Hi!
On Sun, 2015-06-07 at 10:36:41 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> For devscripts you can define a variable "DEBSIGN_KEYID". For
> dpkg it is called "DEB_SIGN_KEYID". git-buildpackage doesn't
> support a keyid environment variable at all, as it seems. All
> ignore the default-key option set in .gnup
Hi,
On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 01:08:29 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 06/13/2015 10:55 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> I've been using xz compression for a long time, but I see a big defect
> >> which is today pushing me to turn it off for the .o
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Reading these bugs, am I right that the archive already supports lzip
> for the orig.tar file?
AFAICT, there is no mention of .lz or lzip in the dak source code.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> over the past days, DDPO grew the ability to also show oldoldstable
> (aka squeeze) versions, mostly for the benefit of those working on
> squeeze-lts.
I added this post to DevNews and sent it to d-d-a.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.o
On 06/13/2015 10:55 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> I've been using xz compression for a long time, but I see a big defect
>> which is today pushing me to turn it off for the .orig.tar file. The
>> issue is that depending on the version of xz-utils,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Luca Falavigna 2015-06-13
>
>> Would it be also possible to exclude from the view packages no longer
>> maintained in the selected suites (see #736715) ?
>
> That'd be more involved change. We used to only look at
> unstable/experiment
Re: Luca Falavigna 2015-06-13
> Would it be also possible to exclude from the view packages no longer
> maintained in the selected suites (see #736715) ?
That'd be more involved change. We used to only look at
unstable/experimental to gather maintainer information. The problem
with that is if a
Hi,
2015-06-13 19:36 GMT+02:00 Christoph Berg :
> The display logic is now generalized so it can also exclude the
> "older" dists, e.g. &version=testing will just show testing and
> later. The default is to show oldstable and up.
Thanks for this new feature!
Would it be also possible to exclude f
Hi,
over the past days, DDPO grew the ability to also show oldoldstable
(aka squeeze) versions, mostly for the benefit of those working on
squeeze-lts.
To use, append &version=oldoldstable to your DDPO URL, or set it via
the usual display configuration dialog at the bottom of the page.
https://q
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Balasankar C
* Package name: ruby-rotp
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author : Mark Percival
* URL : https://github.com/mdp/rotp
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Ruby library for generating and ve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 13/06/15 15:03, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I did not ask for yet another environment variable.
Ghod Forbid! But for info I also found that dput uses ~/.dput.cf
> I am just asking for a common way to configure the *default* GPG
> key to use for *all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/08/15 18:48, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: Hi folks,
>
> Trying to get rid of my old GPG key I stumbled over this:
>
> For devscripts you can define a variable "DEBSIGN_KEYID". For dpkg
]] Paul Wise
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> > I could see us extending the apt preferences format to be something
> > like:
>
> Why the preferences file instead of the sources.list file, which can
> already be in deb822 format?
Primarily because I wasn't aware of
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I could see us extending the apt preferences format to be something
> like:
Why the preferences file instead of the sources.list file, which can
already be in deb822 format?
https://lists.debian.org/deity/2014/01/msg00055.html
Some more
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Is there any reason why we wouldn't do that?
It was already rejected by the dpkg maintainers twice.
https://bugs.debian.org/600094
https://bugs.debian.org/556960
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
]] Wouter Verhelst
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Wouter Verhelst
> >
> > > Having said that, I do agree with you that we should not allow just
> > > about anyone to create a repository which will be automatically trusted
> > > by the whole Debian syst
Dear friends,
I've been using xz compression for a long time, but I see a big defect
which is today pushing me to turn it off for the .orig.tar file. The
issue is that depending on the version of xz-utils, it produces a
different output.
We use "git archive" within the PKG OpenStack team to gener
]] David Kalnischkies
> It is on my TODO list to drop the --force-yes flag and replace it with
> specialised --allow-* flags 'just' to force users to acknowledge what
> it is they are saying yes to. Somehow most people are way more willing
> to add --allow-everything than --allow-prostate-exam …
18 matches
Mail list logo
