Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Étienne Loks"
* Package name: python-django-chimere
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Étienne Loks
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/chimere
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : collaborative
* Russ Allbery [130201 21:38]:
> > If you want bleeding edge, then you are not a normal user and you
> > certainly aren't a system administrator that wants to keep a controlled
> > system they can reproduce.
>
> Speak for yourself. I've been a system administrator for twenty years,
> and sometime
"Lennart Sorensen" writes:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 12:38:16PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I hope that's not generally true, because that would be horribly
>> depressing. I don't believe that's true of the Perl community in
>> general. It's certainly not true of the C or Java community!
> N
* Guillem Jover , 2013-01-29, 20:31:
if you are going to patch the package you might as well do the one line
change from "3.0 (native)" to "3.0 (quilt)", and rename the source
tarball to add «.orig».
That's a good solution for derivatives, not so much for NMUs or
backports.
--
Jakub Wilk
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 12:38:16PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I hope that's not generally true, because that would be horribly
> depressing. I don't believe that's true of the Perl community in general.
> It's certainly not true of the C or Java community!
Not all C libraries are distributed fr
"Lennart Sorensen" writes:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:00:32AM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
>> As a Haskell developer, I find cabal much more convenient than nothing,
>> in the situation where the library I want is not packaged by Debian
>> yet. If I want my haskell libraries and programs to reach
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:45:33AM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Chow Loong Jin's message of 2013-01-29 19:15:01 -0800:
> > Having multiple package managers which don't know about each other on a
> > system
> > is evil™ (but in some cases, can be managed properly).
> >
>
> Robert Col
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:00:32AM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> As a Haskell developer, I find cabal much more convenient than nothing,
> in the situation where the library I want is not packaged by Debian yet.
> If I want my haskell libraries and programs to reach a wide audience, I
> need to learn
Excerpts from Chow Loong Jin's message of 2013-01-29 19:15:01 -0800:
> Having multiple package managers which don't know about each other on a system
> is evil™ (but in some cases, can be managed properly).
>
Robert Collins did a nice write up on this very subject not long ago:
http://rbtcollins
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Wolodja Wentland
* Package name: libslingshot-clojure
Version : 0.10.3
Upstream Author : Stephen C. Gilardi
* URL : https://github.com/scgilardi/slingshot/
* License : EPL-1.0
Programming Lang: Clojure, Java
Descript
On 01/31/2013 23:41, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - The scope of what belongs into Built-Using is not clear. Policy is
>vague ("Examples include ...") and ftp-master seems to have a much
>more narrow interpretation.
There's an open bug[1] against debian-policy to improve the wording, but
nobod
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dain Nilsson
* Package name: yubikey-val
Version : 2.20
Upstream Author : Yubico Open Source Maintainers
* URL : https://github.com/Yubico/yubikey-val
* License : BSD-2-clause
Programming Lang: PHP
Description :
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 06:46:35PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Absolutely. As a user I have a nice package management system that I
> know how to use and which works well. I don't need another one.
As a Haskell developer, I find cabal much more convenient than nothing,
in the situation wher
13 matches
Mail list logo
