Package: wnpp
Owner: Lucas Kanashiro
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libperinci-sub-util-perl
Version : 0.42
Upstream Author : perlancar
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Perinci-Sub-Util
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij
* Package name: klaus
Version : 0.7.1
Upstream Author : Jonas Haag
* URL : https://github.com/jonashaag/klaus
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : simple easy-to-set-up Git web v
On December 8, 2015 2:59:57 PM EST, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
>On 08/12/15 20:43, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> On Dec 08, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>> Can anybody comment on the recommended way to allow mail
>>> forwarded from debian.org mail servers?
Le 08/12/2015 20:14, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On 08-12-15 09:49, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> When local configuration does not work or when local databases cannot
>> be reached or when local database server packages are not installed
>> the priority of dbconfig-common question about r
Le 08/12/2015 20:25, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> I assume you don't like the dbconfig-pgsql | dbconfig-mysql |
> dbconfig-no-thanks dependency alternatives? By default the user will
> then get pgsql.
Not if the user has dbconfig-mysql or dbconfig-no-thanks already
installed (probably due to other pack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/12/15 20:43, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 08, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> Can anybody comment on the recommended way to allow mail
>> forwarded from debian.org mail servers?
> You whitelist them from your SPF checks, because SPF is the kind o
On Dec 08, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Can anybody comment on the recommended way to allow mail forwarded from
> debian.org mail servers?
You whitelist them from your SPF checks, because SPF is the kind of
FUSSP which requires the whole Internet to modify their servers to
support forwarding.
--
ci
Hi Mathias,
On 08-12-15 10:16, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> Would it be possible for the last point to skip completely the database
> configuration (e.g. dbconfig* not jumping in at all, when tryton-neso pulls in
> tryton-server)?
I believe this is something that you would need to implement inside the
Hi Vincent,
On 08-12-15 09:49, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> When local configuration does not work or when local databases cannot
> be reached or when local database server packages are not installed
> the priority of dbconfig-common question about remote database should
> be modified so that the user
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sean Whitton
* Package name: elpa-aggressive-indent-mode
Version : 1.4.2
Upstream Author : Artur Malabarba
* URL : https://github.com/Malabarba/aggressive-indent-mode
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Emacs Lisp
D
I have the Postfix package on jessie with SPF checks on incoming mail.
I'm have trouble receiving mail forwarded from the poc...@debian.org
email address.
>From main.cf, these lines mention spf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destinat
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: gwamar
Version : 1.15.1
Upstream Author : Michał Woźniak
* URL : http://bioputer.mimuw.edu.pl/gwamar/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : genome-wide assessment of
* David Kalnischkies [151208 07:36]:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:32:52AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Marvin Renich
> > > * Tollef Fog Heen [151207 00:17]:
> > > > ]] David Kalnischkies
> > > > > [And before someone complains about PDiff being slow in apt based on
> > > > > some years
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jean Baptiste Favre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: python-protobix
Version : 0.0.9
Upstream Author : Jean Baptiste Favre
* URL : https://github.com/jbfavre/python-protobix
* License : GP
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-senlinclient
Version : 0.1.8
Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/python-senlinclient
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Descr
(adding the missing reference to online resources)
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 01:35:59PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> messups without hashsums and pdiffs currently haven't [0], but if we
[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-dak/2015/08/msg00012.html and my
followup https://lists.debian.org/debi
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:16:33AM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Le 06/12/2015 13:01, David Kalnischkies a écrit :
> > On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 07:58:07AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> >> Will it still be possible to update just the apt-file index, separately
> >> from updating the main package ind
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 08:50:55AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2015-12-06 at 07:01, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 07:58:07AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> > (as I am sightly lying, it is actually possible – just not very
> > accessible for a user and it would have issues
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:32:52AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Marvin Renich
> > * Tollef Fog Heen [151207 00:17]:
> > > ]] David Kalnischkies
> > > > [And before someone complains about PDiff being slow in apt based on
> > > > some years old experience: The PDiff handling was changed nea
* Tollef Fog Heen [151208 04:33]:
> ]] Marvin Renich
> > I set Acquire::Pdiffs::FileLimit "3"; and have been much happier. Why
> > this (or something near this) wasn't the default from the start, I don't
> > know. The current default is an extremely poor choice. Perhaps someone
> > should file
* Vincent Danjean [151208 03:17]:
> Le 06/12/2015 13:01, David Kalnischkies a écrit :
> > You can't update individual indexes at the moment. The question is why
> > you would want to as from my point of view that was a pretty annoying
> > technical detail that I had to run two (or three [debtags]
]] Marvin Renich
> * Tollef Fog Heen [151207 00:17]:
> > ]] David Kalnischkies
> >
> > > [And before someone complains about PDiff being slow in apt based on
> > > some years old experience: The PDiff handling was changed nearly two
> > > years ago… – and apt-file was using PDiffs before alrea
* Paul Gevers: " dbconfig-common: near future change in dependency stack" (Sun,
06 Dec 2015 14:23:07 +0100):
Hi Paul,
> TL;DR;1 if your package depends on dbconfig-common please update your
> dependencies when my version 2.0.0 hits the archive (I expect in two
> weeks).
> TL;DR;2 should the new
Le 06/12/2015 20:48, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> I am totally flabbergasted. dbconfig-common goes through a lot of hoops
> just to make sure this is not true. Sure, the *default* questions and
> answers are geared towards local database servers. But by either
> (re-)configuring dbconfig-common to raise
Le 06/12/2015 13:01, David Kalnischkies a écrit :
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 07:58:07AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
>> Will it still be possible to update just the apt-file index, separately
>> from updating the main package index? I see no indication in the current
>> apt(8) man page of a way to tel
25 matches
Mail list logo
