On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:33:57AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> However, to do that, there's one thing I'm missing in your mail: there
> will be cases where packages, when built in a particular profile do not
> support some functionality. That is, the package is available and does
> most of what
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:51:32PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:34:16AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:33:57AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > If wanna-build is updated to support these two fields, then I imagine
> > > it can run the
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:06:45PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> What's up with this base-files stuff? That's the second high-profile package
> I notice needing to put in a switch on it, and I’ve locally noticed even more
> and re-instated my lsb-release #624769 workaround in all sid chroots and
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libstore-opaque-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Steffen Mueller
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Store-Opaque/
*
What's up with this base-files stuff? That's the second high-profile package
I notice needing to put in a switch on it, and I’ve locally noticed even more
and re-instated my lsb-release #624769 workaround in all sid chroots and buildd
to get this fixed *again*:
root@aranym:~ # cat /var/cache/pbuil
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libbusiness-ismn-perl
Version : 1.11
Upstream Author : brian d foy
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Business-ISMN/
* Li
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libtie-cycle-perl
Version : 1.17
Upstream Author : brian d foy
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Tie-Cycle/
* License
I'm reporting this here because I expect other users might run into
this problem with the mulitlib migration and Debian developers might
need to know about it.
Last week I posted here about a Wheezy problem in the transition to
multilib. I had added the i386 arch and upgraded with apt-get. After
t
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:54:26AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Colin Watson wrote:
> > This is cleaner than any of the other options I've come up with: it
> > doesn't require hardcoding a list of "toolchain packages" that have
> > special cross versions; it would allow us t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Janos Guljas
* Package name: ansible
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Michael DeHaan
* URL : http://ansible.cc/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Configuration management, deployment, and t
On Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
> There's no requirement for md5sums files in the first place AFAIK.
for reference, this is #572571.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
11 matches
Mail list logo
