On 13178 March 1977, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Charles Plessy writes:
>> Le Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:36:03AM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont a écrit :
>> - Bonus question: since mentors.debian.net seems to be hosted in Germany,
>> does it mean that developers living in the US should refrain from
>> u
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Pitt
* Package name: fatrace
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Martin Pitt
* URL : https://launchpad.net/fatrace
* License : GPL 3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : report system wide file access events
fa
Nikolaus Rath writes:
> More interesting (in my opinion): if US developers can safely upload
> crypto packages to US hosted debian servers, but Debian then makes these
> packages available to everyone in the world for download, why isn't this
> export of cryptographic packages a problem for Debia
Charles Plessy writes:
> Le Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:36:03AM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont a écrit :
> - Bonus question: since mentors.debian.net seems to be hosted in Germany,
> does it mean that developers living in the US should refrain from
> uploading
> crypto to it ? How do other dist
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> Progress, reported by debootstrap does not look monotonic.
>
> Do I miss something?
The debian-boot list might be a better place to discuss this.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ..
Le Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:09:16PM -0500, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
>
> > - If mentors.debian.org can distribute unreviewed packages by becomming a
> > DMCA safe harbor, wouldn't it be possible for
> > ftp-master.debian.org/NEW.html ?
>
> The difference is that one is open to the public an
Progress, reported by debootstrap does not look monotonic.
Do I miss something?
.
254
255 P: 2243294 76407470
256
257 P: 2289076 76407470<< - HERE
258
259 I: VALIDATING
260
261 IA: aptitude
262
263 IF: Validating %s
264
265 I: RETRIEVING
266
267 IA: aptitude
Le mercredi 10 avril 2013 21:33:32, Andreas Henriksson a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> I request assistance with maintaining the iproute2 package.
>
> Help is welcome in all areas, but following ones would be
> extra appreciated:
>
> "Please perform a full source scan and docume
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the iproute2 package.
Help is welcome in all areas, but following ones would be
extra appreciated:
"Please perform a full source scan and document all licensing information."
As requested by ftp-masters.
Triaging bugs listed a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Apollon Oikonomopoulos
* Package name: ruby-rpatricia
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Tatsuya Mori
* URL : http://www.goto.info.waseda.ac.jp/~tatsuya/rpatricia/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description :
[Charles Plessy]
> - If mentors.debian.org needs to follow the DMCA, why would
> mentors.debian.net be exempt of it ?
It's not exempt, but it's also not Debian's problem.
> - If mentors.debian.org can distribute unreviewed packages by becomming a
> DMCA safe harbor, wouldn't it be po
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: libcommons-jexl2-java
Version : 2.1.1
Upstream Author : Java Expression Language (JEXL) 2.x
* URL : http://commons.apache.org/jexl
* License : Apache License 2.0
Programming Lang: Java
D
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:11:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > On 04/10/2013 05:36 PM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> > > The first point has been handled by zack, and we have on hand a legal
> > > document,
> > > vetted by SF
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:51:39PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> - If mentors.debian.org needs to follow the DMCA, why would
> mentors.debian.net be exempt of it ?
It's not, but Debian is not hosting mentors, the .net domain is a forwarding
service
of sorts, so to take on the responsibilit
Jon Dowland wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:33:20PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>> This ruby gem is needed by FPM (see my ITP[0]).
>
>Hi Laurent, thanks for the clarification â to ask a related question.
>What's the worth of FPM on Debian? Especially given the issues that
>Wouter has rais
Le Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:36:03AM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont a écrit :
>
> For mentors.debian.net, there are two main blockers for a .org transition:
> - Seeking an answer to this redistribution without verification problem
> - Making the codebase acceptable for DSA administration
>
> The first
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:11:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 05:36 PM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> > The first point has been handled by zack, and we have on hand a legal
> > document,
> > vetted by SFLC lawyers, that makes the mentors platform a "DMCA safe
> > harbor".
>
> Doe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Olivier Sallou
* Package name: libcofoja-java
Version : 1.0~r139
Upstream Author : Google Inc
* URL : https://code.google.com/p/cofoja/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Java framework with ann
]] Jonathan Dowland
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:11:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > On 04/10/2013 05:36 PM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> > > The first point has been handled by zack, and we have on hand a legal
> > > document,
> > > vetted by SFLC lawyers, that makes the mentors platform a
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:33:20PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> This ruby gem is needed by FPM (see my ITP[0]).
Hi Laurent, thanks for the clarification — to ask a related question.
What's the worth of FPM on Debian? Especially given the issues that
Wouter has raised in the bug¹
¹ http://b
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:11:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 05:36 PM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> > The first point has been handled by zack, and we have on hand a legal
> > document,
> > vetted by SFLC lawyers, that makes the mentors platform a "DMCA safe
> > harbor".
>
> Do
On 04/10/2013 05:36 PM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> The first point has been handled by zack, and we have on hand a legal
> document,
> vetted by SFLC lawyers, that makes the mentors platform a "DMCA safe harbor".
Does it mean that it is mandatory that mentors is hosted in USA?
Thomas
--
To UN
* Joachim Breitner [2013-04-10 10:13:25 +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 09.04.2013, 17:54 +0200 schrieb Bernd Zeimetz:
> > > Suggestion #3: have a system where any other DD can review
> > > a package in the NEW queue, not only the FTP masters or the
> > > FTP assistants.
> >
> > That would i
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:11:05AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:25:30PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > makes a lot of sense. If your packaging workflow does not rely on
> > importing the contents of release tarballs, then for projects like
> > this you miss some content
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:11:05AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> That was the part I didn't understand. What are people doing to solve
> this generated files at release problem? I've solved this as upstream
> and a Debian developer by having tarballs.
Run the 'dist' stages as part of the 'build'
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 02:52:20AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> If I upload new packages A and B, that A depends and B, and
> that A gets approved, but B doesn't, then we end up with
> package A being in Debian, but never installable.
Has this ever happened? I believe the FTP masters do look at
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 09.04.2013, 17:54 +0200 schrieb Bernd Zeimetz:
> > Suggestion #3: have a system where any other DD can review
> > a package in the NEW queue, not only the FTP masters or the
> > FTP assistants.
>
> That would include publishing the contents of the NEW queue,
> at least to all
2013/4/9 Thomas Goirand :
> If I upload new packages A and B, that A depends and B, and
> that A gets approved, but B doesn't, then we end up with
> package A being in Debian, but never installable.
That is unlikely to happen: dak has a colour scheme to identify
missing packages. It's also nice to
Hi Charles,
On 10-04-13 00:56, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:54:14PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
>>
>>> Suggestion #3: have a system where any other DD can review
>>> a package in the NEW queue, not only the FTP masters or the
>>> FTP assistants.
>>
>> That would include pu
29 matches
Mail list logo
