On Sat, 19 Dec 2015, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> The changes to the subdirectories below pool/ might also affect people
> maintaining (partial) private mirrors of the security archive. They
> would need to update what they mirror for the next release.
We should also make the canonical root of the
Niels,
On 20 December 2015 at 22:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 20 December 2015 at 22:24, Niels Thykier wrote:
| | And what version of lintian is this? If you are using lintian from
| | unstable or stable-backports, you shouldn't be seeing these warnings.
|
| I see.
|
| | I am sorry, I
Robie Basak writes:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 03:08:51PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> I'll repeat this one last time for you: If A suggests B, and you
>> install B in some way, you may have come to rely on the fact that A is
>> extended by B on your system. Automatically removing B could
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 03:08:51PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> I'll repeat this one last time for you: If A suggests B, and you
> install B in some way, you may have come to rely on the fact that A is
> extended by B on your system. Automatically removing B could thus
> cause an unexpected
Hi,
On 07/12/2015 16:23, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
>
> The change done in unison 2.48 to overcome this looks pretty big... I'm
> not sure I'll be able/willing to provide a unison2.40.102 any more.
> Moreover, this package was created to provide compatibility with
> previous Debian releases, but anot
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Med Packaging Team
Control: block 395843 by -1
* Package name: falconkit
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Jason Chin
* URL : https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/FALCON
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: fsa
Version : 1.15.9
Upstream Author : Ariel Schwartz, Chuong Do, Robert Bradley, Jaeyoung Do,
Colin Dewey, Ian Holmes, Lars Barquist
* URL : http://fsa.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Pr
Your message dated Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:29:28 +0100
with message-id <56785318.60...@sourcepole.ch>
and subject line Re: Bug#808182: general: realtek Hight definition audio not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #808295,
regarding general: sound and locale dependency
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:29:28 +0100
with message-id <56785318.60...@sourcepole.ch>
and subject line Re: Bug#808182: general: realtek Hight definition audio not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #808182,
regarding general: realtek Hight definition audio not found
to be marked as
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: locutusofb...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: knock
* Version: 3.0.0
* Upstream Author : Gianni Amato
* URL: https://github.com/guelfoweb/knock
* License: GPL-3+
* Programming Lang: Pyth
Anthony DeRobertis:
> Are there plans to teach httpredir.debian.org about the new debug mirror
> network?
>
> http://httpredir.debian.org/debian-debug/dists/unstable-debug/main/binary-amd64/Release
> is currently 404.
>
Thanks for the suggestion.
I have filed a request for it in [1] - patches
Are there plans to teach httpredir.debian.org about the new debug mirror
network?
http://httpredir.debian.org/debian-debug/dists/unstable-debug/main/binary-amd64/Release
is currently 404.
On Mon, 2015-12-21 at 17:03 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:57:39PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > Hi Julian
> >
> > On Mon, 2015-12-21 at 16:13 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > > I also wrote I am thinking about adding some kind of apt revert command
> > >
Hi,
Quoting Julian Andres Klode (2015-12-21 13:43:41)
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:35:21PM +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> > Julian Andres Klode:
> > > It just happens that some of the newly installed dependencies are also
> > > Suggested by other installed packages, and thus are not remove
On lunes, 21 de diciembre de 2015 16:10:31 (CET) Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode:
> > If A suggests B, and you install B in some way, you may have come to
> > rely on the fact that A is extended by B on your system.
> > Automatically removing B could thus cause an unexpected
Hi Julian
On Mon, 2015-12-21 at 16:13 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> I also wrote I am thinking about adding some kind of apt revert command
> that allows you to revert entries from apt's history.log, which would allow
> you to undo install commands.
That will be really a great feature. I was
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:57:39PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Hi Julian
>
> On Mon, 2015-12-21 at 16:13 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > I also wrote I am thinking about adding some kind of apt revert command
> > that allows you to revert entries from apt's history.log, which would allo
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:37:40PM +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode:
> > Usually it is a Suggests from another existing package.
>
> If I run "apt-cache depends gnome-shell", it says:
> Recommends: gdm
> Breaks: gdm
>
> Is this normal, having a package both as recommende
Julian Andres Klode:
It does not show you version numbers. gnome-shell recommends gdm,
because it works best with it, and breaks old gdm versions it does
not work with.
Okay. Thank you.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:37:40PM +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode:
> > Usually it is a Suggests from another existing package.
>
> If I run "apt-cache depends gnome-shell", it says:
> Recommends: gdm
> Breaks: gdm
>
> Is this normal, having a package both as recommende
Julian Andres Klode:
> Usually it is a Suggests from another existing package.
If I run "apt-cache depends gnome-shell", it says:
Recommends: gdm
Breaks: gdm
Is this normal, having a package both as recommended and as breaking?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:10:31PM +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode:
> > If A suggests B, and you install B in some way, you may have come to
> > rely on the fact that A is extended by B on your system.
> > Automatically removing B could thus cause an unexpected loss of
>
Julian Andres Klode:
> If A suggests B, and you install B in some way, you may have come to
> rely on the fact that A is extended by B on your system.
> Automatically removing B could thus cause an unexpected loss of
> functionality.
The point I do not understand is why after removing A, being A
On 21 December 2015 at 14:59, Alberto Salvia Novella
wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode:
>>
>> autoremove will remove all packages that no other package
>> PreDepends, Depends, Recommends, or Suggests.
>
>
> Probably the problem is the latest.
>
> Since I did not install other package apart from cortina
Julian Andres Klode:
autoremove will remove all packages that no other package
PreDepends, Depends, Recommends, or Suggests.
Probably the problem is the latest.
Since I did not install other package apart from cortina, probably what
is holding back gdm is a package already present in the syst
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: IOhannes m zmoelnig
* Package name: juce
Version : 4.1
Upstream Author : Julian Storer
* URL : http://www.juce.com
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Jules' Utility Class Extensions
JUCE (Jules'
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tristan Seligmann
* Package name: python-flaky
Version : 3.0.1
Upstream Author : Box
* URL : https://github.com/box/flaky
* License : Apache License
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Plugin for nose or py.te
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:35:21PM +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode:
> > It just happens that some of the newly installed dependencies are also
> > Suggested by other installed packages, and thus are not removed,
> > because you might have installed the package in order to
Julian Andres Klode:
> It just happens that some of the newly installed dependencies are also
> Suggested by other installed packages, and thus are not removed,
> because you might have installed the package in order to extend the
> functionality of another installed package suggesting it.
sudo a
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Are the *-debug suites going to stay in a separate repository? If so,
> is a separate mirror network being set up? I help maintain a public
> mirror of the 'debian' repository, and if possible I'd like to setup a
> mirror of the 'debian-debug' reposit
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 18:45:57 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> On Fri Dec 04, 2015 at 16:27:17 +0800, Shih-Yuan Lee (FourDollars) wrote:
> >My friend from Microsoft shared
> >[1]https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/debian-images-now-available-o
> >n-azure/ to me.
> >Maybe the prob
31 matches
Mail list logo
