On 26 January 2015 at 07:46, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I think we're overcomplicating this. If someone really wants to put data
> that updates regularly in their MOTD *and* use update-motd.d to do this
> (we're already into territory that I suspect is pretty rare), we can just
> tell them to add a c
Josh Triplett writes:
> However, I don't think "run a pile of scripts to write out a dynamic
> MOTD at boot time" is a sensible default, either.
Why not?
> I'd suggest putting update-motd and update-motd.d into a separate,
> optional package that users can install if they really want it, and
>
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Josh Triplett writes:
> > But not the Debian default. Debian defaults to "UsePAM yes" and
> > "PrintMotd no", and uses PAM to print the motd.
>
> Right, which I think is a bad idea, for the reasons stated earlier in this
> thread. :) I think the way to go here is to use t
Package: wnpp
Owner: Christopher Hoskin
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libcatalyst-authentication-store-htpasswd-perl
Version : 1.003
Upstream Author : Tomas Doran
* URL :
https://metacpan.o
Cameron Norman writes:
> Well we can do both. If these update-motd scripts actually differ in
> their result day by day, and the server is only rebooted maybe once a
> week (if not less often), then running them once at boot is not enough.
I think we're overcomplicating this. If someone really
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Michael Biebl writes:
>
>> Why run this on every boot?
>
> The main thing that you want to be up-to-date are things like the running
> kernel version, and you have no other good way of detecting that, I don't
> think.
>
> It's not like this
Michael Biebl writes:
> Why run this on every boot?
The main thing that you want to be up-to-date are things like the running
kernel version, and you have no other good way of detecting that, I don't
think.
It's not like this stuff takes very long to run, and it will happily
parallelize.
> If
Am 25.01.2015 um 20:19 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Josh Triplett writes:
>
>> But not the Debian default. Debian defaults to "UsePAM yes" and
>> "PrintMotd no", and uses PAM to print the motd.
>
> Right, which I think is a bad idea, for the reasons stated earlier in this
> thread. :) I think the
Josh Triplett writes:
> But not the Debian default. Debian defaults to "UsePAM yes" and
> "PrintMotd no", and uses PAM to print the motd.
Right, which I think is a bad idea, for the reasons stated earlier in this
thread. :) I think the way to go here is to use the update-motd.d stuff
to gener
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 776222 - lfs
Bug #776222 [general] general: Software management should be only one tool in
the GUI
Removed tag(s) lfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
776222: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
Package: general
Severity: normal
Tags: lfs
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I installed a fresh Debian with GNOME.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
I want to install new packages and update the existing ones.
* What was
Package: wnpp
Owner: Christopher Hoskin
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libcache-memcached-getparserxs-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Jonathan Steinert
* URL : https://metacpan.org/rele
12 matches
Mail list logo