Hi Andrew,
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 05:45:02PM -0500, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 09:30:29PM +0100, Andreas Moog wrote:
> > > > Well, I actually do not really the difference.
> > >
> > > The anonscm URL is mi
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Erm. Preventing RC bug fixes from entering the archive doesn't look like
> a win to me (#739807, #739904):
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739807#40
Perhaps the fatal rejects should only be rejects if they are a regres
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> No, packages that aren't in testing only have their urgency ignored if
> it's more than medium. So they're candidates for migration after either
> 5 or 10 days.
Hmm, ok. Thanks for clarifying.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWis
Hi,
Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff:
> Where could I find anybody interested in mentoring this kind of project?
> I've asked on #debian-soc and was directed here.
They probably should have redirected you to debian-mentors.
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libhttp-cookiejar-perl
Version : 0.006
Upstream Author : David Golden
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/HTTP-CookieJar
*
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 09:30:29PM +0100, Andreas Moog wrote:
> > > Well, I actually do not really the difference.
> >
> > The anonscm URL is missing the /svn/ part.
>
> No, it is not.
It is though. Compare what you tried:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2
FOUR people made a decision that would once have required
thousands of votes. FOUR votes overrideds the decision
debian took before the tech-ctte dictatorship to standardize
on system V init rather than bsd style init scripts
The tech-ctte was created to arbitrate and decide disputes
between pack
Andreas Tille (2014-03-01):
> which used to work previously as well. I opened a ticket this morning
> at rt.debian.org but I think this might interest people here on this
> list as well.
ticket in rt for alioth? I think you want to check this:
https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth#Maintenance
Mraw,
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 08:33:29PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Whether the first URL should work is a different question, but changing
> the path as well as the hostname isn't really "simply trying" a
> different host.
I was trying the old form to specify SVN URLs and the new form. Both
are s
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 09:30:29PM +0100, Andreas Moog wrote:
> > Well, I actually do not really the difference.
>
> The anonscm URL is missing the /svn/ part.
No, it is not.
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
On 01.03.2014 21:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 07:02:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 18:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> $ svn checkout
>>> svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/phyutility/trunk
>> [...]
>>> Simply trying svn.debian.
On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 21:14 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 07:02:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 18:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > $ svn checkout
> > > svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/phyutility/trunk
> > [...]
> > > Simp
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 09:19:37PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-03-01 21:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Well, I actually do not really the difference. As far as I know both -
> > specifically anonscm which is verified by lintian - should work and it
> > does not.
>
> Verified is the wrong
On 2014-03-01 21:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> [...]
>
> Well, I actually do not really the difference. As far as I know both -
> specifically anonscm which is verified by lintian - should work and it
> does not.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
Verified is the wrong word here.
Hi Adam,
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 07:02:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 18:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > $ svn checkout
> > svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/phyutility/trunk
> [...]
> > Simply trying svn.debian.org works perfectly
> >
> > $ svn ch
On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 18:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> $ svn checkout
> svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/phyutility/trunk
[...]
> Simply trying svn.debian.org works perfectly
>
> $ svn checkout
> svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/phyutility/trunk
That's not
Joerg Jaspert (2014-02-09):
> Lets see, the following license-problem-* sound interesting beside the
> json-evil we already have:
>
> license-problem-font-adobe-copyrighted-fragment (14 packages, 3032 tags, plus
> 3539 overrides)
> license-problem-font-adobe-copyrighted-fragment-no-credit (7 pac
Hello everyone,
I'd like to make Pantheon (the DE from elementary project,
http://elementaryos.org) available in Debian. I'm the guy responsible for
most of PPA packaging in elementary, so I know the software in question and
have experience packaging and integrating it.
It's been suggested as a G
Hi,
just a single example (for the reason to have only few data - it works
with *any* package I tried):
$ svn checkout
svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/phyutility/trunk
svn: E210005: Unable to connect to a repository at URL
'svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jean Schurger
* Package name: libwfd
Version : 0.0.0
Upstream Author : David Herrmann
* URL : http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/miraclecast
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : Library for Wif
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 13:18:02 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> > AFAICT, it's 5 days now.
>
> The default urgency in dch is medium now, which britney interprets as
> 5 days for existing packages. Packages that aren't in testing have
> their
Dear Free Software contributor*
I'm currently in the process of writing my diploma thesis. I've worked hard
during the last few weeks and months on a questionnaire [1] which shall
collect some data for my thesis. Furthermore the data of this survey will be
interesting for the Free Software comm
Hello,
El 28/02/2014 11:36, "Solal Rastier" escribió:
>
> Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed?
The reply was given at this thread.
There are people that think like you (if you think that should be removed).
See gnewsense [1], maybe you prefer that distro than Debian.
Reg
23 matches
Mail list logo
