Re: virtual/alternative B-D (was Re: libtiff5 transition)

2013-12-06 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:38:47PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2013-12-06, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Hm indeed. Makes me wonder whether it would not be better to make > > libtiff-dev the real package and abandon libtiffN-dev altogether. > > (Never understood why the -dev packages need the num

Re: IPMI/LOM/DRAC/ILO/etc. (was Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status)

2013-12-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:32:32 +0100 (CET), Thorsten Glaser wrote: >On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > >> Does it have IPMI, LOM/DRAC/ILO/some sort of remote management or is all >> that serial console + networked power switch? I suspect Debian would be > >Isn’t “serial console + networked

Bug#731554: ITP: liblwp-authen-oauth2-perl -- Make requests to OAuth2 APIs from Perl

2013-12-06 Thread Alexander Dutton
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alexander Dutton * Package name: liblwp-authen-oauth2-perl Version : 0.07 Upstream Author : Ben Tilly * URL : https://github.com/btilly/perl-oauth2 * License : Artistic Programming Lang: Perl Description : Make r

Re: virtual/alternative B-D (was Re: libtiff5 transition)

2013-12-06 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2013-12-06, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> Hm indeed. Makes me wonder whether it would not be better to make >> libtiff-dev the real package and abandon libtiffN-dev altogether. >> (Never understood why the -dev packages need the numbers, anyway.) > > The -dev packages needs

Re: virtual/alternative B-D (was Re: libtiff5 transition)

2013-12-06 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2013-12-06, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Hm indeed. Makes me wonder whether it would not be better to make > libtiff-dev the real package and abandon libtiffN-dev altogether. > (Never understood why the -dev packages need the numbers, anyway.) The -dev packages needs numbers if you want to have se

Re: virtual/alternative B-D (was Re: libtiff5 transition)

2013-12-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Simon McVittie wrote: >As far as I can see, changing from (libtiffN-dev Provides libtiff-dev, >libtiff(N+1)-dev does not) to the other way round has an inherent race Hm indeed. Makes me wonder whether it would not be better to make libtiff-dev the real package and abandon libtiffN-dev altogether.

Re: virtual/alternative B-D (was Re: libtiff5 transition)

2013-12-06 Thread Simon McVittie
On 06/12/13 10:56, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:19:14AM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: >>> * If your package build-depends on libtiff5-dev, you don't HAVE to do >>>anything, but you may be helping yourself in the future if you cha

Re: virtual/alternative B-D (was Re: libtiff5 transition)

2013-12-06 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:19:14AM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > > * If your package build-depends on libtiff5-dev, you don't HAVE to do > >anything, but you may be helping yourself in the future if you change > >the build dependency to libtiff

Bug#731526: ITP: radosgw-agent -- Synchronize data and users between radosgw clusters

2013-12-06 Thread James Page
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: James Page * Package name: radosgw-agent Version : 1.1 * URL : http://github.com/ceph/radosgw-agent * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description : Synchronize data and users between radosgw clusters RADOS

virtual/alternative B-D (was Re: libtiff5 transition)

2013-12-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > * If your package build-depends on libtiff5-dev, you don't HAVE to do >anything, but you may be helping yourself in the future if you change >the build dependency to libtiff-dev (>> 4.0.3-6~). Uhm, I have a rather general question here. libtiff