level of our mirror tree.
The intention is to list all files that, unlike Packages and their
files, aren't otherwise verifyable via existing signatures already.
This appears
Russ Allbery:
> I think it's correctly doing what it should in the situation
> described in this thread.
Okay, so what I said is what I saw. And deciding if it is true or not
has always been your choice.
Ralf Mardorf:
> Seemingly you can't provide new arguments, so you should expect to
> get
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:30 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi debian-sparc and others!
>
> Here's my first attempt for a sparc64 netinst image:
>
>> https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/debian-cd/
>
> This has not been tested _at all_ a
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 04:59:31PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Artur R. Czechowski , 2015-12-28, 16:17:
> >- rrdcollect http://bugs.debian.org/809234
> ITYM #809235
Indeed.
Cheers
Artur
--
Po co mamy ze sobą rozmawiać, skoro tak łatwo się komunikować?
* Artur R. Czechowski , 2015-12-28, 16:17:
- rrdcollect http://bugs.debian.org/809234
ITYM #809235
--
Jakub Wilk
Dear DDs,
Due to lack of resources I am unable at this moment to maintain mine packages
properly. So, I am looking for a new maintainers for packages:
- imms http://bugs.debian.org/809233
- lwatch http://bugs.debian.org/809234
- rrdcollect http://bugs.debian.org/809234
If you like, y
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 28/12/15 at 14:24 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> > qa-vcs_but_not_git_or_svn.txt (290 packages)
>> >
>> >The package is maintained using a VCS, which is not either Git or SVN.
>>
>> This one is really bellow pedantic...
>
> I agre
On 28/12/15 at 14:24 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > qa-vcs_but_not_git_or_svn.txt (290 packages)
> >
> >The package is maintained using a VCS, which is not either Git or SVN.
>
> This one is really bellow pedantic...
I agree. And this could also apply to "still using classic debhelper"
a
On 28/12/15 at 14:24 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> *On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following my blog post yesterday with updated graphs about Debian
> > packaging evolution[1], I prepared lists of packages for each kind of
> > "outdatedness". Of course
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: python-nmea2
Version: 1.5.1
Upstream Author: Tom Flanagan
URL: https://github.com/Knio/pynmea2
License: MIT
Description: Python library for the NMEA 0183 protocol
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP dig
*On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following my blog post yesterday with updated graphs about Debian
> packaging evolution[1], I prepared lists of packages for each kind of
> "outdatedness". Of course not all practices highlighted below are
> deprecated, and there a
On 28/12/15 at 13:23 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 12:20:21PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Excluding duplicates, a total of 5469 packages are listed. The dd-list for
> > the
> > merged list is available at
> > https://people.debian.org/~lucas/qa-20151226/merged.ddlist (
On Dec 28, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Hmm... Are you suggesting that "hello-traditional" should be converted to dh?
>
> I have mixed feelings about putting in the same bag things which are
> clearly bugs with things which are not necessarily bugs.
Indeed. So far I have not seen compelling arguments
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>The originals of several of these functions seem to appear (with
>>non-DFSG-free licensing) in the appendices of
>>http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/font/5015.Type1_Supp.pdf
>>
>>In particular, the licensing says:
>>
>
On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 12:20:21PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Excluding duplicates, a total of 5469 packages are listed. The dd-list for the
> merged list is available at
> https://people.debian.org/~lucas/qa-20151226/merged.ddlist (which isn't very
> useful, except to know if you are listed; s
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 09:41:49 -0200
Herbert Fortes (hpfn) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All packages I maintain are on the list. Including
Which list?
https://people.debian.org/~lucas/qa-20151226/allpackages-20151226.yaml
is the input list of everything, irrespective of whether anything is
wrong. You'd expe
17 matches
Mail list logo
