On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:08:32 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo
>https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-main
>policy section 2.2.1
>"packages in main must not require or recommend a package outside of
>main for compilation or execution (thus, the package must not declare
>a "Pre-Depends", "D
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:44:52 Robert Edmonds wrote:
> * Package name: wrk
> Version : 4.0.1
> Upstream Author : Will Glozer
> * URL : https://github.com/wg/wrk
> * License : Apache-2.0, BSD-3-Clause
> Programming Lang: C
> Description : HTTP benchmarking t
Jeff Epler (2015-04-15):
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 07:06:53AM +1000, Riley Baird wrote:
> > What if that website goes down one day?
>
> Hmm. I thought a Debian package should not require an internet
> connection to be built from source, but in quickly scanning the debian
> policy manual and the
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 07:06:53AM +1000, Riley Baird wrote:
>> What if that website goes down one day?
>
> Hmm. I thought a Debian package should not require an internet
> connection to be built from source, but in quickly scanning the debian
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert Edmonds
* Package name: wrk
Version : 4.0.1
Upstream Author : Will Glozer
* URL : https://github.com/wg/wrk
* License : Apache-2.0, BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang: C
Description : HTTP benchmarking tool
wr
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 07:06:53AM +1000, Riley Baird wrote:
> What if that website goes down one day?
Hmm. I thought a Debian package should not require an internet
connection to be built from source, but in quickly scanning the debian
policy manual and the debian new maintainers guide I didn't
2015-04-15 23:06 GMT+02:00 Riley Baird <
bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch>:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:55:56 +0100
> Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Vincent Bernat writes ("Re: Minified javascripts in packages"):
>> >13 avril 2015 17:37 +1000, Ben Finney :
>> >> Is the implication of “buil
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:55:56 +0100
Ian Jackson wrote:
> Vincent Bernat writes ("Re: Minified javascripts in packages"):
> >13 avril 2015 17:37 +1000, Ben Finney :
> >> Is the implication of “built by web services” that the source isn't
> >> available for redistribution? Those would be excluded fr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
* Package name: cen64
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Tyler J. Stachecki
* URL : http://www.cen64.com/
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: C, Assembly
Description : Cycle-Accurate
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:59:16PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> You can see the `options' file I passed, below. I have not verified
> the Secretary's quorum calculation.
devotee did a quorum calculation, but i will need to recalculate
it since there are DDs that don't have a key in the keyring.
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kyle Moffett
* Package name: bazel
Version : 0~pre20150410-cc4463-1 (No upstream release yet)
Upstream Author : Google
* URL : http://bazel.io/
* License : Apache License 2.0
❦ 15 avril 2015 16:55 +0100, Ian Jackson :
>>Usually, this is something like this:
>> http://modernizr.com/download/#-fontface-backgroundsize-borderimage-borderradius-boxshadow-flexbox-hsla-multiplebgs-opacity-rgba-textshadow-cssanimations-csscolumns-generatedcontent-cssgradients-cssreflections
Vincent Bernat writes ("Re: Minified javascripts in packages"):
>13 avril 2015 17:37 +1000, Ben Finney :
>> Is the implication of “built by web services” that the source isn't
>> available for redistribution? Those would be excluded from Debian
>> trivially by that criterion, then.
>
>Usually, thi
❦ 15 avril 2015 13:47 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard :
>> What I have done so far in my package is to include the
>> concatenated but unminified js from the upstream (that would be my
>> upstream's upstream) source tarball in debian/missing-sources.
>> During package build i use ugli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
devo...@vote.debian.org writes ("Results for Debian Project Leader 2015
Election"):
> This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
> Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
> Debian Project Se
Quoting Vincent Bernat (2015-04-15 13:26:59)
> ❦ 15 avril 2015 11:07 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard :
>
> What I have done so far in my package is to include the
> concatenated but unminified js from the upstream (that would be my
> upstream's upstream) source tarball in debian/missing-sour
❦ 15 avril 2015 11:07 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard :
What I have done so far in my package is to include the concatenated
but unminified js from the upstream (that would be my upstream's
upstream) source tarball in debian/missing-sources. During package
build i use uglifyjs (wh
> What I have done so far in my package is to include the concatenated
> but unminified js from the upstream (that would be my upstream's
> upstream) source tarball in debian/missing-sources. During package
> build i use uglifyjs (which is already in Debian) to place minified
> copies where the
Quoting Vincent Bernat (2015-04-15 10:49:36)
> ❦ 15 avril 2015 10:10 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard :
>
>>> What I have done so far in my package is to include the concatenated
>>> but unminified js from the upstream (that would be my upstream's
>>> upstream) source tarball in debian/missing-sources. D
❦ 15 avril 2015 10:10 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard :
>> What I have done so far in my package is to include the concatenated
>> but unminified js from the upstream (that would be my upstream's
>> upstream) source tarball in debian/missing-sources. During package
>> build i use uglifyjs (which is a
❦ 15 avril 2015 10:05 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard :
>> When the license says that the derivative should be redistributed with
>> the source in the prefered form of modification, every derivative use
>> the same prefered form of modification. When the license says nothing
>> about that, there the
Quoting Andreas Noteng (2015-04-14 21:05:54)
> Den 13. april 2015 14:05, skrev Wookey:
>> +++ Ben Finney [2015-04-13 14:59 +1000]:
>>> Paul Wise writes:
>>>
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Can we agree, in the context of the original post of this thread:
>
Quoting Vincent Bernat (2015-04-14 18:45:37)
> ❦ 14 avril 2015 10:39 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard :
>
>> I presume that we can agree that, if someone started offering a
>> web service compiling C code with output an order of magnitude
>> better in every dimension than gcc can achieve, we
23 matches
Mail list logo
