Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ghislain Antony Vaillant
* Package name: arrayfire
Version : 3.0
Upstream Author : ArrayFire Development Group
* URL : http://arrayfire.com/
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang: C++
Description : High perfo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Balasankar C
* Package name: ruby-encryptor
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream Author : Sean Huber
* URL : https://github.com/attr-encrypted/encryptor
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Wrapper for the
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 08:03:54PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 09:28 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Marc Haber wrote:
> >> I have tried this just last week and have found it kind of
> >> unsatisfactory that it doesn't work in virtualized environments. For
> >> example, in a KVM VM wit
Dear Antonio,
Antonio Terceiro writes:
>> Are there currently any problems with debci? Does it really run
>> continiously?
>
> What is happening is that a system that did the job when the load was
> small (190 packages), using a "simplest thing that works" philosophy now
> needs a little bit of w
On 05/08/2015 09:28 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Marc Haber wrote:
>> I have tried this just last week and have found it kind of
>> unsatisfactory that it doesn't work in virtualized environments. For
>> example, in a KVM VM with virtio ethernet, the network devices still
>> end up in the system as e
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Balasankar C
* Package name: ruby-attr-required
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Nov Matake
* URL : https://github.com/nov/attr_required/
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Provide attr_requi
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CAELVyQdRXkC17D-iiaRwt22hv19P_v=yjjrlcf4anxzdepg...@mail.gmail.com
Hello,
While I was writing these responses, I was monitoring ci.debian.net, and
it seems I spoke too soon.
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:33:08PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > Are there currently any problems with debci? Does it really run
> > continiously?
>
> What is happening is that a syste
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 08:13:01AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2015 21:23:25 +0200
> Ole Streicher wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > how does ci.debian.net actually (re-)run the tests?
>
> I'm also seeing problems with updated packages not running the tests.
> The News item on ci.debian
Hello Ole,
Thanks for bringing this up. Hopefully I will be able to shed some light
into the issue.
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 09:23:25PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how does ci.debian.net actually (re-)run the tests?
>
> I have several tests added since 5 weeks now, but never got a
> su
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 09:34:59AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Stuart Prescott writes:
> > I see that fitscut doesn't declare that it has a test suite in d/control.
> > While dpkg adds that field into the dsc file for you [1], I don't now how
> > that interacts debci which states that the main
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ilias Tsitsimpis
* Package name: goobook
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Christer Sjöholm
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/goobook
* License : GPL-3.0+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : access your Googl
* Niko Tyni:
> If there are several /usr/bin/perl processes and /usr/bin/perl is
> statically linked against libperl, every process has its own copy of
> the libperl code in memory. In the case of dynamic linking, there's just
> one copy.
No, there is still only one copy in memory (or two if appl
Stuart Prescott writes:
> I see that fitscut doesn't declare that it has a test suite in d/control.
> While dpkg adds that field into the dsc file for you [1], I don't now how
> that interacts debci which states that the maintainer needs to add that
> field to debian/control [2]. I don't know w
On Sat, 16 May 2015 21:23:25 +0200
Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how does ci.debian.net actually (re-)run the tests?
I'm also seeing problems with updated packages not running the tests.
The News item on ci.debian.net only lists a handful of packages being
tested per day. With the churn throug
15 matches
Mail list logo