On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 19:34 -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Note that this does not seem to be due to a lack of people willing to
> work on it though, cf. #750135.
Yeah, I was following that bug in silence ;-)
Cheers,
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Mar 31 2015, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 23:18 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> No, it is not. It used to be, but apt's dependency resolver is far
>> superior to aptitude's these days.
> Are there so many cases where you need it? I usually just select what I
> want
+++ The Wanderer [2015-03-31 11:36 -0400]:
> On 03/31/2015 at 11:29 AM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > On 31 March 2015 at 17:00, Matt Zagrabelny
> > wrote:
> >> Thus, I believe there are a couple of knobs to turn to make
> >> aptitude behave more expectedly.
> >
> > Here is it:
> >
> > $ cat /etc/ap
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 23:18 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> No, it is not. It used to be, but apt's dependency resolver is far
> superior to aptitude's these days.
Are there so many cases where you need it? I usually just select what I
want and install it...
IMHO aptitude is one of the hearts of
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:18:50AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015, at 05:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> > I am curious why the aptitude package still has Priority: standard, i.e.
> > why it is installed next to apt in each and every Debian installation?
> >
> > Ap
I've whipped up a quick script that uses Docker images to build Debian
packages. It's basically the same idea as pbuilder/cowbuilder (and was
inspired by them), but using Docker.
It's in pretty rough shape still and there's a lot of stuff to do still
(and lots to learn about Docker and Ruby), but
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> It's tangential to the main topic of this thread, but you might want to
> give /usr/bin/apt a try: it abstracts over apt-get / apt-cache, offering
> a single CLI entry point to (some of) the functionalities of both.
I've used the new apt tool, and I do find it quite an
On 03/31/2015 at 11:29 AM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 31 March 2015 at 17:00, Matt Zagrabelny
> wrote:
>
>> I've grepped debian-devel, but cannot find an email that was sent
>> to the list some months ago about tweaks to /etc/apt/apt.conf
>> (IIRC) to make aptitude behave more sanely.
>
Hi,
On 31 March 2015 at 17:00, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> I've grepped debian-devel, but cannot find an email that was sent to
> the list some months ago about tweaks to /etc/apt/apt.conf (IIRC) to
> make aptitude behave more sanely.
> Thus, I believe there are a couple of knobs to turn to make ap
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 9:32 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> Repeatedly over the years - I'd almost say consistently - I've seen
> aptitude report that a requested package change (install, remove, or
> some combination) would result in an invalid or conflicting dependency
> situation, and suggest a sol
On 03/31/2015 at 09:18 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015, at 05:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
>> I am curious why the aptitude package still has Priority: standard,
>> i.e. why it is installed next to apt in each and every Debian
>> installation?
>>
>> Aptitude isn't
2015-03-31 15:18 GMT+02:00 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh :
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015, at 05:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>> I am curious why the aptitude package still has Priority: standard, i.e.
>> why it is installed next to apt in each and every Debian installation?
>>
>> Aptitude isn't recommended f
Am 31.03.2015 um 15:18 schrieb Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015, at 05:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>> I am curious why the aptitude package still has Priority: standard, i.e.
>> why it is installed next to apt in each and every Debian installation?
>>
>> Aptitude isn't recommend
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015, at 10:22, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:18:50AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > apt-get is the simple tool everyone knows about, though. It also needs
> > another simple tools like apt-cache to be really usable.
>
> It's tangential to th
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015, at 03:30, Andreas Tille wrote:
> since I have cared for ACLs set on all projects I have admin permissions
> I always (obviously wrongly - see[1]) assume that people do so as well
> in their projects. I experienced the same issue yesterday in
> pkg-openstack: The fact that the
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:18:50AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> apt-get is the simple tool everyone knows about, though. It also needs
> another simple tools like apt-cache to be really usable.
It's tangential to the main topic of this thread, but you might want to
give /usr/bin/apt
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015, at 05:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> I am curious why the aptitude package still has Priority: standard, i.e.
> why it is installed next to apt in each and every Debian installation?
>
> Aptitude isn't recommended for dist-upgrading since Lenny, I think.
>
> Do we really nee
Am Dienstag, den 31.03.2015, 12:34 +0200 schrieb Jeroen Dekkers:
> There are some people doing their best to keep it working (kudos to
Yes, kudos to them!
> them!), but grub2 still needs a lot more help. It currently has two
Well, arguably then standing on this list for the past 11 years hasn't
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 08:07:36AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 08:30:34 +0200
> Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > since I have cared for ACLs set on all projects I have admin
> > permissions I always (obviously wrongly - see[1]) assume that people
> > do so as well in
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:14:16 +0200, Fabian Greffrath
wrote:
>I am curious why the aptitude package still has Priority: standard, i.e.
