Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Panlener
* Package name: multi2sim
Version : 4.1.0
Upstream Author : Rafael Ubal
* URL : http://www.multi2sim.org/
* License : (GPL-3)
Programming Lang: (C)
Description : CPU-GPU Simulator for Heterogeneo
Le 7 juin 2013 05:18, "Paul Wise" a écrit :
>
> I would suggest the approach taken by the recent GSoC projects related
> to bootstrapping new ports. Multi-stage builds. First stage without
> docs and second stage with docs. Only the second stage gets uploaded
> to Debian.
>
> http://wiki.debian.or
2013/6/7 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> Hi everyone. First of all, I'm cross-posting this between legal and devel
> because I really don't know to which of them belongs (or maybe it does in
> both).
>
> The issue is this: Qt 5 has grown so large (850+MB unpacked in the single-
> source tar
I would suggest the approach taken by the recent GSoC projects related
to bootstrapping new ports. Multi-stage builds. First stage without
docs and second stage with docs. Only the second stage gets uploaded
to Debian.
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianBootstrap
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/P
Hi everyone. First of all, I'm cross-posting this between legal and devel
because I really don't know to which of them belongs (or maybe it does in
both).
The issue is this: Qt 5 has grown so large (850+MB unpacked in the single-
source tarball, will continue growing) that upstream also provides
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 12:24:02PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> It seems that now, we can do this, but the cookbook also says this is
> not here yet:
>
> start on started network-services
>
> I don't know how systemd behaves in this way (so this is not something
> to hold against upstart), bu
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 488 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 142 (new: 4)
Total number of packages request
On Thursday, June 06, 2013 16:30:48, Roger Lynn wrote:
> On 06/06/13 14:00, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 15:35:14, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 19:53:59 -0400, Chris Knadle
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> >Attempting to use an FQDN is also troublesome, because Exim tries
Subject: ITP: ruby-rinku -- autolinker for Ruby
Package: wnpp
Owner: Per Andersson
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ruby-rinku
Version : 1.7.3
Upstream Author : Vicent Marti
* URL : http://github.com/vmg/rinku
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: C, Ruby
De
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 22:40 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 22:01:48 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> > It was Linus' decree that no new ABI is allowed to suffer from the Y2k38
> > bug even if its word size is 32 bit, and I'd say he's right. This means
> > that this problem
On 05/06/13 12:10, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I've switched 3 users from Squeeze to Wheezy in the last 2 weeks, and also to
> Gnome 3 btw, and they all *love* it. And I also must say, I'm quite
> impressed,
> Debian on the desktop has come a long way. So, IOW YMMV.
We spend a lot of effort to packa
On 06/06/13 14:00, Chris Knadle wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 15:35:14, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 19:53:59 -0400, Chris Knadle
>> wrote:
>> >Attempting to use an FQDN is also troublesome, because Exim tries to use
>> >DNS to look up the FQDN, and falls back to using 'uname -n'
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:58:00AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> It's not quite as bad as the porting required for large file support,
>> but the consequences of not porting are worse.
> How come? I don't think runtime bugs that are not some kind of a Y2k38
> bug are lik
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 22:01:48 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> It was Linus' decree that no new ABI is allowed to suffer from the Y2k38
> bug even if its word size is 32 bit, and I'd say he's right. This means
> that this problem will bite us the next time another 32 bit arch comes,
> so there's
I've assisted a number of people with various distributions, and I will tell
you right now that there is only one new user-friendly way to do it: provide a
DE out of the box, and choose it for them. People will generally not research
and do not know which is "better". They are willing to try som
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:13:50PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:11:49PM +0200, Bjoern Meier wrote:
> [...]
> > Ok, an example. my Girlfriend was really pissed of Win8. She hate it
> > (for good reasons). She came to me and asked:"Can you show me Linux
> > and how it wor
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:11:49PM +0200, Bjoern Meier wrote:
[...]
> Ok, an example. my Girlfriend was really pissed of Win8. She hate it
> (for good reasons). She came to me and asked:"Can you show me Linux
> and how it works?". I sweat blood, but I took my honor.
> After a successful install sh
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Re cdn:
>
> IIRC the main blocker was that it plays with DNS records and would be a bit
> painful to have to support such a configuration in part due to DNSSEC.
If you're not afraid of such hacks, CNAME-to-CNAME can simplify DNS
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Re cdn:
>>
>> IIRC the main blocker was that it plays with DNS records and would be a
>> bit painful to have to support such a configuration in part due to
>> DNSSEC.
>
> And it uses the location of the DNS
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:58:00AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Thorsten Glaser writes:
>
> > No complaints against x32 per sé, I want to crossgrade there once it’s
> > in, but for as long as it’s broken like this, it doesn’t make it look
> > good.
