Re: Upcoming version of apt-file - using apt-acquire and incompatibilities

2015-12-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > This works perfectly for binary packages' Contents, but (at least on my > machine) APT downloads whole Contents-source every time. > > There's clearly a bug somewhere (APT? dak?), but I don't have time to debug > it further. I very rarely need C

Bug#807702: ITP: django-user-accounts -- infrastructure for dealing with user accounts

2015-12-11 Thread Michael Fladischer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Fladischer -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: django-user-accounts Version : 1.3.1 Upstream Author : Brian Rosner * URL : https://github.com/pinax/django-user-accounts * License : Ex

Re: sid on openvz

2015-12-11 Thread James Cloos
> "AJ" == Aurelien Jarno writes: AJ> If you consider Debian "stable" as too archaic, I am missing words to AJ> qualify a 2.6.32 kernel released in 2009. Prehistoric maybe? Indeed, but we don't have any choice there. And it isn't Linus' 2.6.32, its openvz's port of rh's port of 2.6.32. So it

Re: dbconfig-common: near future change in dependency stack

2015-12-11 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Zigo, On 10-12-15 01:12, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Now, what should I do if my packages support all types of db currently > supported by dbconfig-common (ie: sqlite, mysql and postgress)? Wasn't my example in the first e-mail clear? I would expect: Depends: dbconfig-sqlite | dbconfig-sqlite3 | d

Re: Bug#807241: ITP: archlinux-xdg-menu -- Convert freedesktop files to a format used by various WMs

2015-12-11 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:37:23PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > I expect it would be a good idea to CC the ITP and Nicholas, you might > want to bounce your mail. OK, sure, good idea. (snip muttering about mail redirections around Debian l

Re: generic binary names? was Re: Bug#614917: ITP: libfont-ttf-scripts-perl

2015-12-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Daniel Glassey wrote: > Any helpful thoughts on whether it is best to leave the names as they are? Personally I would get them renamed upstream, probably to ttf-* If they are likely to be run interactively then you might want to replace the underscores with dashe

Bug#614917: Info received (generic binary names? was Re: Bug#614917: ITP: libfont-ttf-scripts-perl)

2015-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will rep

Re: generic binary names? was Re: Bug#614917: ITP: libfont-ttf-scripts-perl

2015-12-11 Thread Daniel Glassey
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:21:55PM +0700, Daniel Glassey wrote to debian-perl: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:47:25PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 22:33:39 +, Daniel Glassey wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm planning to package libfont-ttf-scripts-perl based on the > > > > > >