>why it is installed next to apt in each and every Debian installation?
>
>Aptitude isn't recommended for dist-upgrading since Lenny, I think.
>
>Do we really need
Hi Philip
Thank you very much for your response.
Regards
On 2015/03/25, 4:28 PM, "Philip Hands" wrote:
>Andile Ntebe writes:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Im not sure why Gareth said PHP, I’m referring to Apache 2.2.22.
>>
>> The below vulnerabilities seem to affect this version:
>
>You seem not to have n
Hi Florian
Here you go:
http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_22.html
Regards
On 2015/03/28, 10:42 PM, "Florian Weimer" wrote:
>* Andile Ntebe:
>
>> Im not sure why Gareth said PHP, I’m referring to Apache 2.2.22.
>>
>> The below vulnerabilities seem to affect this version:
>
>
* Andile Ntebe:
> On 2015/03/28, 10:42 PM, "Florian Weimer" wrote:
>
>>* Andile Ntebe:
>>
>>> Im not sure why Gareth said PHP, I’m referring to Apache 2.2.22.
>>>
>>> The below vulnerabilities seem to affect this version:
>>
>>Hi Andile,
>>
>>Where did you get this list?
> Here you go:
>
> http:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alba Crespi
* Package name: r-cran-phangorn
Version : 1.99-12
Upstream Author : Klaus Schliep
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/phangorn/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: R
Description : GNU R pac
Fabian Greffrath writes:
> Am Dienstag, den 31.03.2015, 10:26 +0200 schrieb Toby St Clere Smithe:
>> The Fluid soundfont is split into two parts: GM and GS. This does not
>> apply for timgm6mb, so such naming doesn't make sense. Both names are
>> descriptive, and are of the general schema
>> name
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Zygmunt Krynicki
* Package name: plainbox-provider-piglit
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Zygmynt Krynicki
* URL : https://launchpad.net/plainbox-provider-piglit
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: Python
Descripti
At Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:30:31 +0200,
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
> Hi -devel,
>
> > For the following packages help is requested:
> > [... massive package list ...]
>
> is the list of packages that usually follows this line still useful for
> anybody? I mean, there are packages in it like e.g. grub
2015-03-30 20:50 GMT+01:00 Adrien Clerc :
> Le 30/03/2015 20:50, Ghislain Vaillant a écrit :
>
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Ghislain Antony Vaillant
>
> * Package name: bitstring
> Version : 3.1.3
> Upstream Author : Scott Griffiths
> * URL : https:/
Am Dienstag, den 31.03.2015, 10:26 +0200 schrieb Toby St Clere Smithe:
> The Fluid soundfont is split into two parts: GM and GS. This does not
> apply for timgm6mb, so such naming doesn't make sense. Both names are
> descriptive, and are of the general schema
> name-soundfont[-specialisation].
I
Fabian Greffrath, le Tue 31 Mar 2015 10:30:31 +0200, a écrit :
> > For the following packages help is requested:
> > [... massive package list ...]
>
> is the list of packages that usually follows this line still useful for
> anybody? I mean, there are packages in it like e.g. grub2 for which help
Fabian Greffrath writes:
> The current name of the package is "musescore-soundfont-gm" and there
> are two other soundfonts packaged in Debian in the "fluid-soundfont-gm"
> and "fluid-soundfont-gs" packages. Maybe the name of the new package
> should be chosen to be somewhat consistent with the ex
Hi -devel,
> For the following packages help is requested:
> [... massive package list ...]
is the list of packages that usually follows this line still useful for
anybody? I mean, there are packages in it like e.g. grub2 for which help
was "requested 3972 days ago"; that's more than a decade, fo
> Package name: timgm6mb-soundfont
The current name of the package is "musescore-soundfont-gm" and there
are two other soundfonts packaged in Debian in the "fluid-soundfont-gm"
and "fluid-soundfont-gs" packages. Maybe the name of the new package
should be chosen to be somewhat consistent with
Hi there,
I am curious why the aptitude package still has Priority: standard, i.e.
why it is installed next to apt in each and every Debian installation?
Aptitude isn't recommended for dist-upgrading since Lenny, I think.
Do we really need to have two CLI package management tools installed, is
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 08:30:34 +0200
Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since I have cared for ACLs set on all projects I have admin
> permissions I always (obviously wrongly - see[1]) assume that people
> do so as well in their projects. I experienced the same issue
> yesterday in pkg-openstack: The
35 matches
Mail list logo
