Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pirate Praveen
* Package name: ruby-fog-brightbox
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Paul Thornthwaite
* URL : https://rubygems.org/gems/fog-brightbox
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Brightbo
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 02:06:45PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Riku,
>
> 2014-04-19 13:26 GMT+02:00 Riku Voipio :
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:00:33PM +0200, Balint Reczey wrote:
> >> Facing last week's Heartbleed [1] bug the need for improving the
> >> security of our systems became more a
You may or may not have noticed that 'arm64' is coming. This a 64-bit
arm architecture also known as 'aarch64' and implemented in the ARM
CPU architecture 'v8'. Apart from iphones there is no publically
available 64-bit silicon yet, but that'll be changing rapidly later
this year and this port will
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Retout
* Package name: apt-transport-tor
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Tim Retout
* URL : https://github.com/diocles/apt-transport-tor
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : APT transport for a
previously on this list Michael Tautschnig contributed:
> > Riding the Heartbleed publicity wave seems unwise, unless you can
> > propose a hardening flag that would have protected users from
> > Heartbleed. Else, Heartbleed merely serves on a example
> > how wallpapering problems over with "harde
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 14:26:59 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
[...]
> Riding the Heartbleed publicity wave seems unwise, unless you can
> propose a hardening flag that would have protected users from
> Heartbleed. Else, Heartbleed merely serves on a example
> how wallpapering problems over with "harde
Hi Riku,
2014-04-19 13:26 GMT+02:00 Riku Voipio :
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:00:33PM +0200, Balint Reczey wrote:
>> Facing last week's Heartbleed [1] bug the need for improving the
>> security of our systems became more apparent than usually. In Debian
>> there are widely used methods for Harden
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:00:33PM +0200, Balint Reczey wrote:
> Facing last week's Heartbleed [1] bug the need for improving the
> security of our systems became more apparent than usually. In Debian
> there are widely used methods for Hardening [2] packages at build time
> and guidelines [3] for
]] Jonas Smedegaard
> How to reconfigure one package from another?
I don't think this is supported today at all, and any success at doing
so would be a bug.
If you have a package that uses debconf as the UI to ask questions that
go into a configuration file, that's fine. If you then later chan
> It may be that libgc upstream's autogen.sh script is not really 'right' in
> some way. But there may well be a lot of upstreams like that, which is
> why maintainers need clear guidance on how to deal with this, without
> having to become autotools experts. i.e how to determine when they can
> ju
10 matches
Mail list logo
