Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Guimard
* Package name: libfennec-perl
Version : 1.012
Upstream Author : Chad Granum
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Fennec
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Perl tes
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Prévot
Control: block 705070 by -1
* Package name: pear-aws-channel
Version : 0~20130409
* URL : http://pear.amazonwebservices.com/
* License : public-domain
Programming Lang: XML
Description : PEAR channel
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Conversely, the existence of sites such as Ubuntu's PPA, SourceForge, GitHub
> and many others show that a large number of software providers are confident
> that a policy of a posteriori removals is sufficient. I do not understand why
> we do not reach the same conclusion
On 04/10/2013 06:56 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:54:14PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
>>> Suggestion #3: have a system where any other DD can review
>>> a package in the NEW queue, not only the FTP masters or the
>>> FTP assistants.
>> That would include publishing the c
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:25:30PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> makes a lot of sense. If your packaging workflow does not rely on
> importing the contents of release tarballs, then for projects like
> this you miss some content unless you re-run the same release
> scripts post-facto.
That was the
Le Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:54:14PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
>
> >Suggestion #3: have a system where any other DD can review
> >a package in the NEW queue, not only the FTP masters or the
> >FTP assistants.
>
> That would include publishing the contents of the NEW queue,
> at least to all De
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tobias Richter
This package that I really like was first orphaned and then removed,
without me noticing. In case an ITP is not the correct procedure at
this point, please advise.
The reason for removal was "RoQA; orphaned, better alternatives exist".
GNO
Técnicas Súper Efectivas de Cobranza.
Fecha: 15 de abril - 10:00 a.m a 1:00 p.m y De 3:00 p.m. a 6:00 p.m. (Hora del
Centro de México).
Lugar: Su computadora o dispositivo móvil.
Usted aprenderá lo que tiene que saber para evitar pasos legales en falso,
recibirá herramientas y técnicas que neces
On 09/04/13 17:54, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 02.04.2013 22:48, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 04/02/2013 12:16 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>>> In a perfect world there wouldn't be any need for a NEW queue at all.
>>> But we have to face with the reality.
>>> We try to do our best to improve things whe
On 04/09/2013 11:54 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> So when did you offer yourself to join the FTP team?
I didn't offer to completely join forever, but I offered my help,
few months ago. Though considering the mistakes I did in
the past (and still do from time to time, despite my (probably
wrong) feeli
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Prévot
* Package name: aws-sdk-for-php
Version : 1.6.2
Upstream Author : Ryan Parman
* URL : http://aws.amazon.com/sdkforphp/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: PHP
Description : software development
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 06:15:12PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2013-04-09 17:57, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> [...]
> >>> I'm not sure if it makes sense to recommend aptitude in its present state.
> >> I wouldn't recommend it when operating with multiarch enabled. Otherwise
> >> it's
> >> mostly f
> > Aptitude installs all recommended packages by default which was rather
> > annoying until I found that in the options menu as I ran out of space a
> > couple of times.
>
> as does apt-get.
I'm fairly sure synaptic doesn't select recommended by default, however
the synaptic package itself is
On 2013-04-09 17:57, Osamu Aoki wrote:
[...]
>>> I'm not sure if it makes sense to recommend aptitude in its present state.
>>
>> I wouldn't recommend it when operating with multiarch enabled. Otherwise it's
>> mostly fine.
Looks like we should start doing some automated upgrade tests with
aptitud
On 04/09/2013 11:57 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:32:52AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
On 09/04/2013 06:43, Adam Borowski wrote:
Have you been able to get that effect from aptitude? It seems that
whenever it sees some trouble (sometimes even when plain apt-get would
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:32:52AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 06:43, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:19:19AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> >> Actually, in the event of aptitude not being able to resolve the
> >> dependencies
> >> satisfactorily the first
On 02.04.2013 22:48, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 04/02/2013 12:16 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
In a perfect world there wouldn't be any need for a NEW queue at
all.
But we have to face with the reality.
We try to do our best to improve things where we can. From the FTP
Team side, we always try to be
Hi,
> Le Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:02:27PM +0300, Eugene Lychauka a écrit :
> > http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.html#pkgmgmt
> >
> > Here we can read:
> >
> > "The preferred program for interactive package management from a
> > terminal is aptitude. For a no
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
* Package name: libperlx-maybe-xs-perl
Version : 0.004
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/PerlX-Maybe-XS
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl, C
Desc
> Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> >Package: wnpp
> >Severity: wishlist
> >Owner: Laurent Bigonville
> >
> >* Package name: ruby-arr-pm
> > Version : 0.0.8
> > Upstream Author : Jordan Sissel
> >* URL : https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm
> >* License : Apache 2.0
> >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Apollon Oikonomopoulos
* Package name: ruby-hiredis
Version : 0.4.5
Upstream Author : Pieter Noordhuis
* URL : http://github.com/pietern/hiredis-rb
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : redis ruby
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 04:34 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 04/01/2013 11:06 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>>> On the other hand, FTP Team is willing to fast-track NEW packages
>>> anytime, if needed.
>> That's simply not truth. I can't let you say that
On 04/03/2013 04:34 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 11:06 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>> On the other hand, FTP Team is willing to fast-track NEW packages
>> anytime, if needed.
> That's simply not truth. I can't let you say that and not reply.
Hi,
I would like to publicly thanks Luca for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
* Package name: libmodule-install-contributors-perl
Version : 0.001
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Module-Install-Contributors
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Progra
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Wookey wrote:
> Is anyone actually working on making the aptitude multiarch-friendly, or
> planning to?
It appears so, see the bottom of this mail:
http://lists.debian.org/deity/2013/04/msg00027.html
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBS
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:29:09PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
[cut]
>
> I too am a huge aptitude fan. The curses UI is brilliant for working
> out what's up when things are a bit broken. However it doesn't deal
> with multiarch well so I've been stuck with apt-get trying to work out
> fro the tealeaves
Le mardi 9 avril 2013 13:29:09, Wookey a écrit :
>
> I too am a huge aptitude fan. The curses UI is brilliant for working
> out what's up when things are a bit broken. However it doesn't deal
> with multiarch well so I've been stuck with apt-get trying to work out
> fro the tealeaves what's wrong.
+++ Chow Loong Jin [2013-04-09 09:32 +0800]:
> On 09/04/2013 06:43, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:19:19AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> >> Actually, in the event of aptitude not being able to resolve the
> >> dependencies
> >> satisfactorily the first round (from aptitude in
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 15:46 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 08/04/13 13:53, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On 08-04-13 08:53, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >> I'm not suggesting that squeeze systems were installed that way by
> >> default, although people who have migrated an FS from a raw partition
> >> to
On 2013-04-09 11:05, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Aptitude installs all recommended packages by default which was rather
> annoying until I found that in the options menu as I ran out of space a
> couple of times.
as does apt-get.
--
brother
http://sis.bthstudent.se
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
> For instance, one of the (ugly) boxes I help admin recently
> had 1000 pacakges yet to update and > 60 security packages not done, and not
> enough space on the box to do them.
Aptitude installs all recommended packages by default which was rather
annoying until I found that in the options me
> > And how would I use it on Debian when there is no Internet Explorer 7
> > available for non-Windows platforms? Wine?
>
> The purpose is to provide a web thingy, hosted on a Debian platform,
> that even clients behind a legacy browser from non-free distribution can
> see as they should if the
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 17:15 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> So it seems that this is only going to be an issue if users take the
> unusual step of changing /etc/fstab to refer to LVs by UUID. But
> maybe there are management tools that do that as a matter of course?
I vaguely recall the occasio
33 matches
Mail list logo