>
> Be aware that x32 has sizeof(time_t) > size
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:31:12PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2013-06-06 12:40, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Which begs the question if build management should be merged into
> dak to provide insight about which package is new. Obviously this
> could also be a defined interface but if we're going
On 2013-06-06 12:40, Joachim Breitner wrote:
if the DPAs get wanna-build support (which I hope) you certainly don’t
want to handle nmu and gb requests for every developer’s pet
repositories, so there will be a need for a general interface. Can this
be done using dcut files, just as with other DPA
hi,
2013/6/6 Russ Allbery :
> Bjoern Meier writes:
>
>> Freedom is not only that you have a choice, you have to know what your
>> decision and the consequences will be. Unmanageable? Really?
>
>> I done LFS a weeks ago, was that unmanageable? No. It's not. Yeah Debian
>> is not LFS, but I rember
In order for there to be any sensible decision about whether we should
switch the default init system in Debian, all of the different camps
need to summarize their arguments and counter-arguments, ideally with
data.
To this end, I have started outlining some of the open questions I see
in deciding
On 06/06/2013 03:11 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> You are of course aware of the boot menu: Advanced Options ->
> Alternative Desktop Environment.
Yes. But it should be in d-i, when you choose to install a desktop. Not
in syslinux, when you are supposed to choose what kind of installer to
start. It
On 06/06/2013 02:25 PM, Bjoern Meier wrote:
> the problem - IMHO - is
> linux (as the kernel itself and tool-distributions) is getting fat and
> kills his own advantages.
Time to try Hurd or kFreeBSD? :)
(note: I'd like to have more time to invest in them myself, and I
perfectly understand that no
If you do discover how to do this reliably, I'd be interested in your solution.
If you/someone else feels it's too unrelated to this list, feel free to email
me directly, but I think this is generally interesting.
Ron Scott-Adams
r...@tohuw.net
"The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack
Bjoern Meier writes:
> Freedom is not only that you have a choice, you have to know what your
> decision and the consequences will be. Unmanageable? Really?
> I done LFS a weeks ago, was that unmanageable? No. It's not. Yeah Debian
> is not LFS, but I rember the install-process on potato. That
hi,
2013/6/6 Ben Hutchings :
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:34:35AM +0200, Bjoern Meier wrote:
>> 0hi,
>>
>> 2013/6/6 Chow Loong Jin :
>> > On 06/06/2013 06:54, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> >> On 2013-06-05 15:02:35 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >>> Did I miss anything?
>> >>
>> >> I
On Thursday, June 06, 2013 13:18:39, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Chris Knadle [130606 14:53]:
> > I'm glad you asked this, because it prompted me to investigate further.
> > This was something I was told was commonly done, but it looks now like
> > it might be a misnomer. I'm not able to find a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Delvaux
* Package name: scandir
Version : 0.1+git
Upstream Author : Ben Hoyt
* URL : https://github.com/benhoyt/scandir
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Better directory ite
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> >But why on earth did very simple thing like multihead management break?
>
> Very simple thing ‽ Clearly, you have no idea.
It was functional and working for me in Squeeze it doesnt now.
Wheezy is supposed to use monitors
2013/6/6 Florian Lohoff :
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:19:04PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> That said, we provide GNOME Classic in wheezy for good reasons. Some of
>> Florian’s concerns are clearly among them.
>
> I have tried that and the annoyances with the systray, multihead and
> nautilus
* Chris Knadle [130606 14:53]:
> I'm glad you asked this, because it prompted me to investigate further. This
> was something I was told was commonly done, but it looks now like it might be
> a misnomer. I'm not able to find a concrete example of a system that allows
> SMTP MTA transfers but
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> No complaints against x32 per sé, I want to crossgrade there once it’s
> in, but for as long as it’s broken like this, it doesn’t make it look
> good.
Be aware that x32 has sizeof(time_t) > sizeof(long), so you should expect
SUBSTANTIAL porting of packages to be require
udev sucks! Debian should hire a developer to replace all uses of CDBS
with dh! Perl should be replaced with Python in essential! All packages
need to switch to 3.0 (quilt)! Native packages should be banned! No one
should ever be allowed to NMU anything ever if the maintainer says no!
Did
On Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
> udev sucks! Debian should hire a developer to replace all uses of CDBS
> with dh! Perl should be replaced with Python in essential! All packages
> need to switch to 3.0 (quilt)! Native packages should be banned! No one
> should ever be allowed
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:34:35AM +0200, Bjoern Meier wrote:
> 0hi,
>
> 2013/6/6 Chow Loong Jin :
> > On 06/06/2013 06:54, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> >> On 2013-06-05 15:02:35 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> Did I miss anything?
> >>
> >> I don't understand at all how you could h
On 2013-06-06 15:35, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
I still think it schizo that x32 is only halfway in and the Linux
kernel Debian team mostly sends signals that it wants to block the
architecture altogether. And the multilibs thing… nobody seems to
have commented on it either.
