gregor herrmann, le Sun 13 Apr 2014 02:25:18 +0200, a écrit :
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 01:34:52 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > Here is a refreshed list of the packages that should probably use
> > Architecture: linux-any, please consider using it.
>
> > Debian Perl Group
> >libvideo-ivtv-p
2014-04-12 21:46 GMT+05:30, Alberto Salvia Novella :
> Why you choose to develop in Debian over any other distribution?
Because my contributions are respected equally, in most other
distributions my contributions will be treated second class, subject
to wishes of managers, even those who don't con
Shachar Shemesh writes:
> On 13/04/14 05:39, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> One can make a good argument that such checks are exactly what you
>> should be doing.
> Then the answer is very simple. Write in Java.
There are a lot of reasons other than the absolute fastest performance you
can possibly mus
On 13/04/14 05:39, Russ Allbery wrote:
> One can make a good argument that such checks are exactly what you should
> be doing.
Then the answer is very simple. Write in Java.
>> My understanding of things is that undefined behaviors are fairly
>> common, and almost always benign. Look at the followi
Shachar Shemesh writes:
> I will point out that it is not always is possible, and is quite often
> not easy. For example, the famous "undefined after NULL dereference"
> would probably cause a warning every time a function uses a pointer it
> was given without first validating its non-NULLness.
On 12/04/14 23:38, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>> I never did understand what people expect. gcc uses the undefined
> Warn the hell out of any line of code with per-spec undefined behaviour, if
> not by default, at least under -Wall.
I have no ar
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 9:31 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> So, in order to avoid situations like these in the future, please write
> proper changelogs, people! Your future self or the future maintainer
> of your package will be very glad to have them. It can save you or them
> lots of tim
On 04/13/2014 02:25 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> (The git history + d/changelog don't say why I changed this in 2011,
> I guess it was a similar request :))
And now you know why I am always so nitpicky about changelogs :).
As someone who has been reviewing several dozen packages over the past
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 01:34:52 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Here is a refreshed list of the packages that should probably use
> Architecture: linux-any, please consider using it.
> Debian Perl Group
>libvideo-ivtv-perl
% grep Architecture debian/control
Architecture: linux-any kfreebsd-an
Hello,
Here is a refreshed list of the packages that should probably use
Architecture: linux-any, please consider using it.
Samuel
Alexander Wirt
libnfnetlink
libnfnetlink (U)
Andreas Schuldei
uml-utilities (U)
Anibal Monsalve Salazar
apmd
Ard van Breemen
vlan
Cyril Bruleb
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 04:07:24PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> BTW, it'd be nice to have a backport of Jitsi. Not sure how much work
> that would be though (there must be lots of java dependencies...).
I recently installed 2.5.5190-1 on Wheezy without much trouble, but
imho, the operational i
On Sat, Apr 12 2014, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Why you choose to develop in Debian over any other distribution?
Because I could contribute. I looked at other UNIX like
operating systems, and Linux, and then Debian, had the least barriers
to entry for contribution. Why is being abl
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> I never did understand what people expect. gcc uses the undefined
Warn the hell out of any line of code with per-spec undefined behaviour, if
not by default, at least under -Wall.
THAT would be a good start. Too bad not even gcc knows every time it h
Alberto Salvia Novella writes:
> Why you choose to develop in Debian over any other distribution?
Because I have some control over my work, some say in the policies that
affect me, and the freedom to do things the right way, as opposed to
having some manager or company decide on policy without a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams
* Package name: json-schema-validator
Version : 2.3.1
Upstream Author : Zygmunt Krynicki
* URL : https://github.com/zyga/json-schema-validator
* License : LGPL-3.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij
* Package name: bookie
Version : 0.0
Upstream Author : Rick Harding
* URL : http://www.bmark.us/
* License : AGPLv3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Self-hosted bookmark management service
+++ Alberto Salvia Novella [2014-04-12 18:16 +0200]:
> Why you choose to develop in Debian over any other distribution?
Because of the wide architecture support.
That what was what got me involved in the first place.
And I also really liked the regularity of it as a distro, from an
admin/user po
On 12 April 2014 18:16, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Why you choose to develop in Debian over any other distribution?
>
For me, Debian is the best distro. That's my main reason.
Also:
* I use Debian for all (from netbooks, laptops, desktop, to
high-demand servers).
* There is a big communit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthew Vernon
Package name: rsbackup
Version : 0.4.3
Upstream Author : Richard Kettlewell
URL : http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2010/rsbackup.html
License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : rsync-bas
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 18:16:22 +0200
Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Why you choose to develop in Debian over any other distribution?
>
My reasons are personal - I tried lots and lots of other distributions
before finding that Debian suits the way I want a distribution to work
better than any of
Why you choose to develop in Debian over any other distribution?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/534966d6.2020...@gmail.com
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij
* Package name: python-convoy
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : Canonical Javascripters
* URL : http://launchpad.net/convoy/
* License : AGPLv3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : WSGI app for l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij
* Package name: python-breadability
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Rick Harding
* URL : http://github.com/bookieio/breadability
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Reworked P
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Some numbers with my free interpretation from ubuntu popcon:
>> unity is installed in 605_209 machines, but its used regularly only by
>> 46_210
>>
>> Thats a very low number by all metrics for a default desktop [0].
>> People dislike it.
Em 12-04-2014 08:15, Jonas Smedegaard escreveu:
Quoting alberto fuentes (2014-04-12 12:23:46)
I had to leave gnome with gnome3 because it disrupted my workflow so
much i couldn't cope
In my case I like shiny but not at the cost of useful.
xfce4 felt like a less polished gnome2 but at least it
Quoting alberto fuentes (2014-04-12 12:23:46)
> I had to leave gnome with gnome3 because it disrupted my workflow so
> much i couldn't cope
>
> In my case I like shiny but not at the cost of useful.
>
> xfce4 felt like a less polished gnome2 but at least it didn't disrupt
> my workflow.
I am i
tl;dr go to [0]
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> My vote would be on GNOME 3 classic for now, but XFCE with sensible and
> visually appealing defaults would do it for me too.
You are all facing different experiences with end-users because
end-users are probably differe
27 matches
Mail list logo
