On 02/12/2012 05:16, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 1 December 2012 15:42, Jean-Christophe Dubacq
> wrote:
>> On 01/12/2012 12:10, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>>> These packages include documentation licensed under GFDL with Invariant
>>> Sections or Cover Texts:
>>>
>>> bash
>>> binutils
>>> tar
>>>
>>> As p
Am 01.12.2012 13:20, schrieb Jakub Wilk:
> * Jakub Wilk , 2012-12-01, 12:10:
>> These packages include documentation licensed under GFDL with Invariant
>> Sections or Cover Texts:
>
> To clarify: this is a list of _source_ packages.
your level of detail is appreciated.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 1 December 2012 15:42, Jean-Christophe Dubacq
wrote:
> On 01/12/2012 12:10, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> These packages include documentation licensed under GFDL with Invariant
>> Sections or Cover Texts:
>>
>> bash
>> binutils
>> tar
>>
>> As per GR 2006-001 such works are not suitable for main:
>> ht
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 10:39:35PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> More over, most of the sleep calls you will find in init scripts (and I
> believe that is what your grep shows, because that's the case on my own
> laptop...) are because of:
> case "${1}" in
> restart|reload|force-reload)
>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 03:40:41PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> the discussion that systemd is a bad design because it uses the same
> configuration file syntax as Windows ini files or XDG .desktop files,
> adding the statement that these are too difficult to parse.
If you are referin
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:06:23 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
>And this is not a systemd
>issue, even git uses that crap instead of something better like xml,
>or simpler, like the hierarchical format used by apt that resembles
>C++ classes.
Are there ready-made perl, python or ruby modu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Tagliamonte
* Package name: gcc-python-plugin
Version : 0.11
Upstream Author : "David Malcolm"
* URL : https://fedorahosted.org/gcc-python-plugin/
* License : GPLv3 (or later)
Programming Lang: C, Python
Descrip
On 01/12/2012 12:10, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> These packages include documentation licensed under GFDL with Invariant
> Sections or Cover Texts:
>
> bash
> binutils
> tar
>
> As per GR 2006-001 such works are not suitable for main:
> http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
>
> Any volunteers to file
On Dec 1, 2012, at 0:45, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> Are you equating the FSF and the PSF with a private, for-profit company
>> here? That seems to be stretching it a bit.
>
> Not really, IMO.
>
> Personally, I'm not comfortable
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 12:10:05PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> These packages include documentation licensed under GFDL with
> Invariant Sections or Cover Texts:
[..]
> As per GR 2006-001 such works are not suitable for main:
> http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
Would you mind sharing the scr
On 11/30/2012 08:34 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Why are those sleeps there? Because the use of init scripts ensures that
> we're always racing the kernel, instead of being able to respond directly to
> events when they happen. Nearly every one of those sleeps represents *two*
> bugs: the bug the
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 03:17:03PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Please stop fueling these threads already (especially when the subject
> is not meaningful at all).
Hey, didn't I say several times already that I would like to leave it?
Please don't address me, I have been tired of this for se
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 10:12:15PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 12/01/2012 05:34 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > systemd is not Lennart, he is one of the many contributors.
> This statement is simply false.
Thomas, John Paul Adrian, seriously, we have had enough of these debates
on -
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 10:12:15PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 12/01/2012 05:34 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > systemd is not Lennart, he is one of the many contributors.
>
> This statement is simply false.
>
> I just checked with "git blame". Out of 381 473 lines of code in
> the
On 12/01/2012 05:34 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> systemd is not Lennart, he is one of the many contributors.
This statement is simply false.
I just checked with "git blame". Out of 381 473 lines of code in
the Git, git blame reports 152 787 lines with "Poettering" in it.
That's more tha
On 01.12.2012 06:18, Michael Biebl wrote:
> For b/ there is already a bug report for initramfs-tools [1]. It's
> probably too late to get that into wheezy. But we should follow up there
> to get that into wheezy.
^
jessie, of course.
--
Why is it that all o
* Jakub Wilk , 2012-12-01, 12:10:
These packages include documentation licensed under GFDL with Invariant
Sections or Cover Texts:
To clarify: this is a list of _source_ packages.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Vi, 30 nov 12, 18:03:41, Harald Jenny wrote:
>
> Yes a dedicated list (maybe just a temporary one) especially meant for
> the early adopter/tester of systemd/upstart/OpenRC, preferrable people
> who are DDs/DMs themselves and can describe/triage problems properly...
I don't think this would be
These packages include documentation licensed under GFDL with Invariant
Sections or Cover Texts:
adplug
autoconf2.59
bash
binutils
cflow
cgdb
chromium-browser
cpio
ecl
gcc-4.7
gcc-h8300-hms
gcc-snapshot
gcj-4.7
gcl
gdb
gengetopt
gforth
gmerlin
groff
gsl
gtypist
kbuild
kdesdk
libbinio
mathgl
muse
Le samedi 01 décembre 2012 à 09:52 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 03:58:05PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le jeudi 29 novembre 2012 à 15:24 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > > Now if someone wants to fork the particular bits of upstream software so
> > > makin
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 09:31:37AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:00:01AM +0200, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> > Systemd does much better than its competitors as a social activity.
>
> ROTFL.
>
> I don't have much to say about the quality of Lennert's code, but his
> social ski
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:18:04AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-11-29 08:37:19 -0800, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > And interfaces in various programming languages?
> >
> > http://search.cpan.org/~shlomif/Config-IniFiles-2.78/lib
]] Wouter Verhelst
[...]
> Personally, I'm not comfortable signing off my copyright to the FSF, for
> the very same reason I'm not comfortable signing off copyright to
> Canonical: while both are led by a person whom so far hasn't show much
> reason for me to distrust them, it is also true that
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:37:19AM -0800, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >
> > And interfaces in various programming languages?
>
> http://docs.python.org/2/library/configparser.html
> http://search.cpan.org/~shlomif/Config-IniFiles-2.78/lib/Confi
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:51:47PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 03:28:40PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/homepage.jsp?code=PC68KCF
> >
> > the most recent processor you can find there was released in January
> > 2012
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 03:58:05PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 29 novembre 2012 à 15:24 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > Now if someone wants to fork the particular bits of upstream software so
> > making use of a separate /usr is still possible, even if you think it's
> > totall
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Are you equating the FSF and the PSF with a private, for-profit company
> here? That seems to be stretching it a bit.
Not really, IMO.
Personally, I'm not comfortable signing off my copyright to the FSF, for
the very same reason
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:00:01AM +0200, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> Systemd does much better than its competitors as a social activity.
ROTFL.
I don't have much to say about the quality of Lennert's code, but his
social skills are sorely lacking.
--
Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time so
28 matches
Mail list logo
