On 2013-11-05 21:13, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> Yes, I think that's a good idea; it would avoid issues where
>> maintainers are waiting on porters and vice versa, since the
>> reassigning of a bug to a port pseudopackage would make it clear who's
>> waitin
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:33:14PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op 05-11-13 19:52, Dominic Hamon schreef:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Dominic Hamon
> >
> > * Package name: ndt
> > Version : 3.6.5.2
> > * URL : http://www.internet2.edu/performan
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I'd find it very nice if we had, by default, DNSSEC resolving in Debian,
I've been running this configuration for a while (using unbound on my
laptop) and during my recent travels in Europe I discovered networks
that are problematic in som
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:43:16PM +0100, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:07:36 +0200
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > I think that it would be a failure of the Debian project if we had to have
> > a GR
> > about such a technical decision. I think that we need to trust that the
>
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:07:36 +0200
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I think that it would be a failure of the Debian project if we had to have a
> GR
> about such a technical decision. I think that we need to trust that the
> Technical Committee will make the right decision. A GR about this will likely
>
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Well, I did ask for the creation of port-specific tags back at
> debconf8 (if I'm not mistaken), but you told me to go for usertags
> instead ;-)
Sounds familiar. Usertags have the advantage of not requiring me to do
any work. But presumably at the tim
Op 05-11-13 20:40, Steven Chamberlain schreef:
[pseudopackages]
> Would that be only for generic issues with a port, not specific to a
> package? I doubt this would be used much. These bugs might typically
> be reassigned to kernel packages or eglibc anyway.
Eventually, yes, but that doesn't mat
Hi,
On 05/11/13 18:50, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> This sounds like a case where we should turn these usertags into fully
>> fledged tags. [Or alternatively, they should just be made usertags under
>> the debian-po...@lists.debian.org user or similar.]
Eith
Op 05-11-13 19:52, Dominic Hamon schreef:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Dominic Hamon
>
> * Package name: ndt
> Version : 3.6.5.2
> * URL : http://www.internet2.edu/performance/ndt/
> * License : BSD
> Programming Lang: C, C++, Java
> Descript
Op 05-11-13 19:50, Don Armstrong schreef:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> In this regard; I am guilty of filing some those bugs without tagging
>>> them. Honestly, adding the tags get a bit in the way right now. If a
>>> package FTBFS
Control: reassign -1 wnpp
On Ma, 05 nov 13, 13:41:00, Folkert van Heusden (Hackerspace Gouda) wrote:
> Package: f-irc
>
> > Subject: RFP: f-irc -- an irc-client for the console/terminal
Please note that RFP bugs should be filed against the wnpp
pseudo-package (I already took care of this one).
On 29/10/13 at 22:42 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 24/10/13 18:31, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > What's the the status of XFCE regarding accessibility?
> >
> > That was a big strengh of GNOME for a long time, though I've heard
> > rumors (sorry not to be more specific) that gnome-shell has
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > In this regard; I am guilty of filing some those bugs without tagging
> > them. Honestly, adding the tags get a bit in the way right now. If a
> > package FTBFS on 4 architectures, I have to dig up 3-4 differ
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Niels Thykier wrote:
> In this regard; I am guilty of filing some those bugs without tagging
> them. Honestly, adding the tags get a bit in the way right now. If a
> package FTBFS on 4 architectures, I have to dig up 3-4 different
> usertags (with different "user") and associat
Niels Thykier writes ("Re: Potential issues for most ports (Was: Re: Bits from
the Release Team (Jessie freeze info))"):
> On 2013-11-03 16:03, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=jessie_or_sid&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&kfreebsd=1&sortby=severity&sorto=desc&cseverity
Op 03-11-13 19:05, Marko Randjelovic schreef:
> On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 12:32:40 +0100
> Bastian Blank wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:15:36AM +0100, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
>>> Just to say we should not expect to much from DNSSEC because DNSSEC is
>>> centralized:
>>
>> Could you explain the
Op 03-11-13 16:21, Thomas Goirand schreef:
> On 10/30/2013 10:56 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> At any rate, my main point was that we should not default to using a
>> system-local recursive resolver which ignores the ISP-provided one, just
>> because that's the "easiest" way to do DNSSEC these days
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 01:14:28PM +0100, Joshuah Hurst wrote:
> ...
>> - Despite being much more powerful, the binary package should be half
>> the size of the current 'unstable' Debian package size
>
> Yes. But this phenomenon is true f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-bioc-xvector
Version : 0.2.0-1
Upstream Author : H. Pages
* URL :
http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/XVector.html
* License : Artistic-2.0
Programming Lang: R
Desc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexandre Gramfort
* Package name: python-mne
Version : 0.7.git
Upstream Author : Alexandre Gramfort
* URL : https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python m
Hi
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 01:14:28PM +0100, Joshuah Hurst wrote:
...
> - Despite being much more powerful, the binary package should be half
> the size of the current 'unstable' Debian package size
Yes. But this phenomenon is true for almost all binary packages.
I initially thought I broke the
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: ольга крыжановская
Date: 5 November 2013 02:15
Subject: astksh.2013-10-10 Debian prototype package
To: Oliver Kiddle , Oliver Kiddle
, Cedric Blancher ,
Giovanni Rapagnani , Phi Debian
, WNPP Monitor
I have uploaded a prototype of the new ksh De
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: jdependency
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Torsten Curdt
* URL : https://github.com/tcurdt/jdependency
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Java library analy
Hi,
I cross posted the following message on my blog:
http://blog.mister-muffin.de/2013/11/05/announcing-bootstrap.debian.net/
While [botch][1] produces loads of valuable data to help maintainers modifying
the right source packages with build profiles and thus make Debian
bootstrappable, it has s
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:53:05AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [1] I certainly wouldn't have space for something like this:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Z800_2066_JKU.jpeg
>
> (and much less the money. Yeah I know that is technically not an s390,
> but as I understand it, an s390 sho
25 matches
Mail list logo
