Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-suds-jurko
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Jurko Gospodnetic
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/jurko/suds
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : lightweight SOAP
Chris Boot wrote...
> The main problem that I see is that there isn't a built-in mechanism for
> tracking such a situation, as far as I can tell. There aren't any shared
> libraries involved, so I don't have the benefit of sonames, symbols
> files or symbol versioning.
(...)
disclaimer: I might
On 2015-06-15 08:04, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 13:26:26 -0700
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>> Simon McVittie writes:
>>
>>> This is a recurring (anti-)pattern:
>>
>>> * an ABI-stable, high-level library, say libhigh0, links to a
>>> lower-level library, say liblow0
>>> * we have an
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 13:26:26 -0700
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Simon McVittie writes:
>
> > This is a recurring (anti-)pattern:
>
> > * an ABI-stable, high-level library, say libhigh0, links to a
> > lower-level library, say liblow0
> > * we have an ABI transition from liblow0 to liblow1
> > * lib
Hi!
On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 16:48:21 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2015-06-14 05:46:00 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 01:08:29 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > > On 06/13/2015 10:55 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > >
Hi Siomn,
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 05:50:02PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 14/06/15 17:19, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > I think either libgnutls-deb0-28 or libnettle6 should add a Breaks:
> > libnettle4[1], to ensure all related packages are upgraded in lockstep.
>
> This is a recurring (anti-)
On 2015-06-14 18:15:33 +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Note that the problem still occurs on an available set of packages:
> > just start with a Debian/stable system (jessie) and upgrade
> > libgnutls-deb0-28 to unstable (no dependencies/conflicts will
> > yield an upgrade of wget, which
Simon McVittie writes:
> This is a recurring (anti-)pattern:
> * an ABI-stable, high-level library, say libhigh0, links to a
> lower-level library, say liblow0
> * we have an ABI transition from liblow0 to liblow1
> * liblow0 and liblow1 do not both have versioned symbols
And this point is th
On 2015-06-14 18:43:33 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 16:03:32 +0200, Vincent Lefevre
> wrote:
> >Normally, a well-designed dependency system should make sure that the
> >user cannot install an incorrect combination of packages (avoiding
> >segmentation faults and internal errors),
Hi all,
I'm emailing again because I realise I got the per-package QA email
addresses all wrong, but also because I don't think we came to any real
resolution on this.
My original message:
On 07/06/15 11:26, Chris Boot wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apologies for the long email, but there's a lot to disc
Simon McVittie wrote:
[...]
> One solution is to give the lower-level library versioned symbols, with
> at least one unique version per SONAME. That's how libjpeg and libpng
> avoid breaking lots of GUIs every time they bump SONAME, for instance.
[...]
FWIW this specific combination should not br
On 14/06/15 17:19, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I think either libgnutls-deb0-28 or libnettle6 should add a Breaks:
> libnettle4[1], to ensure all related packages are upgraded in lockstep.
This is a recurring (anti-)pattern:
* an ABI-stable, high-level library, say libhigh0, links to a
lower-level
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 16:03:32 +0200, Vincent Lefevre
wrote:
>Normally, a well-designed dependency system should make sure that the
>user cannot install an incorrect combination of packages (avoiding
>segmentation faults and internal errors), e.g. during a partial
>upgrade. But it appears that this
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 16:03:32 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788710#10
>
> Note that the problem still occurs on an available set of packages: just
> start with a Debian/stable system (jessie) and upgrade libgnutls-deb0-28
> to unstable (no dep
Hi,
> Note that the problem still occurs on an available set of packages:
> just start with a Debian/stable system (jessie) and upgrade
> libgnutls-deb0-28 to unstable (no dependencies/conflicts will
> yield an upgrade of wget, which will occasionally segfault).
well, then, obviously, the depende
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Therefore, I'm tempted to raise this to the technical committee
> (putting their list as Cc). Does anyone see a reason why I am
> mistaking here?
Does a patch exist which can enable lz for orig.tar?
Otherwise, I guess some of us could be involved to h
I'm currently using xz for my own files, but...
On 2015-06-14 05:46:00 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 01:08:29 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > On 06/13/2015 10:55 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > >> As a friend puts it:
> >
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 14:08:24 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> And by the way, xz wouldn't be usable with pristine-tar for the same
> reason.
Ehm. pristine-xz(1) would beg to disagree.
In the multimedia team, we use it for over 40 packages (where upstream
provides an xz file of course).
I guess y
Normally, a well-designed dependency system should make sure that the
user cannot install an incorrect combination of packages (avoiding
segmentation faults and internal errors), e.g. during a partial
upgrade. But it appears that this is not the case, and users are
required to do "apt-get (dist-)up
Guillem,
First, thanks for your reply and taking the time to reply on every
point. This really is helpful.
While I believe all of your argumentation is correct, I am still not
convince about the reproducibility, which is my main issue here. Could
you please reply to that point, and that one only?
20 matches
Mail list logo
