Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robin Sheat
* Package name: libpdf-fromhtml-perl
Version : 0.31
Upstream Author : 唐鳳
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/PDF-FromHTML
* License : CC0
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : converts HTML documents
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robin Sheat
* Package name: libpdf-writer-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Rob Kinyon
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/PDF-Writer
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : PDF w
Was that before or after arm64 and ppc64el migrated off ports to the
main archive?
I'm pretty sure ppc64el was never on debian-ports, it went straight from
an IBM run repository to the main archive.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
>> Could we:
>>
>> Freeze in 6-8 months
>> Release in 10-12 months
>
> Please don't.
I do agree.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/858896495.1039
On 02/05/15 11:58, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Could we:
>
> Freeze in 6-8 months
> Release in 10-12 months
Please don't.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.deb
On Mon, 4 May 2015 18:27:33 +0200, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
>On May 04, Marc Haber wrote:
>
>> >Too many releases, no more Plesk.
>> Is not having P(l)est really a bad thing?
>If you sell servers or hosting and want to have customers, then yes.
>(Also, customers would not care less if t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alba Crespi
* Package name: r-cran-nnls
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Katharine M. Mullen and Ivo H. M.
van Stokkum
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nnls/
* License : GPL (≥ 2)
Programming Lang: R, Fo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alba Crespi
* Package name: r-cran-fastmatch
Version : 1.0-4
Upstream Author : Simon Urbanek
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/fastmatch/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C, R
Description : Fast m
On May 04, Marc Haber wrote:
> >Too many releases, no more Plesk.
> Is not having P(l)est really a bad thing?
If you sell servers or hosting and want to have customers, then yes.
(Also, customers would not care less if the servers came with Centos
installed so only Debian would lose in this scen
Joerg Jaspert, le Mon 04 May 2015 18:11:29 +0200, a écrit :
> On 13931 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > That pad says: "As a result of current state, d-ports cannot accept more
> > ports". If that's still true, it would make sense to postpone dropping
> > hurd and sparc until this is fixed.
On 13931 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> That pad says: "As a result of current state, d-ports cannot accept more
> ports". If that's still true, it would make sense to postpone dropping
> hurd and sparc until this is fixed...
Hurd is already on d-p, so hurd actually has double infrastructure
+++ Lucas Nussbaum [2015-05-04 12:47 +0200]:
> On 04/05/15 at 18:04 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Lucas Nussbaum (2015-05-04):
> > >> I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures
> > >> in an official way, while s
On Mon, 4 May 2015 15:35:12 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>On May 04, mudongliang wrote:
>
>> > I fear that such a short release cycle would strongly disincentive many
>> > commercial vendors from supporting Debian systems: it already happened
>> > to Fedora.
>> Can you give the detailed problem t
On May 04, mudongliang wrote:
> > I fear that such a short release cycle would strongly disincentive many
> > commercial vendors from supporting Debian systems: it already happened
> > to Fedora.
> Can you give the detailed problem that happened to Fedora?
Too many releases, no more Plesk.
--
On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 15:52 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 02, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> > Could we:
> >
> > Freeze in 6-8 months
> > Release in 10-12 months
> I fear that such a short release cycle would strongly disincentive many
> commercial vendors from supporting Debian systems:
On 04/05/15 at 18:04 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Lucas Nussbaum (2015-05-04):
> >> I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures
> >> in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and
> >> other t
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum (2015-05-04):
>> I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures
>> in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and
>> other teams. I'm not entirely clear on the status of debian-po
Lucas Nussbaum (2015-05-04):
> I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures
> in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and
> other teams. I'm not entirely clear on the status of debian-ports.org,
> and of what the current downsides of using debian
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 04:34:18AM +, Brian May wrote:
> On Sat, 2 May 2015 at 23:33 Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > Yes, there is a pve kernel available containing a backport of this
> > missing piece. I think it is something like -36.
Ah, thanks for the hint. I hadn't checked yet starting at w
19 matches
Mail list logo
