Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoit
* Package name: gap-io
Version : 4.2
Upstream Author : Max Neunhoeffer
* URL :
http://www-circa.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~neunhoef/Computer/Software/Gap/io.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, GAP
Descrip
Le Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:47:46PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
>
> I think that it would make more sense if a current member of the release team
> filed that bug on behalf of the release team.
I agree and need to say that I am surprised to read so many emails complaining
for the release team,
Op 05-01-14 15:57, Clint Adams schreef:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 05:07:29PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> This goes for GPLvX "or later", but also for other "or later" licenses,
>> where they exist.
>>
>> I'm convinced that the GPLv2 is a free license, but I'm so far undecided
>> on the GPLv3 (
Hi Dimitri,
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:22:09 +, Dimitri John Ledkov
wrote:
> But GPL text does confuse me as a whole, no modifications nor derivate
> works of the GPL license text are allowed, and the original text has
> "and later" clause - is licensing without "and later" constitues
> modificati
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 06:46:02PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Looking into the d-d-a archives, I find something about NMUs during
> BSPs in May 2007 (<20070513172244.ga14...@solar.ftbfs.de>) for the
> last time, and then (and since then, e.g.
> <47ccf6ce.7050...@debian.org> in March 2008) the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko
* Package name: pyhusl
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author : Alexei Boronine
* URL : https://github.com/boronine/pyhusl
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : conversions for HUSL (
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:26:14 -0500
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Delegation for the Release Team"):
> >> On 06/01/14 at 11:56 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> >> > Explicitly again: Please see the last 7 years worth of bits
On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 15:24:40 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
FWIW, I have no strong opinion if something about NMU rules should be
in the RT delegation; just adding some experiences / data points:
> > Do you see a problem with the current NMU recommended practices, that
> > you would like to fix? [...
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Delegation for the Release Team"):
>> On 06/01/14 at 11:56 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> > Explicitly again: Please see the last 7 years worth of bits mails, where
>> > the release team have lowered this without advan
On 06/01/14 at 15:24 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Delegation for the Release Team"):
> > Also, I'm surprised that you didn't comment on the last part of my mail.
>
> (Regarding the TC.) Well, of course I'm on the TC and the TC has the
> power to rule on disputes about t
Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Delegation for the Release Team"):
> On 06/01/14 at 12:59 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Given Lucas's attitude, I would like to suggest to the release team
> > that they file a bug against the the Developers' Reference, containing
> > a proposed change explicitly authori
On 6 January 2014 15:07, David Weinehall wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 03:13:01AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 10:58:32AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > That's also why I *don't* use BSD-style licenses for software that
> > > I write, but rather GPLv2 or LGPLv2.1
Alastair McKinstry writes ("Re: 'tty' output on kFreeBSD, etc. within sbuild"):
> On 06/01/2014 12:39, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > But perhaps more information would enable us to give better advice.
>
> Thanks, I've been able to adapt the build scripts so it is not necessary;
> they just output to stdou
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 03:13:01AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 10:58:32AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> > That's also why I *don't* use BSD-style licenses for software that
> > I write, but rather GPLv2 or LGPLv2.1.
>
> So if someone takes your LGPLv2.1-only software and
On 06/01/14 at 12:59 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Delegation for the Release Team"):
> > On 06/01/14 at 11:56 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > > Explicitly again: Please see the last 7 years worth of bits mails, where
> > > the release team have lowered this without advanc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: kde-connect
Version: 1.0
Upstream Author: Albert Vaca Cintora
URL: http://albertvaka.wordpress.com/
License: GPL
Description: set of plugins and services for kde to integrate mobile
devices
On 06/01/2014 12:39, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Alastair McKinstry writes ("'tty' output on kFreeBSD, etc. within sbuild"):
>> Can anyone answer the following question which is puzzling me;
>> I have a piece of csh code which gets called during the build of a package
>> i'm maintaining. it does the follo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: plasmate
Version: 1.0
Upstream Author: Plasma Workspaces team
URL: http://projects.kde.org/plasmate
License: GPL2
Description: small IDE taylored for development of Plasma components, such
Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Delegation for the Release Team"):
> On 06/01/14 at 11:56 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Explicitly again: Please see the last 7 years worth of bits mails, where
> > the release team have lowered this without advance notice, for BSPs etc.
...
> First, I do not think tha
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> Upstart doesn't directly make use of the LSB headers -- it just calls back
> onto
Ah okay, thanks for this explanation!
(I’ve switched back to sysvinit for now.)
On Sat, 4 Jan 2014, Roger Leigh wrote:
> It might be safer to do something like this:
Alastair McKinstry writes ("'tty' output on kFreeBSD, etc. within sbuild"):
> Can anyone answer the following question which is puzzling me;
> I have a piece of csh code which gets called during the build of a package
> i'm maintaining. it does the following:
>
> echo "useful information" > /dev/t
Guillem Jover writes ("Re: [DEP 8] About "XS-Testsuite: autopkgtest": time to
remove "XS-" ?"):
> On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 19:40:54 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > No, it just means that I gave up.
>
> Oh, ok. :/ Personally I see it has similar drawbacks to the discarded
> Build-Options field that some
Hi,
On 06/01/14 at 11:56 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 01:23:42PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to note that the discussion on this delegation was inconclusive
> > on a couple of points:
> >
> > 1) it does not include anything about defining rules for NMU
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 01:23:42PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> I'd like to note that the discussion on this delegation was inconclusive
> on a couple of points:
>
> 1) it does not include anything about defining rules for NMU delays.
>
> The last time the NMU "policy" was changed was in 201
On Sun, 5 Jan 2014, Clint Adams wrote:
> because any code under this license would be deliberately incompatible
> with anything else FOR NO GOOD REASON.
Uhm, then stop advocating the GNU GPL, which is deliberately incompatible
with anything else FOR NO GOOD REASON.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
[16:04:33
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fabian Greffrath
* Package name: fonts-croscore
Version : 1.23.0
* URL : http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromeos-localmirror/distfiles/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: TTF
Description : width-compatible fonts f
26 matches
Mail list logo