Sometimes it helps if e
On 05/31/2013 12:27 AM, Philip Hands wrote:
> Well, I'd say that at least part of the motivation was actually to write
> a qmail replacement, that didn't have someone with DJB's atitute to
> licensing as upstream -- it was for a long time called vmailer
> (v==vapour) as coined by DJB, and adopted b
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:27:15AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:23:14AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > tglase@tglase:~ $ fgrep X32 /boot/config-3.9-1-amd64
> > # CONFIG_X86_X32 is not set
>
> See http://wiki.debian.org/X32Port and
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-dev
On 06/06/2013 15:31, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:19:04PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
That said, we provide GNOME Classic in wheezy for good reasons. Some of
Florian’s concerns are clearly among them.
I have tried that and the annoyances with the systray, multihead and
n
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:31:43PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Julien Danjou
>
> * Package name: python-first
> Version : 2.0.0
> Upstream Author : Hynek Schlawack
> * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/first
> * License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Danjou
* Package name: python-first
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Hynek Schlawack
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/first
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : simple function that r
Helmut Grohne subdivi.de> writes:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg00355.html
Ah okay. That one got lost in GMane’s threading because the original
mail wasn’t posted in this newsgroup.
I still think it schizo that x32 is only halfway in and the Linux
kernel Debian team mostly s
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:19:04PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> That said, we provide GNOME Classic in wheezy for good reasons. Some of
> Florian’s concerns are clearly among them.
I have tried that and the annoyances with the systray, multihead and
nautilus manages backdrop are the same.
I a
Eric Dorland debian.org> writes:
> Sorry about that. Generally how I transition to a new upstream version
> is to update the automake package and then upload a new automake1.X
> package after that. So I will be uploading an automake1.11 package
> shortly to fix this.
OK, thank you!
(I think yo
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 02:07:38PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> You're right, in that the "interface" that a user has to exim-on-debian is
> update-exim4.conf.conf, rather than exim4's configuration directly; however,
> length aside, I don't see this as a strength, but a serious source of
> con
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:38:52PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 16:53:56 +0200, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> >I think that ease of configurability is a major plus for Postfix when
> >compared to Exim, since a common configurations is just a few lines long.
>
> How many
On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 15:35:14, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 19:53:59 -0400, Chris Knadle
>
> wrote:
> >On Sunday, June 02, 2013 17:10:02, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> Exim's default in the packages is not to send authentication data over
> >> a non-encrypted connection. The debconf cod
2013/6/6 Joachim Breitner :
> [..]
> Can this be done using dcut files, just as with other DPA management commands?
That would be fine.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 06.06.2013, 12:24 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:10:39PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > I think, most of developers are clever enough to define, whether the
> > built failed "accidentally" and needs to be restarted, or it requires
> > some fixing an
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:49:41PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
[..snip..]
> If they told us we could call it Firefox without compromising our ability
> to maintain the packages to the quality standards that Debian users
> expect, we would happily change the branding back, because we know it's
> con
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Re cdn:
>
> IIRC the main blocker was that it plays with DNS records and would be a bit
> painful to have to support such a configuration in part due to DNSSEC.
And it uses the location of the DNS resolver of the user, which we
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:10:39PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> I think, most of developers are clever enough to define, whether the
> built failed "accidentally" and needs to be restarted, or it requires
> some fixing and uploading new version. It will save time for both DDs
> and wb-team.
Genera
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:23:14AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> tglase@tglase:~ $ fgrep X32 /boot/config-3.9-1-amd64
> # CONFIG_X86_X32 is not set
See http://wiki.debian.org/X32Port and
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg00355.html
Helmut
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-deve
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2013, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> I have updated texmacs package today and saw that many
> type1 fonts contained in texmacs-common got error messages
> "font-adobe-copyrighted-fragment" by lintian.
>
> I remembered that there were discussions about proprietry
> code of adob
Le 6 juin 2013 07:20, "Atsuhito Kohda" a
écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I have updated texmacs package today and saw that many
> type1 fonts contained in texmacs-common got error messages
> "font-adobe-copyrighted-fragment" by lintian.
>
> I remembered that there were discussions about proprietry
> code of a
Hi!
The latest sid upgrades produce dependencies on:
ii libc6-dev-x322.17-5
i386 Embedded GNU C Library: X32 ABI Development Libraries for
AMD64
ii libc6-x322.17-5
hi,
2013/6/6 Andrei POPESCU :
> On Jo, 06 iun 13, 13:58:24, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>
>> Feel free to contribute it. I would welcome it. I too, feel like its a
>> shame that there's no dialog to choose which desktop you want (even if
>> we have specialized CDs, I prefer the netinst ones, and there,
On Jo, 06 iun 13, 13:58:24, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> Feel free to contribute it. I would welcome it. I too, feel like its a
> shame that there's no dialog to choose which desktop you want (even if
> we have specialized CDs, I prefer the netinst ones, and there, such a
> dialog would be a very goo
61 matches
Mail list logo
