Hi,
Thomas Goirand:
> Well, I don't agree with this view. If LibreSSL pretends to be a
> replacement for OpenSSL, then they should care about being ABI
> compatible, so we can easily switch from one implementation to the
> other.
That depends. If the ABI in question includes calls or constants wh
On 07/12/2014 08:46 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
> As libressl is currently under
> heavy development, it is imho not to be expected to have that stable ABI
> you are asking for.
Well, I don't agree with this view. If LibreSSL pretends to be a
replacement for OpenSSL, then they should care about being
"John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell" writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> OpenSSL ABI implementation to another is something of an all-or-nothing
>> affair. You can do a small amount of building key packages with the
>> other
> ? rhetorically i'm unsure there's a problem.
I have some experience
kapo...@melix.org wrote:
>Le samedi 12 juillet 2014 à 12:03 +0100, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
>>
>> Right. Did you discuss that with ftpmaster or anybody else outside of
>> the javascript team? There's typically been a consensus against very
>> small packages containing just a single script or pie
l...@ubuntu.com wrote:
>On 12 July 2014 15:15, Michael Banck wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:55:02PM +0200, Leo Iannacone wrote:
>>>
>>> But, after discussing this in JavaScript team we ended up that it is
>>> better have separated packages, instead of having a big
>>> "nodejs-common" (or wha
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 16:12:17 +0200
Leo Iannacone wrote:
> >> > Am I missing something, or is the working code in this package
> >> > really just 111 lines? Why isn't this bundled up into something
> >> > more reasonable in size for the packaging system?
> >>
> >> No,
> >> you're right. It is real
Johannes Schauer writes:
> Quoting Russ Allbery (2014-07-12 19:19:16)
>> I'd really like to see us solve this problem by figuring out a better
>> metadata distribution system (and IIRC some progress was made on that
>> front recently) than in making life more difficult for packagers.
> which pro
Hi,
Quoting Russ Allbery (2014-07-12 19:19:16)
> I'd really like to see us solve this problem by figuring out a better
> metadata distribution system (and IIRC some progress was made on that
> front recently) than in making life more difficult for packagers.
which progress is that?
With bootstra
Frederic Peters writes:
> Indeed, I also recently looked at some, but didn't speak about it; just
> like we have LaTeX packages including a serie of CTAN packages, I
> believe it would make sense to have the same sort of thing for node.js
> modules.
The CTAN case is a little bit different, as I
Steve McIntyre writes:
> Right. Did you discuss that with ftpmaster or anybody else outside of
> the javascript team? There's typically been a consensus against very
> small packages containing just a single script or piece of code so small
> that the packaging metadata is going to be as big as (
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:53:45PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
>> my intention is to package this stuff so one can have both openssl and
>> libressl installed in parallel. libressl currently has libraries with
>> these sonames:
>> libssl.so.26
>> libcrypto.so.29
> I don't r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Leo Iannacone
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-uid-safe
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Jonathan Ong (http://jongleberry.com)
* URL : https://github.com/crypto-utils/uid-safe
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-rfc3986
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Ian Cordasco
* URL : https://github.com/sigmavirus24/rfc3986
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : validatin
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:15:13PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:53:45PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > libssl.so.26
> > libcrypto.so.29
> I don't really like it, since it could potentionally clash with
> the ones provided by openssl. But it seems unlikely that openssl
> w
On 12 July 2014 15:15, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:55:02PM +0200, Leo Iannacone wrote:
>> On 12 July 2014 12:35, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> > l...@ubuntu.com wrote:
>> >>Package: wnpp
>> >>Severity: wishlist
>> >>Owner: Leo Iannacone
>> >>X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debi
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libinline-c-perl
Version : 0.58
Upstream Author : Ed J
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Inline-C
* License : Ar
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:55:02PM +0200, Leo Iannacone wrote:
> On 12 July 2014 12:35, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > l...@ubuntu.com wrote:
> >>Package: wnpp
> >>Severity: wishlist
> >>Owner: Leo Iannacone
> >>X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> >>
> >>* Package name: node-ms
> >> Ver
Le samedi 12 juillet 2014 à 12:03 +0100, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:55:02PM +0200, Leo Iannacone wrote:
> >On 12 July 2014 12:35, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >>
> >> tack:~/debian/ms.js$ wc -l index.js
> >> 111 index.js
> >>
> >> Am I missing something, or is the working cod
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 07:43:44AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 12, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > * Package name: libressl
> I am highly doubtful at best.
in which respect, and why?
> What are your plans exactly?
My plan is to first build the package(s) and upload to experimental, so
Hi Kurt,
[ I have trimmed the Cc list - we are all on devel@, anyway, right? ]
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:15:13PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:53:45PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:25:47PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > What are you doing w
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:15:13PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:53:45PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > There are a number of reasons for that, but one has been that I was
> > unhappy about the perceived 'closedness' of the project
>
> I was never very happy with it either
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:53:45PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi Kurt,
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:25:47PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > What are you doing with the binaries, include files, man pages,
> > ...? Will they conflict with the ones from openssl?
>
> my intention is to package
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:55:02PM +0200, Leo Iannacone wrote:
>On 12 July 2014 12:35, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> tack:~/debian/ms.js$ wc -l index.js
>> 111 index.js
>>
>> Am I missing something, or is the working code in this package really
>> just 111 lines? Why isn't this bundled up into somet
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I've seen ITPs for a massive set of tiny-looking node libraries go
> past on -devel in the last few months, so I thought it was about time
> I looked at one. I'm a bit worried by what I've seen, considering
> typical discussions in the past about really small packages.
>
>
On 12 July 2014 12:35, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> l...@ubuntu.com wrote:
>>Package: wnpp
>>Severity: wishlist
>>Owner: Leo Iannacone
>>X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>>
>>* Package name: node-ms
>> Version : 0.6.2
>> Upstream Author : Guillermo Rauch
>>* URL :
l...@ubuntu.com wrote:
>Package: wnpp
>Severity: wishlist
>Owner: Leo Iannacone
>X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
>* Package name: node-ms
> Version : 0.6.2
> Upstream Author : Guillermo Rauch
>* URL : https://github.com/guille/ms.js
>* License : Exp
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Leo Iannacone
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-ms
Version : 0.6.2
Upstream Author : Guillermo Rauch
* URL : https://github.com/guille/ms.js
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-oslo.i18n
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : OpenStack Development Mailing List
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/oslo.i18n
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Des
+++ John Holland [2014-07-11 19:09 -0400]:
> Subject says it all - I've been working on this a bit, and I have a few
> problems - I hope these aren't too newbie of questions.
>
> Presently I'm working on EFL, Enlightenment Foundation Library, which
> is the lion's share of the work in terms of dep
On Jul 12, Toni Mueller wrote:
> * Package name: libressl
I am highly doubtful at best.
What are your plans exactly?
Would it have the same SONAME of openssl and conflict+provide it?
Would it be a totally different library which packages would
build-depend on?
Which packages are supposed to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-requests-mock
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Jamie Lennox
* URL : https://github.com/jamielennox/requests-mock
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description
31 matches
Mail list logo
