❦ 14 avril 2015 11:00 +1000, Ben Finney :
>> > I presume that we can agree that, if someone started offering a web
>> > service compiling C code with output an order of magnitude better in
>> > every dimension than gcc can achieve, we still wouldn't use it for
>> > our binaries (at least not unl
Vincent Bernat writes:
> ❦ 13 avril 2015 10:37 +0100, Philip Hands :
>
> > I presume that we can agree that, if someone started offering a web
> > service compiling C code with output an order of magnitude better in
> > every dimension than gcc can achieve, we still wouldn't use it for
> > our
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: marcindulak
* Package name: gpaw
Version : 0.10.0.11364
Upstream Author : GPAW-community
* URL : https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/gpaw/
* License : GPLv3+
Programming Lang: C, Python
Description : DFT and beyond within
On Monday, April 13, 2015 11:25:05 PM Vincent Bernat wrote:
> 13 avril 2015 10:37 +0100, Philip Hands :
> > I presume that we can agree that, if someone started offering a web
> > service compiling C code with output an order of magnitude better in
> > every dimension than gcc can achieve, we sti
❦ 13 avril 2015 10:37 +0100, Philip Hands :
> I presume that we can agree that, if someone started offering a web
> service compiling C code with output an order of magnitude better in
> every dimension than gcc can achieve, we still wouldn't use it for our
> binaries (at least not unless it wer
❦ 13 avril 2015 17:37 +1000, Ben Finney :
>> As I have seen instances where the JavaScript was built by web
>> services, I'd say the real world is much too complicated to even agree
>> on that.
>
> Is the implication of “built by web services” that the source isn't
> available for redistribution
+++ Ben Finney [2015-04-13 14:59 +1000]:
> Paul Wise writes:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> >
> > > Can we agree, in the context of the original post of this thread:
> > >
> > > Rebuilding from source *is* a reasonable requirement, attainable with
> > > what we have t
Jérémy Lal writes:
> 2015-04-13 11:37 GMT+02:00 Philip Hands :
>> Paul Wise writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>>>
Right, I wasn't clear enough: I'm saying that despite all the other
non-JavaScript cases brought up later in the thread, the requirement
>>
2015-04-13 11:37 GMT+02:00 Philip Hands :
> Paul Wise writes:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>>
>>> Right, I wasn't clear enough: I'm saying that despite all the other
>>> non-JavaScript cases brought up later in the thread, the requirement
>>> (build from source form, wi
Paul Wise writes:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>
>> Right, I wasn't clear enough: I'm saying that despite all the other
>> non-JavaScript cases brought up later in the thread, the requirement
>> (build from source form, with only build dependencies also in Debian)
>> appl
Paul Wise writes:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > Right, I wasn't clear enough: I'm saying that despite all the other
> > non-JavaScript cases brought up later in the thread, the requirement
> > (build from source form, with only build dependencies also in Debian)
> >
11 matches
Mail list logo
