Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: ca-cacert
Version: 2011.0523
Upstream Author: CAcert.org
License: https://www.cacert.org/policy/RootDistributionLicense.html
URL: https://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=3
Vcs-
[ Please follow up on d-d and d-cross (M-F-T set). ]
Hi!
There are several cleanups and order changes in the pipe for the default
dpkg-shlibdeps shared library directory search list in dpkg 1.18.x.
It was previously, in decreasing order of preference:
0. «dpkg-shlibdeps -l» (or via «dh_shlibd
On Thu, 7 May 2015 at 14:43 Brian May
wrote:
> Looks like my system is still using wheezy/pve which has somewhat old
> packages; will need to change that to wheezy/pve-no-subscription and update
> as soon as I can.
>
So I upgraded my kernel, at first glance it seems a lot healthier. I
noticed th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Eugene V. Lyubimkin"
* Package name: cppformat
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Victor Zverovich
* URL : http://cppformat.github.io/
* License : BSD 2-clause
Programming Lang: C++
Description : fast type-safe C
❦ 15 mai 2015 17:57 +0200, gregor herrmann :
>> A good timesaver is to have libeatmydata or similar. But this is still
>> slow. For example, the manual page step.
>
> For pbuilder/cowbuilder I'm using the following hook:
>
> % cat /var/cache/pbuilder/hooks/D10-man-db
> #!/bin/sh
> # Don't rebui
On Fri, 15 May 2015 10:04:35 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> A good timesaver is to have libeatmydata or similar. But this is still
> slow. For example, the manual page step.
For pbuilder/cowbuilder I'm using the following hook:
% cat /var/cache/pbuilder/hooks/D10-man-db
#!/bin/sh
# Don't rebuil
]] Neil Williams
> > This is not a dirty container.
>
> Sorry, it is dirty. It just is. It's dirty in the worst possible manner
> - stuff directly relating to the builds you care about is going to end
> up out of date or possibly even corrupted by a mis-configured build.
> There's nothing "mode
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:04:35AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> 3. The real build of the package foo is done in a container based on
> the image "dockerbuild-sid-foo". All changes made by in this
> container are discarded. The image "dockerbuild-sid-foo" is left
> pristine.
You can
❦ 15 mai 2015 08:19 +0100, Neil Williams :
>> For some packages, installing the dependencies can take more time than
>> building the package.
>
> An inevitable cost of building software that has a significant stack of
> dependencies. However, each of those dependencies needs to be cleaned
> up
Quoting Vincent Bernat (2015-05-14 23:25:20)
> ❦ 14 mai 2015 14:57 +0100, Neil Williams :
>
>>> More seriously, but this needs some additional work, it should be
>>> easier to manage persistent build dependencies. The first time you
>>> build a package, it retrieves and install all deps. The sec
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Kelley
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-yawl
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Andrew Kelley
* URL : https://github.com/andrewrk/node-yawl
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Java
On Thu, 14 May 2015 23:25:20 +0200
Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 14 mai 2015 14:57 +0100, Neil Williams :
>
> >> More seriously, but this needs some additional work, it should be
> >> easier to manage persistent build dependencies. The first time you
> >> build a package, it retrieves and install
Hi, I wrote the below a while ago but never hit send, sorry.
You may also be interested in the Debian Cloud group (debian-cloud@),
and they might be interested in this tool :-)
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 03:55:09PM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> I've whipped up a quick script that uses Docker images
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:26:38PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 14 mai 2015 17:22 +0300, Исаев Виталий :
>
> > Regarding the state of containers after the finish of the build
> > process: we surely don't need them anymore. Every container is used
> > just once and removed after a while. We h
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:57:01PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > ❦ 14 mai 2015 14:02 +0100, Neil Williams :
> > > What is the reason for docker vs chroot, LVM snapshot or VM?
> >
> > It's hype! ;-)
>
> So can be ignored. Good. The remaining options are LVM snapshot,
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
