Re: apache2 issues

2014-09-22 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Brian May (2014-09-23 08:02:22) >On 29 July 2014 19:04, Jeroen Dekkers <[1]jer...@dekkers.ch> wrote: > > As far as I can see this is a bug in the apache2 packaging. The httpd > virtual package should be provided by the apache2 package, not the > apache2-bin package, beca

Re: Proper notation for common licenses

2014-09-22 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Simon McVittie (2014-09-22 22:05:20) > On 22/09/14 18:48, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Quoting Markus Koschany (2014-09-22 19:25:20) >>> Version 1: >>> >>> License: GPL-2+ >>> This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or [...] >>> This program is distributed in the hope that

Re: apache2 issues

2014-09-22 Thread Brian May
On 29 July 2014 19:04, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > As far as I can see this is a bug in the apache2 packaging. The httpd > virtual package should be provided by the apache2 package, not the > apache2-bin package, because the apache2-bin package doesn't provide a > working webserver. Bug report I just

Bug#762506: RFP: enumerate -- OCaml quotation expanders for enumerating finite types

2014-09-22 Thread Hilko Bengen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: enumerate Version : 111.08.00 Upstream Author : Jane Street Capital LLC * URL or Web page : https://github.com/janestreet/enumerate * License : Apache-2.0 Description : OCaml quotation expanders for enumerating finite

Bug#762505: RFP: pa-test -- OCaml syntax extension for writing inline tests

2014-09-22 Thread Hilko Bengen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: pa-test Version : 111.08.00 Upstream Author : Jane Street Capital LLC * URL or Web page : https://github.com/janestreet/pa_test * License : Apache-2.0 Description : OCaml syntax extension for writing inline tests This

Bug#762504: RFP: pa-bench -- OCaml syntax extension for writing inline benchmarks

2014-09-22 Thread Hilko Bengen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: pa-bench Version : 111.28.00 Upstream Author : Jane Street Capital LLC * URL or Web page : https://github.com/janestreet/pa_bench * License : Apache-2.0 Description : OCaml syntax extension writing inline benchmarks T

Bug#762496: RFP: typerep -- Runtime types for OCaml

2014-09-22 Thread Hilko Bengen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: typerep Version : 111.17.00 Upstream Author : Jane Street Capital LLC * URL or Web page : https://github.com/janestreet/typerep * License : Apache-2.0 Description : Runtime types for OCaml This package is needed by ne

Re: Proper notation for common licenses

2014-09-22 Thread Simon McVittie
On 22/09/14 18:48, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Markus Koschany (2014-09-22 19:25:20) >> Version 1: >> >> License: GPL-2+ >> This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or [...] >> This program is distributed in the hope that it will be [...] >> You should have received a copy

Re: Proper notation for common licenses

2014-09-22 Thread Simon McVittie
On 22/09/14 17:15, Markus Koschany wrote: > A while ago I have started to use this > format [1] for common licenses when I saw that fellow maintainers did > the same. > > [1] Examples: > > License: GPL-2+ > On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public > License version 2 can be

Re: Proper notation for common licenses

2014-09-22 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Markus Koschany (2014-09-22 19:25:20) > On 22.09.2014 18:36, Santiago Vila wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:15:08PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >>> What do we gain by quoting common licenses in debian/copyright over >>> and over again? >> >> We don't quote (i.e. include the *full* t

Re: Proper notation for common licenses

2014-09-22 Thread Markus Koschany
On 22.09.2014 18:36, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:15:08PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >> What do we gain by quoting common licenses in debian/copyright over and >> over again? > > We don't quote (i.e. include the *full* text of) common licenses over > and over again, that's

Re: Proper notation for common licenses

2014-09-22 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:15:08PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > What do we gain by quoting common licenses in debian/copyright over and > over again? We don't quote (i.e. include the *full* text of) common licenses over and over again, that's precisely what /usr/share/common-licenses is for, an

Proper notation for common licenses

2014-09-22 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi all, I am seeking clarification how a proper license paragraph for copyright format 1.0 should be written. A while ago I have started to use this format [1] for common licenses when I saw that fellow maintainers did the same. I was recently informed that this format warrants a reject by the FTP

Bug#762459: ITP: bareos -- Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced

2014-09-22 Thread Evgeni Golov
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bareos Packaging Team * Package name: bareos Version : 14.2.1 Upstream Author : Bareos GmbH & Co. KG * URL : http://www.bareos.org * License : AGPL-3 Programming Lang: C Description : Backup Archiving Recovery Ope

Bug#762456: ITP: ejabberd-contrib -- user-contributed modules for ejabberd

2014-09-22 Thread Philipp Huebner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Philipp Huebner * Package name: ejabberd-contrib Version : 0.2014.09.22 Upstream Author : ProcessOne * URL : https://github.com/processone/ejabberd-contrib * License : GPL 2+ Programming Lang: Erlang Description :